Gentle Versus Strong Touch Classification: Preliminary Results, Challenges, and Potentials
Touch plays a crucial role in humans’ nonverbal social and affective communication. It then comes as no surprise to observe a considerable effort that has been placed on devising methodologies for automated touch classification. For instance, such an ability allows for the use of smart touch sensors...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2020-05-01
|
Series: | Sensors |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/20/11/3033 |
id |
doaj-d922b84bd19f4e7fb0e6189598488b5e |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-d922b84bd19f4e7fb0e6189598488b5e2020-11-25T03:17:20ZengMDPI AGSensors1424-82202020-05-01203033303310.3390/s20113033Gentle Versus Strong Touch Classification: Preliminary Results, Challenges, and PotentialsSoheil Keshmiri0Masahiro Shiomi1Hidenobu Sumioka2Takashi Minato3Hiroshi Ishiguro4Advanced Telecommunications Research Institute International (ATR), Kyoto 619-0237, JapanAdvanced Telecommunications Research Institute International (ATR), Kyoto 619-0237, JapanAdvanced Telecommunications Research Institute International (ATR), Kyoto 619-0237, JapanAdvanced Telecommunications Research Institute International (ATR), Kyoto 619-0237, JapanAdvanced Telecommunications Research Institute International (ATR), Kyoto 619-0237, JapanTouch plays a crucial role in humans’ nonverbal social and affective communication. It then comes as no surprise to observe a considerable effort that has been placed on devising methodologies for automated touch classification. For instance, such an ability allows for the use of smart touch sensors in such real-life application domains as socially-assistive robots and embodied telecommunication. In fact, touch classification literature represents an undeniably progressive result. However, these results are limited in two important ways. First, they are mostly based on overall (i.e., average) accuracy of different classifiers. As a result, they fall short in providing an insight on performance of these approaches as per different types of touch. Second, they do not consider the same type of touch with different level of strength (e.g., gentle versus strong touch). This is certainly an important factor that deserves investigating since the intensity of a touch can utterly transform its meaning (e.g., from an affectionate gesture to a sign of punishment). The current study provides a preliminary investigation of these shortcomings by considering the accuracy of a number of classifiers for both, within- (i.e., same type of touch with differing strengths) and between-touch (i.e., different types of touch) classifications. Our results help verify the strength and shortcoming of different machine learning algorithms for touch classification. They also highlight some of the challenges whose solution concepts can pave the path for integration of touch sensors in such application domains as human–robot interaction (HRI).https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/20/11/3033physical interactiontouch classificationhuman–agent physical interaction |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Soheil Keshmiri Masahiro Shiomi Hidenobu Sumioka Takashi Minato Hiroshi Ishiguro |
spellingShingle |
Soheil Keshmiri Masahiro Shiomi Hidenobu Sumioka Takashi Minato Hiroshi Ishiguro Gentle Versus Strong Touch Classification: Preliminary Results, Challenges, and Potentials Sensors physical interaction touch classification human–agent physical interaction |
author_facet |
Soheil Keshmiri Masahiro Shiomi Hidenobu Sumioka Takashi Minato Hiroshi Ishiguro |
author_sort |
Soheil Keshmiri |
title |
Gentle Versus Strong Touch Classification: Preliminary Results, Challenges, and Potentials |
title_short |
Gentle Versus Strong Touch Classification: Preliminary Results, Challenges, and Potentials |
title_full |
Gentle Versus Strong Touch Classification: Preliminary Results, Challenges, and Potentials |
title_fullStr |
Gentle Versus Strong Touch Classification: Preliminary Results, Challenges, and Potentials |
title_full_unstemmed |
Gentle Versus Strong Touch Classification: Preliminary Results, Challenges, and Potentials |
title_sort |
gentle versus strong touch classification: preliminary results, challenges, and potentials |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Sensors |
issn |
1424-8220 |
publishDate |
2020-05-01 |
description |
Touch plays a crucial role in humans’ nonverbal social and affective communication. It then comes as no surprise to observe a considerable effort that has been placed on devising methodologies for automated touch classification. For instance, such an ability allows for the use of smart touch sensors in such real-life application domains as socially-assistive robots and embodied telecommunication. In fact, touch classification literature represents an undeniably progressive result. However, these results are limited in two important ways. First, they are mostly based on overall (i.e., average) accuracy of different classifiers. As a result, they fall short in providing an insight on performance of these approaches as per different types of touch. Second, they do not consider the same type of touch with different level of strength (e.g., gentle versus strong touch). This is certainly an important factor that deserves investigating since the intensity of a touch can utterly transform its meaning (e.g., from an affectionate gesture to a sign of punishment). The current study provides a preliminary investigation of these shortcomings by considering the accuracy of a number of classifiers for both, within- (i.e., same type of touch with differing strengths) and between-touch (i.e., different types of touch) classifications. Our results help verify the strength and shortcoming of different machine learning algorithms for touch classification. They also highlight some of the challenges whose solution concepts can pave the path for integration of touch sensors in such application domains as human–robot interaction (HRI). |
topic |
physical interaction touch classification human–agent physical interaction |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/20/11/3033 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT soheilkeshmiri gentleversusstrongtouchclassificationpreliminaryresultschallengesandpotentials AT masahiroshiomi gentleversusstrongtouchclassificationpreliminaryresultschallengesandpotentials AT hidenobusumioka gentleversusstrongtouchclassificationpreliminaryresultschallengesandpotentials AT takashiminato gentleversusstrongtouchclassificationpreliminaryresultschallengesandpotentials AT hiroshiishiguro gentleversusstrongtouchclassificationpreliminaryresultschallengesandpotentials |
_version_ |
1724631964106883072 |