Development of an objective gene expression panel as an alternative to self-reported symptom scores in human influenza challenge trials
Abstract Background Influenza challenge trials are important for vaccine efficacy testing. Currently, disease severity is determined by self-reported scores to a list of symptoms which can be highly subjective. A more objective measure would allow for improved data analysis. Methods Twenty-one volun...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2017-06-01
|
Series: | Journal of Translational Medicine |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12967-017-1235-3 |
id |
doaj-cd2fcc31758143c78c36ae492fe23e7f |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-cd2fcc31758143c78c36ae492fe23e7f2020-11-24T20:55:59ZengBMCJournal of Translational Medicine1479-58762017-06-0115111110.1186/s12967-017-1235-3Development of an objective gene expression panel as an alternative to self-reported symptom scores in human influenza challenge trialsJulius Muller0Eneida Parizotto1Richard Antrobus2James Francis3Campbell Bunce4Amanda Stranks5Marshall Nichols6Micah McClain7Adrian V. S. Hill8Adaikalavan Ramasamy9Sarah C. Gilbert10The Jenner Institute, University of OxfordThe Jenner Institute, University of OxfordThe Jenner Institute, University of OxfordImmune Targeting Systems Ltd (now AltImmune Ltd), 2 Royal College StreetImmune Targeting Systems Ltd (now AltImmune Ltd), 2 Royal College StreetThe Jenner Institute, University of OxfordCenter for Applied Genomics and Precision Medicine, Duke University Medical CentreCenter for Applied Genomics and Precision Medicine, Duke University Medical CentreThe Jenner Institute, University of OxfordThe Jenner Institute, University of OxfordThe Jenner Institute, University of OxfordAbstract Background Influenza challenge trials are important for vaccine efficacy testing. Currently, disease severity is determined by self-reported scores to a list of symptoms which can be highly subjective. A more objective measure would allow for improved data analysis. Methods Twenty-one volunteers participated in an influenza challenge trial. We calculated the daily sum of scores (DSS) for a list of 16 influenza symptoms. Whole blood collected at baseline and 24, 48, 72 and 96 h post challenge was profiled on Illumina HT12v4 microarrays. Changes in gene expression most strongly correlated with DSS were selected to train a Random Forest model and tested on two independent test sets consisting of 41 individuals profiled on a different microarray platform and 33 volunteers assayed by qRT-PCR. Results 1456 probes are significantly associated with DSS at 1% false discovery rate. We selected 19 genes with the largest fold change to train a random forest model. We observed good concordance between predicted and actual scores in the first test set (r = 0.57; RMSE = −16.1%) with the greatest agreement achieved on samples collected approximately 72 h post challenge. Therefore, we assayed samples collected at baseline and 72 h post challenge in the second test set by qRT-PCR and observed good concordance (r = 0.81; RMSE = −36.1%). Conclusions We developed a 19-gene qRT-PCR panel to predict DSS, validated on two independent datasets. A transcriptomics based panel could provide a more objective measure of symptom scoring in future influenza challenge studies. Trial registration Samples were obtained from a clinical trial with the ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02014870, first registered on December 5, 2013http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12967-017-1235-3InfluenzaChallenge trialSymptom scoresBiomarkerTranscriptomics |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Julius Muller Eneida Parizotto Richard Antrobus James Francis Campbell Bunce Amanda Stranks Marshall Nichols Micah McClain Adrian V. S. Hill Adaikalavan Ramasamy Sarah C. Gilbert |
spellingShingle |
Julius Muller Eneida Parizotto Richard Antrobus James Francis Campbell Bunce Amanda Stranks Marshall Nichols Micah McClain Adrian V. S. Hill Adaikalavan Ramasamy Sarah C. Gilbert Development of an objective gene expression panel as an alternative to self-reported symptom scores in human influenza challenge trials Journal of Translational Medicine Influenza Challenge trial Symptom scores Biomarker Transcriptomics |
author_facet |
Julius Muller Eneida Parizotto Richard Antrobus James Francis Campbell Bunce Amanda Stranks Marshall Nichols Micah McClain Adrian V. S. Hill Adaikalavan Ramasamy Sarah C. Gilbert |
author_sort |
