Functional Gene Analysis Reveals Cell Cycle Changes and Inflammation in Endothelial Cells Irradiated with a Single X-ray Dose

Background and Purpose: Epidemiological data suggests an excess risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) at low doses (0.05 and 0.1 Gy) of ionizing radiation (IR). Furthermore, the underlying biological and molecular mechanisms of radiation-induced CVD are still unclear. Because damage to the endotheliu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: An Aerts, Bjorn Baselet, Niels Belmans, Emma Coninx, Donna Lowe, Ann Janssen, Arlette Michaux, Kevin Tabury, Kenneth Raj, Roel Quintens, Mohammed A. Benotmane, Sarah Baatout, Pierre Sonveaux
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-04-01
Series:Frontiers in Pharmacology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fphar.2017.00213/full
id doaj-d81aba6b84214e9d861f4fe3b2d6535d
record_format Article
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author An Aerts
Bjorn Baselet
Bjorn Baselet
Niels Belmans
Niels Belmans
Emma Coninx
Donna Lowe
Ann Janssen
Arlette Michaux
Kevin Tabury
Kevin Tabury
Kenneth Raj
Roel Quintens
Mohammed A. Benotmane
Sarah Baatout
Sarah Baatout
Pierre Sonveaux
spellingShingle An Aerts
Bjorn Baselet
Bjorn Baselet
Niels Belmans
Niels Belmans
Emma Coninx
Donna Lowe
Ann Janssen
Arlette Michaux
Kevin Tabury
Kevin Tabury
Kenneth Raj
Roel Quintens
Mohammed A. Benotmane
Sarah Baatout
Sarah Baatout
Pierre Sonveaux
Functional Gene Analysis Reveals Cell Cycle Changes and Inflammation in Endothelial Cells Irradiated with a Single X-ray Dose
Frontiers in Pharmacology
X-ray
endothelium
atherosclerosis
cardiovascular disease
cell cycle
author_facet An Aerts
Bjorn Baselet
Bjorn Baselet
Niels Belmans
Niels Belmans
Emma Coninx
Donna Lowe
Ann Janssen
Arlette Michaux
Kevin Tabury
Kevin Tabury
Kenneth Raj
Roel Quintens
Mohammed A. Benotmane
Sarah Baatout
Sarah Baatout
Pierre Sonveaux
author_sort An Aerts
title Functional Gene Analysis Reveals Cell Cycle Changes and Inflammation in Endothelial Cells Irradiated with a Single X-ray Dose
title_short Functional Gene Analysis Reveals Cell Cycle Changes and Inflammation in Endothelial Cells Irradiated with a Single X-ray Dose
title_full Functional Gene Analysis Reveals Cell Cycle Changes and Inflammation in Endothelial Cells Irradiated with a Single X-ray Dose
title_fullStr Functional Gene Analysis Reveals Cell Cycle Changes and Inflammation in Endothelial Cells Irradiated with a Single X-ray Dose
title_full_unstemmed Functional Gene Analysis Reveals Cell Cycle Changes and Inflammation in Endothelial Cells Irradiated with a Single X-ray Dose
title_sort functional gene analysis reveals cell cycle changes and inflammation in endothelial cells irradiated with a single x-ray dose
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Pharmacology
issn 1663-9812
publishDate 2017-04-01
description Background and Purpose: Epidemiological data suggests an excess risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) at low doses (0.05 and 0.1 Gy) of ionizing radiation (IR). Furthermore, the underlying biological and molecular mechanisms of radiation-induced CVD are still unclear. Because damage to the endothelium could be critical in IR-related CVD, this study aimed to identify the effects of radiation on immortalized endothelial cells in the context of atherosclerosis.Material and Methods: Microarrays and RT-qPCR were used to compare the response of endothelial cells irradiated with a single X-ray dose (0.05, 0.1, 0.5, 2 Gy) measured after various post-irradiation (repair) times (1 day, 7 days, 14 days). To consolidate and mechanistically support the endothelial cell response to X-ray exposure identified via microarray analysis, DNA repair signaling (γH2AX/TP53BP1-foci quantification), cell cycle progression (BrdU/7AAD flow cytometric analysis), cellular senescence (β-galactosidase assay with CPRG and IGFBP7 quantification) and pro-inflammatory status (IL6 and CCL2) was assessed.Results: Microarray results indicated persistent changes in cell cycle progression and inflammation. Cells underwent G1 arrest in a dose-dependent manner after high doses (0.5 and 2 Gy), which was compensated by increased proliferation after 1 week and almost normalized after 2 weeks. However, at this point irradiated cells showed an increased β-Gal activity and IGFBP7 secretion, indicative of premature senescence. The production of pro-inflammatory cytokines IL6 and CCL2 was increased at early time points.Conclusions: IR induces pro-atherosclerotic processes in endothelial cells in a dose-dependent manner. These findings give an incentive for further research on the shape of the dose-response curve, as we show that even low doses of IR can induce premature endothelial senescence at later time points. Furthermore, our findings on the time- and dose-dependent response regarding differentially expressed genes, cell cycle progression, inflammation and senescence bring novel insights into the underlying molecular mechanisms of the endothelial response to X-ray radiation. This may in turn lead to the development of risk-reducing strategies to prevent IR-induced CVD, such as the use of cell cycle modulators and anti-inflammatory drugs as radioprotectors and/or radiation mitigators.
