A systematic summary and comparison of animal models for chemotherapy induced (peripheral) neuropathy (CIPN).
Despite the large amount of human and experimental studies no effective (prophylactic) treatment exists for chemotherapy induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN), a disabling side effect of many cancer treatments. One of the underlying reasons for this could be that often the preclinical animal models u...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2019-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221787 |
id |
doaj-c76ea3ac7bb94d76991b12ca75f3a3e9 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-c76ea3ac7bb94d76991b12ca75f3a3e92021-03-03T19:50:57ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032019-01-01148e022178710.1371/journal.pone.0221787A systematic summary and comparison of animal models for chemotherapy induced (peripheral) neuropathy (CIPN).Suvarna GadgilMehmet ErgünSandra A van den HeuvelSelina E van der WalGert Jan SchefferCarlijn R HooijmansDespite the large amount of human and experimental studies no effective (prophylactic) treatment exists for chemotherapy induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN), a disabling side effect of many cancer treatments. One of the underlying reasons for this could be that often the preclinical animal models used are not the best representation of the clinical situation. We therefore present a systematic summary and comparison of all animal models currently described in literature for CIPN focusing on stimulus evoked pain-like behaviour and neurophysiological alterations in nerve function (650 included papers, and a comparison of 183 models), that resulted in a clear overview of the most effective and robust CIPN models using an administration route used in clinical practice. Using our three-step approach (step 1: efficacy; step; 2 robustness and step 3: mimicking the clinical situation) we show that all mice CIPN models treated with either paclitaxel or cisplatin using an administration route used in clinical practice seem suitable models. Three specific models using paclitaxel or cisplatin that stand out are 1) C57BL/6 female mice receiving paclitaxel and 2) CD1 male mice receiving paclitaxel and 3) C57BL/6 male mice receiving cisplatin. This overview may help scientists selecting suitable CIPN models for their research. We hypothesize that by using effective and robust animal models that mimic the clinical situation as much as possible, the translational value of preclinical study results with respect to the potential of identifying promising treatments for CIPN in the future, will prove. The methodology described in this paper, aimed at comparing animal models, is novel and can be used by scientist in other research fields as well.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221787 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Suvarna Gadgil Mehmet Ergün Sandra A van den Heuvel Selina E van der Wal Gert Jan Scheffer Carlijn R Hooijmans |
spellingShingle |
Suvarna Gadgil Mehmet Ergün Sandra A van den Heuvel Selina E van der Wal Gert Jan Scheffer Carlijn R Hooijmans A systematic summary and comparison of animal models for chemotherapy induced (peripheral) neuropathy (CIPN). PLoS ONE |
author_facet |
Suvarna Gadgil Mehmet Ergün Sandra A van den Heuvel Selina E van der Wal Gert Jan Scheffer Carlijn R Hooijmans |
author_sort |
Suvarna Gadgil |
title |
A systematic summary and comparison of animal models for chemotherapy induced (peripheral) neuropathy (CIPN). |
title_short |
A systematic summary and comparison of animal models for chemotherapy induced (peripheral) neuropathy (CIPN). |
title_full |
A systematic summary and comparison of animal models for chemotherapy induced (peripheral) neuropathy (CIPN). |
title_fullStr |
A systematic summary and comparison of animal models for chemotherapy induced (peripheral) neuropathy (CIPN). |
title_full_unstemmed |
A systematic summary and comparison of animal models for chemotherapy induced (peripheral) neuropathy (CIPN). |
title_sort |
systematic summary and comparison of animal models for chemotherapy induced (peripheral) neuropathy (cipn). |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
series |
PLoS ONE |
issn |
1932-6203 |
publishDate |
2019-01-01 |
description |
Despite the large amount of human and experimental studies no effective (prophylactic) treatment exists for chemotherapy induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN), a disabling side effect of many cancer treatments. One of the underlying reasons for this could be that often the preclinical animal models used are not the best representation of the clinical situation. We therefore present a systematic summary and comparison of all animal models currently described in literature for CIPN focusing on stimulus evoked pain-like behaviour and neurophysiological alterations in nerve function (650 included papers, and a comparison of 183 models), that resulted in a clear overview of the most effective and robust CIPN models using an administration route used in clinical practice. Using our three-step approach (step 1: efficacy; step; 2 robustness and step 3: mimicking the clinical situation) we show that all mice CIPN models treated with either paclitaxel or cisplatin using an administration route used in clinical practice seem suitable models. Three specific models using paclitaxel or cisplatin that stand out are 1) C57BL/6 female mice receiving paclitaxel and 2) CD1 male mice receiving paclitaxel and 3) C57BL/6 male mice receiving cisplatin. This overview may help scientists selecting suitable CIPN models for their research. We hypothesize that by using effective and robust animal models that mimic the clinical situation as much as possible, the translational value of preclinical study results with respect to the potential of identifying promising treatments for CIPN in the future, will prove. The methodology described in this paper, aimed at comparing animal models, is novel and can be used by scientist in other research fields as well. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221787 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT suvarnagadgil asystematicsummaryandcomparisonofanimalmodelsforchemotherapyinducedperipheralneuropathycipn AT mehmetergun asystematicsummaryandcomparisonofanimalmodelsforchemotherapyinducedperipheralneuropathycipn AT sandraavandenheuvel asystematicsummaryandcomparisonofanimalmodelsforchemotherapyinducedperipheralneuropathycipn AT selinaevanderwal asystematicsummaryandcomparisonofanimalmodelsforchemotherapyinducedperipheralneuropathycipn AT gertjanscheffer asystematicsummaryandcomparisonofanimalmodelsforchemotherapyinducedperipheralneuropathycipn AT carlijnrhooijmans asystematicsummaryandcomparisonofanimalmodelsforchemotherapyinducedperipheralneuropathycipn AT suvarnagadgil systematicsummaryandcomparisonofanimalmodelsforchemotherapyinducedperipheralneuropathycipn AT mehmetergun systematicsummaryandcomparisonofanimalmodelsforchemotherapyinducedperipheralneuropathycipn AT sandraavandenheuvel systematicsummaryandcomparisonofanimalmodelsforchemotherapyinducedperipheralneuropathycipn AT selinaevanderwal systematicsummaryandcomparisonofanimalmodelsforchemotherapyinducedperipheralneuropathycipn AT gertjanscheffer systematicsummaryandcomparisonofanimalmodelsforchemotherapyinducedperipheralneuropathycipn AT carlijnrhooijmans systematicsummaryandcomparisonofanimalmodelsforchemotherapyinducedperipheralneuropathycipn |
_version_ |
1714825473994784768 |