Gentle Versus Strong Touch Classification: Preliminary Results, Challenges, and Potentials

Touch plays a crucial role in humans’ nonverbal social and affective communication. It then comes as no surprise to observe a considerable effort that has been placed on devising methodologies for automated touch classification. For instance, such an ability allows for the use of smart touch sensors...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Soheil Keshmiri, Masahiro Shiomi, Hidenobu Sumioka, Takashi Minato, Hiroshi Ishiguro
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-05-01
Series:Sensors
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/20/11/3033
id doaj-d922b84bd19f4e7fb0e6189598488b5e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d922b84bd19f4e7fb0e6189598488b5e2020-11-25T03:17:20ZengMDPI AGSensors1424-82202020-05-01203033303310.3390/s20113033Gentle Versus Strong Touch Classification: Preliminary Results, Challenges, and PotentialsSoheil Keshmiri0Masahiro Shiomi1Hidenobu Sumioka2Takashi Minato3Hiroshi Ishiguro4Advanced Telecommunications Research Institute International (ATR), Kyoto 619-0237, JapanAdvanced Telecommunications Research Institute International (ATR), Kyoto 619-0237, JapanAdvanced Telecommunications Research Institute International (ATR), Kyoto 619-0237, JapanAdvanced Telecommunications Research Institute International (ATR), Kyoto 619-0237, JapanAdvanced Telecommunications Research Institute International (ATR), Kyoto 619-0237, JapanTouch plays a crucial role in humans’ nonverbal social and affective communication. It then comes as no surprise to observe a considerable effort that has been placed on devising methodologies for automated touch classification. For instance, such an ability allows for the use of smart touch sensors in such real-life application domains as socially-assistive robots and embodied telecommunication. In fact, touch classification literature represents an undeniably progressive result. However, these results are limited in two important ways. First, they are mostly based on overall (i.e., average) accuracy of different classifiers. As a result, they fall short in providing an insight on performance of these approaches as per different types of touch. Second, they do not consider the same type of touch with different level of strength (e.g., gentle versus strong touch). This is certainly an important factor that deserves investigating since the intensity of a touch can utterly transform its meaning (e.g., from an affectionate gesture to a sign of punishment). The current study provides a preliminary investigation of these shortcomings by considering the accuracy of a number of classifiers for both, within- (i.e., same type of touch with differing strengths) and between-touch (i.e., different types of touch) classifications. Our results help verify the strength and shortcoming of different machine learning algorithms for touch classification. They also highlight some of the challenges whose solution concepts can pave the path for integration of touch sensors in such application domains as human–robot interaction (HRI).https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/20/11/3033physical interactiontouch classificationhuman–agent physical interaction
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Soheil Keshmiri
Masahiro Shiomi
Hidenobu Sumioka
Takashi Minato
Hiroshi Ishiguro
spellingShingle Soheil Keshmiri
Masahiro Shiomi
Hidenobu Sumioka
Takashi Minato
Hiroshi Ishiguro
Gentle Versus Strong Touch Classification: Preliminary Results, Challenges, and Potentials
Sensors
physical interaction
touch classification
human–agent physical interaction
author_facet Soheil Keshmiri
Masahiro Shiomi
Hidenobu Sumioka
Takashi Minato
Hiroshi Ishiguro
author_sort Soheil Keshmiri
title Gentle Versus Strong Touch Classification: Preliminary Results, Challenges, and Potentials
title_short Gentle Versus Strong Touch Classification: Preliminary Results, Challenges, and Potentials
title_full Gentle Versus Strong Touch Classification: Preliminary Results, Challenges, and Potentials
title_fullStr Gentle Versus Strong Touch Classification: Preliminary Results, Challenges, and Potentials
title_full_unstemmed Gentle Versus Strong Touch Classification: Preliminary Results, Challenges, and Potentials
title_sort gentle versus strong touch classification: preliminary results, challenges, and potentials
publisher MDPI AG
series Sensors
issn 1424-8220
publishDate 2020-05-01
description Touch plays a crucial role in humans’ nonverbal social and affective communication. It then comes as no surprise to observe a considerable effort that has been placed on devising methodologies for automated touch classification. For instance, such an ability allows for the use of smart touch sensors in such real-life application domains as socially-assistive robots and embodied telecommunication. In fact, touch classification literature represents an undeniably progressive result. However, these results are limited in two important ways. First, they are mostly based on overall (i.e., average) accuracy of different classifiers. As a result, they fall short in providing an insight on performance of these approaches as per different types of touch. Second, they do not consider the same type of touch with different level of strength (e.g., gentle versus strong touch). This is certainly an important factor that deserves investigating since the intensity of a touch can utterly transform its meaning (e.g., from an affectionate gesture to a sign of punishment). The current study provides a preliminary investigation of these shortcomings by considering the accuracy of a number of classifiers for both, within- (i.e., same type of touch with differing strengths) and between-touch (i.e., different types of touch) classifications. Our results help verify the strength and shortcoming of different machine learning algorithms for touch classification. They also highlight some of the challenges whose solution concepts can pave the path for integration of touch sensors in such application domains as human–robot interaction (HRI).
topic physical interaction
touch classification
human–agent physical interaction
url https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/20/11/3033
work_keys_str_mv AT soheilkeshmiri gentleversusstrongtouchclassificationpreliminaryresultschallengesandpotentials
AT masahiroshiomi gentleversusstrongtouchclassificationpreliminaryresultschallengesandpotentials
AT hidenobusumioka gentleversusstrongtouchclassificationpreliminaryresultschallengesandpotentials
AT takashiminato gentleversusstrongtouchclassificationpreliminaryresultschallengesandpotentials
AT hiroshiishiguro gentleversusstrongtouchclassificationpreliminaryresultschallengesandpotentials
_version_ 1724631964106883072