topic X-ray
endothelium
atherosclerosis
cardiovascular disease
cell cycle
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fphar.2017.00213/full
work_keys_str_mv AT anaerts functionalgeneanalysisrevealscellcyclechangesandinflammationinendothelialcellsirradiatedwithasinglexraydose
AT bjornbaselet functionalgeneanalysisrevealscellcyclechangesandinflammationinendothelialcellsirradiatedwithasinglexraydose
AT bjornbaselet functionalgeneanalysisrevealscellcyclechangesandinflammationinendothelialcellsirradiatedwithasinglexraydose
AT nielsbelmans functionalgeneanalysisrevealscellcyclechangesandinflammationinendothelialcellsirradiatedwithasinglexraydose
AT nielsbelmans functionalgeneanalysisrevealscellcyclechangesandinflammationinendothelialcellsirradiatedwithasinglexraydose
AT emmaconinx functionalgeneanalysisrevealscellcyclechangesandinflammationinendothelialcellsirradiatedwithasinglexraydose
AT donnalowe functionalgeneanalysisrevealscellcyclechangesandinflammationinendothelialcellsirradiatedwithasinglexraydose
AT annjanssen functionalgeneanalysisrevealscellcyclechangesandinflammationinendothelialcellsirradiatedwithasinglexraydose
AT arlettemichaux functionalgeneanalysisrevealscellcyclechangesandinflammationinendothelialcellsirradiatedwithasinglexraydose
AT kevintabury functionalgeneanalysisrevealscellcyclechangesandinflammationinendothelialcellsirradiatedwithasinglexraydose
AT kevintabury functionalgeneanalysisrevealscellcyclechangesandinflammationinendothelialcellsirradiatedwithasinglexraydose
AT kennethraj functionalgeneanalysisrevealscellcyclechangesandinflammationinendothelialcellsirradiatedwithasinglexraydose
AT roelquintens functionalgeneanalysisrevealscellcyclechangesandinflammationinendothelialcellsirradiatedwithasinglexraydose
AT mohammedabenotmane functionalgeneanalysisrevealscellcyclechangesandinflammationinendothelialcellsirradiatedwithasinglexraydose
AT sarahbaatout functionalgeneanalysisrevealscellcyclechangesandinflammationinendothelialcellsirradiatedwithasinglexraydose
AT sarahbaatout functionalgeneanalysisrevealscellcyclechangesandinflammationinendothelialcellsirradiatedwithasinglexraydose
AT pierresonveaux functionalgeneanalysisrevealscellcyclechangesandinflammationinendothelialcellsirradiatedwithasinglexraydose
_version_ 1716813243337408512
spelling doaj-d81aba6b84214e9d861f4fe3b2d6535d2020-11-24T20:46:04ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Pharmacology1663-98122017-04-01810.3389/fphar.2017.00213253802Functional Gene Analysis Reveals Cell Cycle Changes and Inflammation in Endothelial Cells Irradiated with a Single X-ray DoseAn Aerts0Bjorn Baselet1Bjorn Baselet2Niels Belmans3Niels Belmans4Emma Coninx5Donna Lowe6Ann Janssen7Arlette Michaux8Kevin Tabury9Kevin Tabury10Kenneth Raj11Roel Quintens12Mohammed A. Benotmane13Sarah Baatout14Sarah Baatout15Pierre Sonveaux16Radiobiology Unit, Belgian Nuclear Research Centre (SCK•CEN), Institute for Environment, Health and SafetyMol, BelgiumRadiobiology Unit, Belgian Nuclear Research Centre (SCK•CEN), Institute for Environment, Health and SafetyMol, BelgiumInstitut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Pole of Pharmacology & Therapeutics, Université catholique de LouvainBrussels, BelgiumRadiobiology Unit, Belgian Nuclear Research Centre (SCK•CEN), Institute for Environment, Health and SafetyMol, BelgiumFaculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, Biomedical Research Institute, Hasselt UniversityHasselt, BelgiumRadiobiology Unit, Belgian Nuclear Research Centre (SCK•CEN), Institute for Environment, Health and SafetyMol, BelgiumCentre for Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards, Public Health