Stereotactic radiosurgery optimization with hippocampal-sparing in patients treated for brain metastases

Background and purpose: Cranial irradiation is associated with significant neurocognitive sequelae, secondary to radiation-induced damage to hippocampal cells. It has been shown that hippocampal-sparing (HS) leads to modest benefit in neurocognitive function in patients with brain metastases, but fu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Laura Burgess, Vimoj Nair, Julie Gratton, Janice Doody, Lynn Chang, Shawn Malone
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2021-01-01
Series:Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631621000130
id doaj-c8bdca95d84049f0886b1c22d23f0ad8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c8bdca95d84049f0886b1c22d23f0ad82021-03-19T07:27:20ZengElsevierPhysics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology2405-63162021-01-0117106110Stereotactic radiosurgery optimization with hippocampal-sparing in patients treated for brain metastasesLaura Burgess0Vimoj Nair1Julie Gratton2Janice Doody3Lynn Chang4Shawn Malone5Department of Radiology, Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Ottawa, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, Ontario K1H8L6, Canada; The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, Ontario K1H8L6, Canada; Corresponding author at: 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, Ontario K1H8L6, Canada.Department of Radiology, Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Ottawa, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, Ontario K1H8L6, Canada; The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, Ontario K1H8L6, CanadaThe Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, Ontario K1H8L6, CanadaThe Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, Ontario K1H8L6, CanadaDepartment of Radiology, Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Ottawa, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, Ontario K1H8L6, Canada; The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, Ontario K1H8L6, CanadaThe Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, Ontario K1H8L6, CanadaBackground and purpose: Cranial irradiation is associated with significant neurocognitive sequelae, secondary to radiation-induced damage to hippocampal cells. It has been shown that hippocampal-sparing (HS) leads to modest benefit in neurocognitive function in patients with brain metastases, but further improvement is possible. We hypothesized that improved benefits could be seen using HS in patients treated with stereotactic radiation (HS-SRS). Our study evaluated whether the hippocampal dose could be significantly reduced in the treatment of brain metastases using SRS, while maintaining target coverage. Materials and methods: Sixty SRS plans were re-planned to minimize dose to the hippocampus while maintaining target coverage. Patients with metastases within 5 mm of the hippocampus were excluded. Minimum, mean, maximum and dose to 40% (mean equivalent dose in 2 Gy per fraction, EQD2 to the hippocampus) were compared between SRS and HS-SRS plans. Median number of brain metastases was two. Results: Compared to baseline SRS plans, hippocampal-sparing plans demonstrated Dmin was reduced by 35%, from 0.4 Gy to 0.3 Gy (p-value 0.02). Similarly, Dmax was reduced by 55%, from 8.2 Gy to 3.6 Gy, Dmean by 52%, from 1.6 Gy to 0.5 Gy, and D40 by 50%, from 1.8 Gy to 0.9 Gy (p-values <0.001). Conclusions: Our study demonstrated that further reduction of hippocampal doses of more than 50% is possible in the treatment of brain metastases with SRS using dose optimization. This could result in significantly improved neurocognitive outcomes for patients treated for brain metastases.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631621000130Stereotactic radiosurgeryBrain metastasesQuality of lifeHippocampal-sparingNeurocognitive sequelae
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Laura Burgess
Vimoj Nair
Julie Gratton
Janice Doody
Lynn Chang
Shawn Malone
spellingShingle Laura Burgess
Vimoj Nair
Julie Gratton
Janice Doody
Lynn Chang
Shawn Malone
Stereotactic radiosurgery optimization with hippocampal-sparing in patients treated for brain metastases
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Stereotactic radiosurgery
Brain metastases
Quality of life
Hippocampal-sparing
Neurocognitive sequelae
author_facet Laura Burgess
Vimoj Nair
Julie Gratton
Janice Doody
Lynn Chang
Shawn Malone
author_sort Laura Burgess
title Stereotactic radiosurgery optimization with hippocampal-sparing in patients treated for brain metastases
title_short Stereotactic radiosurgery optimization with hippocampal-sparing in patients treated for brain metastases
title_full Stereotactic radiosurgery optimization with hippocampal-sparing in patients treated for brain metastases
title_fullStr Stereotactic radiosurgery optimization with hippocampal-sparing in patients treated for brain metastases
title_full_unstemmed Stereotactic radiosurgery optimization with hippocampal-sparing in patients treated for brain metastases
title_sort stereotactic radiosurgery optimization with hippocampal-sparing in patients treated for brain metastases
publisher Elsevier
series Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
issn 2405-6316
publishDate 2021-01-01
description Background and purpose: Cranial irradiation is associated with significant neurocognitive sequelae, secondary to radiation-induced damage to hippocampal cells. It has been shown that hippocampal-sparing (HS) leads to modest benefit in neurocognitive function in patients with brain metastases, but further improvement is possible. We hypothesized that improved benefits could be seen using HS in patients treated with stereotactic radiation (HS-SRS). Our study evaluated whether the hippocampal dose could be significantly reduced in the treatment of brain metastases using SRS, while maintaining target coverage. Materials and methods: Sixty SRS plans were re-planned to minimize dose to the hippocampus while maintaining target coverage. Patients with metastases within 5 mm of the hippocampus were excluded. Minimum, mean, maximum and dose to 40% (mean equivalent dose in 2 Gy per fraction, EQD2 to the hippocampus) were compared between SRS and HS-SRS plans. Median number of brain metastases was two. Results: Compared to baseline SRS plans, hippocampal-sparing plans demonstrated Dmin was reduced by 35%, from 0.4 Gy to 0.3 Gy (p-value 0.02). Similarly, Dmax was reduced by 55%, from 8.2 Gy to 3.6 Gy, Dmean by 52%, from 1.6 Gy to 0.5 Gy, and D40 by 50%, from 1.8 Gy to 0.9 Gy (p-values <0.001). Conclusions: Our study demonstrated that further reduction of hippocampal doses of more than 50% is possible in the treatment of brain metastases with SRS using dose optimization. This could result in significantly improved neurocognitive outcomes for patients treated for brain metastases.
topic Stereotactic radiosurgery
Brain metastases
Quality of life
Hippocampal-sparing
Neurocognitive sequelae
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631621000130
work_keys_str_mv AT lauraburgess stereotacticradiosurgeryoptimizationwithhippocampalsparinginpatientstreatedforbrainmetastases
AT vimojnair stereotacticradiosurgeryoptimizationwithhippocampalsparinginpatientstreatedforbrainmetastases
AT juliegratton stereotacticradiosurgeryoptimizationwithhippocampalsparinginpatientstreatedforbrainmetastases
AT janicedoody stereotacticradiosurgeryoptimizationwithhippocampalsparinginpatientstreatedforbrainmetastases
AT lynnchang stereotacticradiosurgeryoptimizationwithhippocampalsparinginpatientstreatedforbrainmetastases
AT shawnmalone stereotacticradiosurgeryoptimizationwithhippocampalsparinginpatientstreatedforbrainmetastases
_version_ 1724213354067656704