Outcomes Standardisation Project (OSP) for Continuing Medical Education (CE/CME) Professionals: Background, Methods, and Initial Terms and Definitions

• Main Authors: Brian S. McGowan, Anthia Mandarakas, Sue McGuinness, Jason Olivieri, Karyn Ruiz-Cordell, Greg Salinas, Wendy Turell
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2020-01-01
• Series: Journal of European CME
• Subjects: assessment; educational research; evaluation; glossary; outcomes; standardisation; taxonomy
• Online Access: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21614083.2020.1717187
• ISSN: 2161-4083

Despite an increased focus and urgency for CE/CME professionals to effectively and systematically assess the impact of their educational interventions, the community has struggled to do so. This struggle is in large part due to the lack of a standardised outcomes language and a set of unified approaches to measure and communicate impact. In the spring of 2018, a group of volunteer educational research scientists and CE/CME professionals established a rigorous consensus-building process in an effort to address this need. This report describes the background, methods and first-year output (Glossary V1) of the Outcomes Standardisation Project (OSP); begins to introduce examples of how the OSP Glossary V1 may support the CE/CME professional community and concludes with plans for the future of establishing a common framework for the profession.