The Effect of Common Inversion Polymorphisms In(2L)t and In(3R)Mo on Patterns of Transcriptional Variation in Drosophila melanogaster

Chromosomal inversions are a ubiquitous feature of genetic variation. Theoretical models describe several mechanisms by which inversions can drive adaptation and be maintained as polymorphisms. While inversions have been shown previously to be under selection, or contain genetic variation under sele...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Erik Lavington, Andrew D. Kern
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Oxford University Press 2017-11-01
Series:G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://g3journal.org/lookup/doi/10.1534/g3.117.1133
id doaj-d1082b61c9b8413bb500af2c0c880925
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d1082b61c9b8413bb500af2c0c8809252021-07-02T01:39:30ZengOxford University PressG3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics2160-18362017-11-017113659366810.1534/g3.117.11339The Effect of Common Inversion Polymorphisms In(2L)t and In(3R)Mo on Patterns of Transcriptional Variation in Drosophila melanogasterErik LavingtonAndrew D. KernChromosomal inversions are a ubiquitous feature of genetic variation. Theoretical models describe several mechanisms by which inversions can drive adaptation and be maintained as polymorphisms. While inversions have been shown previously to be under selection, or contain genetic variation under selection, the specific phenotypic consequences of inversions leading to their maintenance remain unclear. Here we use genomic sequence and expression data from the Drosophila Genetic Reference Panel (DGRP) to explore the effects of two cosmopolitan inversions, In(2L)t and In(3R)Mo, on patterns of transcriptional variation. We demonstrate that each inversion has a significant effect on transcript abundance for hundreds of genes across the genome. Inversion-affected loci (IAL) appear both within inversions as well as on unlinked chromosomes. Importantly, IAL do not appear to be influenced by the previously reported genome-wide expression correlation structure. We found that five genes involved with sterol uptake, four of which are Niemann-Pick Type 2 orthologs, are upregulated in flies with In(3R)Mo but do not have SNPs in linkage disequilibrium (LD) with the inversion. We speculate that this upregulation is driven by genetic variation in mod(mdg4) that is in LD with In(3R)Mo. We find that there is little evidence for a regional or position effect of inversions on gene expression at the chromosomal level, but do find evidence for the distal breakpoint of In(3R)Mo interrupting one gene and possibly disassociating the two flanking genes from regulatory elements.http://g3journal.org/lookup/doi/10.1534/g3.117.1133Drosophilainversion polymorphismeQTLsDGRPDPGP
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Erik Lavington
Andrew D. Kern
spellingShingle Erik Lavington
Andrew D. Kern
The Effect of Common Inversion Polymorphisms In(2L)t and In(3R)Mo on Patterns of Transcriptional Variation in Drosophila melanogaster
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
Drosophila
inversion polymorphism
eQTLs
DGRP
DPGP
author_facet Erik Lavington
Andrew D. Kern
author_sort Erik Lavington
title The Effect of Common Inversion Polymorphisms In(2L)t and In(3R)Mo on Patterns of Transcriptional Variation in Drosophila melanogaster
title_short The Effect of Common Inversion Polymorphisms In(2L)t and In(3R)Mo on Patterns of Transcriptional Variation in Drosophila melanogaster
title_full The Effect of Common Inversion Polymorphisms In(2L)t and In(3R)Mo on Patterns of Transcriptional Variation in Drosophila melanogaster
title_fullStr The Effect of Common Inversion Polymorphisms In(2L)t and In(3R)Mo on Patterns of Transcriptional Variation in Drosophila melanogaster
title_full_unstemmed The Effect of Common Inversion Polymorphisms In(2L)t and In(3R)Mo on Patterns of Transcriptional Variation in Drosophila melanogaster
title_sort effect of common inversion polymorphisms in(2l)t and in(3r)mo on patterns of transcriptional variation in drosophila melanogaster
publisher Oxford University Press
series G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
issn 2160-1836
publishDate 2017-11-01
description Chromosomal inversions are a ubiquitous feature of genetic variation. Theoretical models describe several mechanisms by which inversions can drive adaptation and be maintained as polymorphisms. While inversions have been shown previously to be under selection, or contain genetic variation under selection, the specific phenotypic consequences of inversions leading to their maintenance remain unclear. Here we use genomic sequence and expression data from the Drosophila Genetic Reference Panel (DGRP) to explore the effects of two cosmopolitan inversions, In(2L)t and In(3R)Mo, on patterns of transcriptional variation. We demonstrate that each inversion has a significant effect on transcript abundance for hundreds of genes across the genome. Inversion-affected loci (IAL) appear both within inversions as well as on unlinked chromosomes. Importantly, IAL do not appear to be influenced by the previously reported genome-wide expression correlation structure. We found that five genes involved with sterol uptake, four of which are Niemann-Pick Type 2 orthologs, are upregulated in flies with In(3R)Mo but do not have SNPs in linkage disequilibrium (LD) with the inversion. We speculate that this upregulation is driven by genetic variation in mod(mdg4) that is in LD with In(3R)Mo. We find that there is little evidence for a regional or position effect of inversions on gene expression at the chromosomal level, but do find evidence for the distal breakpoint of In(3R)Mo interrupting one gene and possibly disassociating the two flanking genes from regulatory elements.
topic Drosophila
inversion polymorphism
eQTLs
DGRP
DPGP
url http://g3journal.org/lookup/doi/10.1534/g3.117.1133
work_keys_str_mv AT eriklavington theeffectofcommoninversionpolymorphismsin2ltandin3rmoonpatternsoftranscriptionalvariationindrosophilamelanogaster
AT andrewdkern theeffectofcommoninversionpolymorphismsin2ltandin3rmoonpatternsoftranscriptionalvariationindrosophilamelanogaster
AT eriklavington effectofcommoninversionpolymorphismsin2ltandin3rmoonpatternsoftranscriptionalvariationindrosophilamelanogaster
AT andrewdkern effectofcommoninversionpolymorphismsin2ltandin3rmoonpatternsoftranscriptionalvariationindrosophilamelanogaster
_version_ 1721344676902993920