EnglandDidcot, UKRadiobiology Unit, Belgian Nuclear Research Centre (SCK•CEN), Institute for Environment, Health and SafetyMol, BelgiumRadiobiology Unit, Belgian Nuclear Research Centre (SCK•CEN), Institute for Environment, Health and SafetyMol, BelgiumRadiobiology Unit, Belgian Nuclear Research Centre (SCK•CEN), Institute for Environment, Health and SafetyMol, BelgiumBiomedical Engineering Program and Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USACentre for Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards, Public Health EnglandDidcot, UKRadiobiology Unit, Belgian Nuclear Research Centre (SCK•CEN), Institute for Environment, Health and SafetyMol, BelgiumRadiobiology Unit, Belgian Nuclear Research Centre (SCK•CEN), Institute for Environment, Health and SafetyMol, BelgiumRadiobiology Unit, Belgian Nuclear Research Centre (SCK•CEN), Institute for Environment, Health and SafetyMol, BelgiumDepartment of Molecular Biotechnology, Ghent UniversityGhent, BelgiumInstitut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Pole of Pharmacology & Therapeutics, Université catholique de LouvainBrussels, BelgiumBackground and Purpose: Epidemiological data suggests an excess risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) at low doses (0.05 and 0.1 Gy) of ionizing radiation (IR). Furthermore, the underlying biological and molecular mechanisms of radiation-induced CVD are still unclear. Because damage to the endothelium could be critical in IR-related CVD, this study aimed to identify the effects of radiation on immortalized endothelial cells in the context of atherosclerosis.Material and Methods: Microarrays and RT-qPCR were used to compare the response of endothelial cells irradiated with a single X-ray dose (0.05, 0.1, 0.5, 2 Gy) measured after various post-irradiation (repair) times (1 day, 7 days, 14 days). To consolidate and mechanistically support the endothelial cell response to X-ray exposure identified via microarray analysis, DNA repair signaling (γH2AX/TP53BP1-foci quantification), cell cycle progression (BrdU/7AAD flow cytometric analysis), cellular senescence (β-galactosidase assay with CPRG and IGFBP7 quantification) and pro-inflammatory status (IL6 and CCL2) was assessed.Results: Microarray results indicated persistent changes in cell cycle progression and inflammation. Cells underwent G1 arrest in a dose-dependent manner after high doses (0.5 and 2 Gy), which was compensated by increased proliferation after 1 week and almost normalized after 2 weeks. However, at this point irradiated cells showed an increased β-Gal activity and IGFBP7 secretion, indicative of premature senescence. The production of pro-inflammatory cytokines IL6 and CCL2 was increased at early time points.Conclusions: IR induces pro-atherosclerotic processes in endothelial cells in a dose-dependent manner. These findings give an incentive for further research on the shape of the dose-response curve, as we show that even low doses of IR can induce premature endothelial senescence at later time points. Furthermore, our findings on the time- and dose-dependent response regarding differentially expressed genes, cell cycle progression, inflammation and senescence bring novel insights into the underlying molecular mechanisms of the endothelial response to X-ray radiation. This may in turn lead to the development of risk-reducing strategies to prevent IR-induced CVD, such as the use of cell cycle modulators and anti-inflammatory drugs as radioprotectors and/or radiation mitigators.http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fphar.2017.00213/fullX-rayendotheliumatherosclerosiscardiovascular diseasecell cycle