Julius Muller |
title |
Development of an objective gene expression panel as an alternative to self-reported symptom scores in human influenza challenge trials |
title_short |
Development of an objective gene expression panel as an alternative to self-reported symptom scores in human influenza challenge trials |
title_full |
Development of an objective gene expression panel as an alternative to self-reported symptom scores in human influenza challenge trials |
title_fullStr |
Development of an objective gene expression panel as an alternative to self-reported symptom scores in human influenza challenge trials |
title_full_unstemmed |
Development of an objective gene expression panel as an alternative to self-reported symptom scores in human influenza challenge trials |
title_sort |
development of an objective gene expression panel as an alternative to self-reported symptom scores in human influenza challenge trials |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
Journal of Translational Medicine |
issn |
1479-5876 |
publishDate |
2017-06-01 |
description |
Abstract Background Influenza challenge trials are important for vaccine efficacy testing. Currently, disease severity is determined by self-reported scores to a list of symptoms which can be highly subjective. A more objective measure would allow for improved data analysis. Methods Twenty-one volunteers participated in an influenza challenge trial. We calculated the daily sum of scores (DSS) for a list of 16 influenza symptoms. Whole blood collected at baseline and 24, 48, 72 and 96 h post challenge was profiled on Illumina HT12v4 microarrays. Changes in gene expression most strongly correlated with DSS were selected to train a Random Forest model and tested on two independent test sets consisting of 41 individuals profiled on a different microarray platform and 33 volunteers assayed by qRT-PCR. Results 1456 probes are significantly associated with DSS at 1% false discovery rate. We selected 19 genes with the largest fold change to train a random forest model. We observed good concordance between predicted and actual scores in the first test set (r = 0.57; RMSE = −16.1%) with the greatest agreement achieved on samples collected approximately 72 h post challenge. Therefore, we assayed samples collected at baseline and 72 h post challenge in the second test set by qRT-PCR and observed good concordance (r = 0.81; RMSE = −36.1%). Conclusions We developed a 19-gene qRT-PCR panel to predict DSS, validated on two independent datasets. A transcriptomics based panel could provide a more objective measure of symptom scoring in future influenza challenge studies. Trial registration Samples were obtained from a clinical trial with the ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02014870, first registered on December 5, 2013 |
topic |
Influenza Challenge trial Symptom scores Biomarker Transcriptomics |
url |
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12967-017-1235-3 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT juliusmuller developmentofanobjectivegeneexpressionpanelasanalternativetoselfreportedsymptomscoresinhumaninfluenzachallengetrials AT eneidaparizotto developmentofanobjectivegeneexpressionpanelasanalternativetoselfreportedsymptomscoresinhumaninfluenzachallengetrials AT richardantrobus developmentofanobjectivegeneexpressionpanelasanalternativetoselfreportedsymptomscoresinhumaninfluenzachallengetrials AT jamesfrancis developmentofanobjectivegeneexpressionpanelasanalternativetoselfreportedsymptomscoresinhumaninfluenzachallengetrials AT campbellbunce developmentofanobjectivegeneexpressionpanelasanalternativetoselfreportedsymptomscoresinhumaninfluenzachallengetrials AT amandastranks developmentofanobjectivegeneexpressionpanelasanalternativetoselfreportedsymptomscoresinhumaninfluenzachallengetrials AT marshallnichols developmentofanobjectivegeneexpressionpanelasanalternativetoselfreportedsymptomscoresinhumaninfluenzachallengetrials AT micahmcclain developmentofanobjectivegeneexpressionpanelasanalternativetoselfreportedsymptomscoresinhumaninfluenzachallengetrials AT adrianvshill developmentofanobjectivegeneexpressionpanelasanalternativetoselfreportedsymptomscoresinhumaninfluenzachallengetrials AT adaikalavanramasamy developmentofanobjectivegeneexpressionpanelasanalternativetoselfreportedsymptomscoresinhumaninfluenzachallengetrials AT sarahcgilbert developmentofanobjectivegeneexpressionpanelasanalternativetoselfreportedsymptomscoresinhumaninfluenzachallengetrials |
_version_ |
1716791218923372544 |