Benchmarking multi-rate codon models.

The single rate codon model of non-synonymous substitution is ubiquitous in phylogenetic modeling. Indeed, the use of a non-synonymous to synonymous substitution rate ratio parameter has facilitated the interpretation of selection pressure on genomes. Although the single rate model has achieved wide...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wayne Delport, Konrad Scheffler, Mike B Gravenor, Spencer V Muse, Sergei Kosakovsky Pond
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2010-07-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC2908124?pdf=render
id doaj-c69d6af27dce42fbb0ac9813aa18aaab
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c69d6af27dce42fbb0ac9813aa18aaab2020-11-25T01:55:54ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032010-07-0157e1158710.1371/journal.pone.0011587Benchmarking multi-rate codon models.Wayne DelportKonrad SchefflerMike B GravenorSpencer V MuseSergei Kosakovsky PondThe single rate codon model of non-synonymous substitution is ubiquitous in phylogenetic modeling. Indeed, the use of a non-synonymous to synonymous substitution rate ratio parameter has facilitated the interpretation of selection pressure on genomes. Although the single rate model has achieved wide acceptance, we argue that the assumption of a single rate of non-synonymous substitution is biologically unreasonable, given observed differences in substitution rates evident from empirical amino acid models. Some have attempted to incorporate amino acid substitution biases into models of codon evolution and have shown improved model performance versus the single rate model. Here, we show that the single rate model of non-synonymous substitution is easily outperformed by a model with multiple non-synonymous rate classes, yet in which amino acid substitution pairs are assigned randomly to these classes. We argue that, since the single rate model is so easy to improve upon, new codon models should not be validated entirely on the basis of improved model fit over this model. Rather, we should strive to both improve on the single rate model and to approximate the general time-reversible model of codon substitution, with as few parameters as possible, so as to reduce model over-fitting. We hint at how this can be achieved with a Genetic Algorithm approach in which rate classes are assigned on the basis of sequence information content.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC2908124?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Wayne Delport
Konrad Scheffler
Mike B Gravenor
Spencer V Muse
Sergei Kosakovsky Pond
spellingShingle Wayne Delport
Konrad Scheffler
Mike B Gravenor
Spencer V Muse
Sergei Kosakovsky Pond
Benchmarking multi-rate codon models.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Wayne Delport
Konrad Scheffler
Mike B Gravenor
Spencer V Muse
Sergei Kosakovsky Pond
author_sort Wayne Delport
title Benchmarking multi-rate codon models.
title_short Benchmarking multi-rate codon models.
title_full Benchmarking multi-rate codon models.
title_fullStr Benchmarking multi-rate codon models.
title_full_unstemmed Benchmarking multi-rate codon models.
title_sort benchmarking multi-rate codon models.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2010-07-01
description The single rate codon model of non-synonymous substitution is ubiquitous in phylogenetic modeling. Indeed, the use of a non-synonymous to synonymous substitution rate ratio parameter has facilitated the interpretation of selection pressure on genomes. Although the single rate model has achieved wide acceptance, we argue that the assumption of a single rate of non-synonymous substitution is biologically unreasonable, given observed differences in substitution rates evident from empirical amino acid models. Some have attempted to incorporate amino acid substitution biases into models of codon evolution and have shown improved model performance versus the single rate model. Here, we show that the single rate model of non-synonymous substitution is easily outperformed by a model with multiple non-synonymous rate classes, yet in which amino acid substitution pairs are assigned randomly to these classes. We argue that, since the single rate model is so easy to improve upon, new codon models should not be validated entirely on the basis of improved model fit over this model. Rather, we should strive to both improve on the single rate model and to approximate the general time-reversible model of codon substitution, with as few parameters as possible, so as to reduce model over-fitting. We hint at how this can be achieved with a Genetic Algorithm approach in which rate classes are assigned on the basis of sequence information content.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC2908124?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT waynedelport benchmarkingmultiratecodonmodels
AT konradscheffler benchmarkingmultiratecodonmodels
AT mikebgravenor benchmarkingmultiratecodonmodels
AT spencervmuse benchmarkingmultiratecodonmodels
AT sergeikosakovskypond benchmarkingmultiratecodonmodels
_version_ 1724982709115158528