Micro-targeting, the quantified persuasion
During the past three decades there has been a persistent, and dark, narrative about political micro-targeting. But while it might seem that the micro-targeting practices of campaigns have massive, and un-democratic, electoral effects, decades of work in political communication should give us pause....
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society
2017-12-01
|
Series: | Internet Policy Review |
Online Access: | https://policyreview.info/node/774 |
id |
doaj-cbfd4108610b42939d6342576461df25 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-cbfd4108610b42939d6342576461df252021-06-01T12:43:59ZengAlexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and SocietyInternet Policy Review2197-67752017-12-01Volume 6Issue 410.14763/2017.4.774Micro-targeting, the quantified persuasionDaniel Kreiss0University of North Carolina at Chapel HillDuring the past three decades there has been a persistent, and dark, narrative about political micro-targeting. But while it might seem that the micro-targeting practices of campaigns have massive, and un-democratic, electoral effects, decades of work in political communication should give us pause. What explains the outsized concerns about micro-targeting in the face of the generally thin evidence of its widespread and pernicious effects? This essay argues that we have anxieties about micro-targeting because we have anxieties about democracy itself. Or, to put it differently, that scholars often hold up an idealised vision of democracy as the standard upon which to judge all political communication.https://policyreview.info/node/774 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Daniel Kreiss |
spellingShingle |
Daniel Kreiss Micro-targeting, the quantified persuasion Internet Policy Review |
author_facet |
Daniel Kreiss |
author_sort |
Daniel Kreiss |
title |
Micro-targeting, the quantified persuasion |
title_short |
Micro-targeting, the quantified persuasion |
title_full |
Micro-targeting, the quantified persuasion |
title_fullStr |
Micro-targeting, the quantified persuasion |
title_full_unstemmed |
Micro-targeting, the quantified persuasion |
title_sort |
micro-targeting, the quantified persuasion |
publisher |
Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society |
series |
Internet Policy Review |
issn |
2197-6775 |
publishDate |
2017-12-01 |
description |
During the past three decades there has been a persistent, and dark, narrative about political micro-targeting. But while it might seem that the micro-targeting practices of campaigns have massive, and un-democratic, electoral effects, decades of work in political communication should give us pause. What explains the outsized concerns about micro-targeting in the face of the generally thin evidence of its widespread and pernicious effects? This essay argues that we have anxieties about micro-targeting because we have anxieties about democracy itself. Or, to put it differently, that scholars often hold up an idealised vision of democracy as the standard upon which to judge all political communication. |
url |
https://policyreview.info/node/774 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT danielkreiss microtargetingthequantifiedpersuasion |
_version_ |
1721410750184947712 |