Students and Supervisors’ Evaluation of Online International Doctoral Supervision

This research presents the initial results of a study on the processes of online PhD supervision in the Education Sciences field. Remote mentoring and supervision bring new problems to the delivery of high-level doctoral studies with a widely dispersed base of mature, part-time, international studen...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jesús Salinas
Format: Article
Language:Spanish
Published: Universidad Nacional, Costa Rica 2017-09-01
Series:Revista Electronic@ Educare
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.revistas.una.ac.cr/index.php/EDUCARE/article/view/8015
id doaj-cb8c8412783c4c72b695aabb8c86b155
record_format Article
spelling doaj-cb8c8412783c4c72b695aabb8c86b1552020-11-25T03:46:28ZspaUniversidad Nacional, Costa RicaRevista Electronic@ Educare1409-42582017-09-0122112310.15359/ree.22-1.49290Students and Supervisors’ Evaluation of Online International Doctoral SupervisionJesús Salinas0Universidad de las Islas BalearesThis research presents the initial results of a study on the processes of online PhD supervision in the Education Sciences field. Remote mentoring and supervision bring new problems to the delivery of high-level doctoral studies with a widely dispersed base of mature, part-time, international students. These processes are analyzed by taking into account the supervision dynamics, the communication and support systems used, the activity space developed, and the tools used. For this exploratory study, we opted for a semi-structured interview; open ended at first, but to which some closed questions were added (especially questions to order or statements to evaluate). Twenty-six supervisors and students were interviewed, affording a view from both sides, so as to better understand the process and its difficulties. A classification system was set up afterwards, using notes taken on the spot in the interviews, and, later on, the categories were applied to the interview transcripts. Key elements have been identified, in which to intervene to improve the process. By taking into account the supervisors’ and students’ points of view, a certain coincidence could be observed when identifying such elements, both in relation to the style of supervision and support to the process, as well as to the dynamics, or susceptible tools and applications to improve the process; although both groups do not attribute the same value.http://www.revistas.una.ac.cr/index.php/EDUCARE/article/view/8015Métodos de supervisiónprogramas de doctoradosupervisión de doctoradosupervisión online, formación en investigación.
collection DOAJ
language Spanish
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jesús Salinas
spellingShingle Jesús Salinas
Students and Supervisors’ Evaluation of Online International Doctoral Supervision
Revista Electronic@ Educare
Métodos de supervisión
programas de doctorado
supervisión de doctorado
supervisión online, formación en investigación.
author_facet Jesús Salinas
author_sort Jesús Salinas
title Students and Supervisors’ Evaluation of Online International Doctoral Supervision
title_short Students and Supervisors’ Evaluation of Online International Doctoral Supervision
title_full Students and Supervisors’ Evaluation of Online International Doctoral Supervision
title_fullStr Students and Supervisors’ Evaluation of Online International Doctoral Supervision
title_full_unstemmed Students and Supervisors’ Evaluation of Online International Doctoral Supervision
title_sort students and supervisors’ evaluation of online international doctoral supervision
publisher Universidad Nacional, Costa Rica
series Revista Electronic@ Educare
issn 1409-4258
publishDate 2017-09-01
description This research presents the initial results of a study on the processes of online PhD supervision in the Education Sciences field. Remote mentoring and supervision bring new problems to the delivery of high-level doctoral studies with a widely dispersed base of mature, part-time, international students. These processes are analyzed by taking into account the supervision dynamics, the communication and support systems used, the activity space developed, and the tools used. For this exploratory study, we opted for a semi-structured interview; open ended at first, but to which some closed questions were added (especially questions to order or statements to evaluate). Twenty-six supervisors and students were interviewed, affording a view from both sides, so as to better understand the process and its difficulties. A classification system was set up afterwards, using notes taken on the spot in the interviews, and, later on, the categories were applied to the interview transcripts. Key elements have been identified, in which to intervene to improve the process. By taking into account the supervisors’ and students’ points of view, a certain coincidence could be observed when identifying such elements, both in relation to the style of supervision and support to the process, as well as to the dynamics, or susceptible tools and applications to improve the process; although both groups do not attribute the same value.
topic Métodos de supervisión
programas de doctorado
supervisión de doctorado
supervisión online, formación en investigación.
url http://www.revistas.una.ac.cr/index.php/EDUCARE/article/view/8015
work_keys_str_mv AT jesussalinas studentsandsupervisorsevaluationofonlineinternationaldoctoralsupervision
_version_ 1724506329929744384