Development of an objective gene expression panel as an alternative to self-reported symptom scores in human influenza challenge trials

Abstract Background Influenza challenge trials are important for vaccine efficacy testing. Currently, disease severity is determined by self-reported scores to a list of symptoms which can be highly subjective. A more objective measure would allow for improved data analysis. Methods Twenty-one volun...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Julius Muller, Eneida Parizotto, Richard Antrobus, James Francis, Campbell Bunce, Amanda Stranks, Marshall Nichols, Micah McClain, Adrian V. S. Hill, Adaikalavan Ramasamy, Sarah C. Gilbert
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2017-06-01
Series:Journal of Translational Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12967-017-1235-3
id doaj-cd2fcc31758143c78c36ae492fe23e7f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-cd2fcc31758143c78c36ae492fe23e7f2020-11-24T20:55:59ZengBMCJournal of Translational Medicine1479-58762017-06-0115111110.1186/s12967-017-1235-3Development of an objective gene expression panel as an alternative to self-reported symptom scores in human influenza challenge trialsJulius Muller0Eneida Parizotto1Richard Antrobus2James Francis3Campbell Bunce4Amanda Stranks5Marshall Nichols6Micah McClain7Adrian V. S. Hill8Adaikalavan Ramasamy9Sarah C. Gilbert10The Jenner Institute, University of OxfordThe Jenner Institute, University of OxfordThe Jenner Institute, University of OxfordImmune Targeting Systems Ltd (now AltImmune Ltd), 2 Royal College StreetImmune Targeting Systems Ltd (now AltImmune Ltd), 2 Royal College StreetThe Jenner Institute, University of OxfordCenter for Applied Genomics and Precision Medicine, Duke University Medical CentreCenter for Applied Genomics and Precision Medicine, Duke University Medical CentreThe Jenner Institute, University of OxfordThe Jenner Institute, University of OxfordThe Jenner Institute, University of OxfordAbstract Background Influenza challenge trials are important for vaccine efficacy testing. Currently, disease severity is determined by self-reported scores to a list of symptoms which can be highly subjective. A more objective measure would allow for improved data analysis. Methods Twenty-one volunteers participated in an influenza challenge trial. We calculated the daily sum of scores (DSS) for a list of 16 influenza symptoms. Whole blood collected at baseline and 24, 48, 72 and 96 h post challenge was profiled on Illumina HT12v4 microarrays. Changes in gene expression most strongly correlated with DSS were selected to train a Random Forest model and tested on two independent test sets consisting of 41 individuals profiled on a different microarray platform and 33 volunteers assayed by qRT-PCR. Results 1456 probes are significantly associated with DSS at 1% false discovery rate. We selected 19 genes with the largest fold change to train a random forest model. We observed good concordance between predicted and actual scores in the first test set (r = 0.57; RMSE = −16.1%) with the greatest agreement achieved on samples collected approximately 72 h post challenge. Therefore, we assayed samples collected at baseline and 72 h post challenge in the second test set by qRT-PCR and observed good concordance (r = 0.81; RMSE = −36.1%). Conclusions We developed a 19-gene qRT-PCR panel to predict DSS, validated on two independent datasets. A transcriptomics based panel could provide a more objective measure of symptom scoring in future influenza challenge studies. Trial registration Samples were obtained from a clinical trial with the ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02014870, first registered on December 5, 2013http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12967-017-1235-3InfluenzaChallenge trialSymptom scoresBiomarkerTranscriptomics
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Julius Muller
Eneida Parizotto
Richard Antrobus
James Francis
Campbell Bunce
Amanda Stranks
Marshall Nichols
Micah McClain
Adrian V. S. Hill
Adaikalavan Ramasamy
Sarah C. Gilbert
spellingShingle Julius Muller
Eneida Parizotto
Richard Antrobus
James Francis
Campbell Bunce
Amanda Stranks
Marshall Nichols
Micah McClain
Adrian V. S. Hill
Adaikalavan Ramasamy
Sarah C. Gilbert
Development of an objective gene expression panel as an alternative to self-reported symptom scores in human influenza challenge trials
Journal of Translational Medicine
Influenza
Challenge trial
Symptom scores
Biomarker
Transcriptomics
author_facet Julius Muller
Eneida Parizotto
