A systematic summary and comparison of animal models for chemotherapy induced (peripheral) neuropathy (CIPN).

Despite the large amount of human and experimental studies no effective (prophylactic) treatment exists for chemotherapy induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN), a disabling side effect of many cancer treatments. One of the underlying reasons for this could be that often the preclinical animal models u...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Suvarna Gadgil, Mehmet Ergün, Sandra A van den Heuvel, Selina E van der Wal, Gert Jan Scheffer, Carlijn R Hooijmans
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2019-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221787
id doaj-c76ea3ac7bb94d76991b12ca75f3a3e9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c76ea3ac7bb94d76991b12ca75f3a3e92021-03-03T19:50:57ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032019-01-01148e022178710.1371/journal.pone.0221787A systematic summary and comparison of animal models for chemotherapy induced (peripheral) neuropathy (CIPN).Suvarna GadgilMehmet ErgünSandra A van den HeuvelSelina E van der WalGert Jan SchefferCarlijn R HooijmansDespite the large amount of human and experimental studies no effective (prophylactic) treatment exists for chemotherapy induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN), a disabling side effect of many cancer treatments. One of the underlying reasons for this could be that often the preclinical animal models used are not the best representation of the clinical situation. We therefore present a systematic summary and comparison of all animal models currently described in literature for CIPN focusing on stimulus evoked pain-like behaviour and neurophysiological alterations in nerve function (650 included papers, and a comparison of 183 models), that resulted in a clear overview of the most effective and robust CIPN models using an administration route used in clinical practice. Using our three-step approach (step 1: efficacy; step; 2 robustness and step 3: mimicking the clinical situation) we show that all mice CIPN models treated with either paclitaxel or cisplatin using an administration route used in clinical practice seem suitable models. Three specific models using paclitaxel or cisplatin that stand out are 1) C57BL/6 female mice receiving paclitaxel and 2) CD1 male mice receiving paclitaxel and 3) C57BL/6 male mice receiving cisplatin. This overview may help scientists selecting suitable CIPN models for their research. We hypothesize that by using effective and robust animal models that mimic the clinical situation as much as possible, the translational value of preclinical study results with respect to the potential of identifying promising treatments for CIPN in the future, will prove. The methodology described in this paper, aimed at comparing animal models, is novel and can be used by scientist in other research fields as well.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221787
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Suvarna Gadgil
Mehmet Ergün
Sandra A van den Heuvel
Selina E van der Wal
Gert Jan Scheffer
Carlijn R Hooijmans
spellingShingle Suvarna Gadgil
Mehmet Ergün
Sandra A van den Heuvel
Selina E van der Wal
Gert Jan Scheffer
Carlijn R Hooijmans
A systematic summary and comparison of animal models for chemotherapy induced (peripheral) neuropathy (CIPN).
PLoS ONE
author_facet Suvarna Gadgil
Mehmet Ergün
Sandra A van den Heuvel
Selina E van der Wal
Gert Jan Scheffer
Carlijn R Hooijmans
author_sort Suvarna Gadgil
title A systematic summary and comparison of animal models for chemotherapy induced (peripheral) neuropathy (CIPN).
title_short A systematic summary and comparison of animal models for chemotherapy induced (peripheral) neuropathy (CIPN).
title_full A systematic summary and comparison of animal models for chemotherapy induced (peripheral) neuropathy (CIPN).
title_fullStr A systematic summary and comparison of animal models for chemotherapy induced (peripheral) neuropathy (CIPN).
title_full_unstemmed A systematic summary and comparison of animal models for chemotherapy induced (peripheral) neuropathy (CIPN).
title_sort systematic summary and comparison of animal models for chemotherapy induced (peripheral) neuropathy (cipn).
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2019-01-01
description Despite the large amount of human and experimental studies no effective (prophylactic) treatment exists for chemotherapy induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN), a disabling side effect of many cancer treatments. One of the underlying reasons for this could be that often the preclinical animal models used are not the best representation of the clinical situation. We therefore present a systematic summary and comparison of all animal models currently described in literature for CIPN focusing on stimulus evoked pain-like behaviour and neurophysiological alterations in nerve function (650 included papers, and a comparison of 183 models), that resulted in a clear overview of the most effective and robust CIPN models using an administration route used in clinical practice. Using our three-step approach (step 1: efficacy; step; 2 robustness and step 3: mimicking the clinical situation) we show that all mice CIPN models treated with either paclitaxel or cisplatin using an administration route used in clinical practice seem suitable models. Three specific models using paclitaxel or cisplatin that stand out are 1) C57BL/6 female mice receiving paclitaxel and 2) CD1 male mice receiving paclitaxel and 3) C57BL/6 male mice receiving cisplatin. This overview may help scientists selecting suitable CIPN models for their research. We hypothesize that by using effective and robust animal models that mimic the clinical situation as much as possible, the translational value of preclinical study results with respect to the potential of identifying promising treatments for CIPN in the future, will prove. The methodology described in this paper, aimed at comparing animal models, is novel and can be used by scientist in other research fields as well.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221787
work_keys_str_mv AT suvarnagadgil asystematicsummaryandcomparisonofanimalmodelsforchemotherapyinducedperipheralneuropathycipn
AT mehmetergun asystematicsummaryandcomparisonofanimalmodelsforchemotherapyinducedperipheralneuropathycipn
AT sandraavandenheuvel asystematicsummaryandcomparisonofanimalmodelsforchemotherapyinducedperipheralneuropathycipn
AT selinaevanderwal asystematicsummaryandcomparisonofanimalmodelsforchemotherapyinducedperipheralneuropathycipn
AT gertjanscheffer asystematicsummaryandcomparisonofanimalmodelsforchemotherapyinducedperipheralneuropathycipn
AT carlijnrhooijmans asystematicsummaryandcomparisonofanimalmodelsforchemotherapyinducedperipheralneuropathycipn
AT suvarnagadgil systematicsummaryandcomparisonofanimalmodelsforchemotherapyinducedperipheralneuropathycipn
AT mehmetergun systematicsummaryandcomparisonofanimalmodelsforchemotherapyinducedperipheralneuropathycipn
AT sandraavandenheuvel systematicsummaryandcomparisonofanimalmodelsforchemotherapyinducedperipheralneuropathycipn
AT selinaevanderwal systematicsummaryandcomparisonofanimalmodelsforchemotherapyinducedperipheralneuropathycipn
AT gertjanscheffer systematicsummaryandcomparisonofanimalmodelsforchemotherapyinducedperipheralneuropathycipn
AT carlijnrhooijmans systematicsummaryandcomparisonofanimalmodelsforchemotherapyinducedperipheralneuropathycipn
_version_ 1714825473994784768