Micro-targeting, the quantified persuasion

During the past three decades there has been a persistent, and dark, narrative about political micro-targeting. But while it might seem that the micro-targeting practices of campaigns have massive, and un-democratic, electoral effects, decades of work in political communication should give us pause....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Daniel Kreiss
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society 2017-12-01
Series:Internet Policy Review
Online Access:https://policyreview.info/node/774
id doaj-cbfd4108610b42939d6342576461df25
record_format Article
spelling doaj-cbfd4108610b42939d6342576461df252021-06-01T12:43:59ZengAlexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and SocietyInternet Policy Review2197-67752017-12-01Volume 6Issue 410.14763/2017.4.774Micro-targeting, the quantified persuasionDaniel Kreiss0University of North Carolina at Chapel HillDuring the past three decades there has been a persistent, and dark, narrative about political micro-targeting. But while it might seem that the micro-targeting practices of campaigns have massive, and un-democratic, electoral effects, decades of work in political communication should give us pause. What explains the outsized concerns about micro-targeting in the face of the generally thin evidence of its widespread and pernicious effects? This essay argues that we have anxieties about micro-targeting because we have anxieties about democracy itself. Or, to put it differently, that scholars often hold up an idealised vision of democracy as the standard upon which to judge all political communication.https://policyreview.info/node/774
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Daniel Kreiss
spellingShingle Daniel Kreiss
Micro-targeting, the quantified persuasion
Internet Policy Review
author_facet Daniel Kreiss
author_sort Daniel Kreiss
title Micro-targeting, the quantified persuasion
title_short Micro-targeting, the quantified persuasion
title_full Micro-targeting, the quantified persuasion
title_fullStr Micro-targeting, the quantified persuasion
title_full_unstemmed Micro-targeting, the quantified persuasion
title_sort micro-targeting, the quantified persuasion
publisher Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society
series Internet Policy Review
issn 2197-6775
publishDate 2017-12-01
description During the past three decades there has been a persistent, and dark, narrative about political micro-targeting. But while it might seem that the micro-targeting practices of campaigns have massive, and un-democratic, electoral effects, decades of work in political communication should give us pause. What explains the outsized concerns about micro-targeting in the face of the generally thin evidence of its widespread and pernicious effects? This essay argues that we have anxieties about micro-targeting because we have anxieties about democracy itself. Or, to put it differently, that scholars often hold up an idealised vision of democracy as the standard upon which to judge all political communication.
url https://policyreview.info/node/774
work_keys_str_mv AT danielkreiss microtargetingthequantifiedpersuasion
_version_ 1721410750184947712