Richard Antrobus
James Francis
Campbell Bunce
Amanda Stranks
Marshall Nichols
Micah McClain
Adrian V. S. Hill
Adaikalavan Ramasamy
Sarah C. Gilbert
author_sort Julius Muller
title Development of an objective gene expression panel as an alternative to self-reported symptom scores in human influenza challenge trials
title_short Development of an objective gene expression panel as an alternative to self-reported symptom scores in human influenza challenge trials
title_full Development of an objective gene expression panel as an alternative to self-reported symptom scores in human influenza challenge trials
title_fullStr Development of an objective gene expression panel as an alternative to self-reported symptom scores in human influenza challenge trials
title_full_unstemmed Development of an objective gene expression panel as an alternative to self-reported symptom scores in human influenza challenge trials
title_sort development of an objective gene expression panel as an alternative to self-reported symptom scores in human influenza challenge trials
publisher BMC
series Journal of Translational Medicine
issn 1479-5876
publishDate 2017-06-01
description Abstract Background Influenza challenge trials are important for vaccine efficacy testing. Currently, disease severity is determined by self-reported scores to a list of symptoms which can be highly subjective. A more objective measure would allow for improved data analysis. Methods Twenty-one volunteers participated in an influenza challenge trial. We calculated the daily sum of scores (DSS) for a list of 16 influenza symptoms. Whole blood collected at baseline and 24, 48, 72 and 96 h post challenge was profiled on Illumina HT12v4 microarrays. Changes in gene expression most strongly correlated with DSS were selected to train a Random Forest model and tested on two independent test sets consisting of 41 individuals profiled on a different microarray platform and 33 volunteers assayed by qRT-PCR. Results 1456 probes are significantly associated with DSS at 1% false discovery rate. We selected 19 genes with the largest fold change to train a random forest model. We observed good concordance between predicted and actual scores in the first test set (r = 0.57; RMSE = −16.1%) with the greatest agreement achieved on samples collected approximately 72 h post challenge. Therefore, we assayed samples collected at baseline and 72 h post challenge in the second test set by qRT-PCR and observed good concordance (r = 0.81; RMSE = −36.1%). Conclusions We developed a 19-gene qRT-PCR panel to predict DSS, validated on two independent datasets. A transcriptomics based panel could provide a more objective measure of symptom scoring in future influenza challenge studies. Trial registration Samples were obtained from a clinical trial with the ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02014870, first registered on December 5, 2013
topic Influenza
Challenge trial
Symptom scores
Biomarker
Transcriptomics
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12967-017-1235-3
work_keys_str_mv AT juliusmuller developmentofanobjectivegeneexpressionpanelasanalternativetoselfreportedsymptomscoresinhumaninfluenzachallengetrials
AT eneidaparizotto developmentofanobjectivegeneexpressionpanelasanalternativetoselfreportedsymptomscoresinhumaninfluenzachallengetrials
AT richardantrobus developmentofanobjectivegeneexpressionpanelasanalternativetoselfreportedsymptomscoresinhumaninfluenzachallengetrials
AT jamesfrancis developmentofanobjectivegeneexpressionpanelasanalternativetoselfreportedsymptomscoresinhumaninfluenzachallengetrials
AT campbellbunce developmentofanobjectivegeneexpressionpanelasanalternativetoselfreportedsymptomscoresinhumaninfluenzachallengetrials
AT amandastranks developmentofanobjectivegeneexpressionpanelasanalternativetoselfreportedsymptomscoresinhumaninfluenzachallengetrials
AT marshallnichols developmentofanobjectivegeneexpressionpanelasanalternativetoselfreportedsymptomscoresinhumaninfluenzachallengetrials
AT micahmcclain developmentofanobjectivegeneexpressionpanelasanalternativetoselfreportedsymptomscoresinhumaninfluenzachallengetrials
AT adrianvshill developmentofanobjectivegeneexpressionpanelasanalternativetoselfreportedsymptomscoresinhumaninfluenzachallengetrials
AT adaikalavanramasamy developmentofanobjectivegeneexpressionpanelasanalternativetoselfreportedsymptomscoresinhumaninfluenzachallengetrials
AT sarahcgilbert developmentofanobjectivegeneexpressionpanelasanalternativetoselfreportedsymptomscoresinhumaninfluenzachallengetrials
_version_ 1716791218923372544