Approaches to Teaching Early Reading: Whole Language or Phonic Approach?

Abstract: The impacts of the great debate on early reading instruc­tion, which was started in the late 1960 and early 1970s, remain until today. In our education system, curriculum change also brings about the change of teaching ideology. For teachers, the result sometimes is more threatening than...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Didi Sukyadi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Association for the Teaching of English as a Foreign Language in Indonesia (TEFLIN) 1998-01-01
Series:TEFLIN Journal
Online Access:http://journal.teflin.org/index.php/teflin/article/view/163
id doaj-c6506ce2a38e4287a20358551aacbe13
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c6506ce2a38e4287a20358551aacbe132021-01-02T04:40:10ZengAssociation for the Teaching of English as a Foreign Language in Indonesia (TEFLIN)TEFLIN Journal0215-773X1998-01-0191Approaches to Teaching Early Reading: Whole Language or Phonic Approach?Didi SukyadiAbstract: The impacts of the great debate on early reading instruc­tion, which was started in the late 1960 and early 1970s, remain until today. In our education system, curriculum change also brings about the change of teaching ideology. For teachers, the result sometimes is more threatening than encouraging because they cannot anticipate the quick and inevitable change. They become disempowered and deprived, and that innovation is often difficult to implement. This study aimed to explore the orientation of student teachers and expe­rienced teachers towards reading instruction, namely phonic, skills, and whole language approach. This involved 30 primary student teachers of an Institute of Education in London and 30 experienced teachers teaching at Year 1 and 2 London inner city primary schools. Each of the respondents was sent a questionnaire, and asked to answer an open ended question concerning the best approach of teaching reading. The results revealed that in general there was no difference in teaching reading orientation between student teachers and experienced teachers. Both of them tend to believe that there was no single best method. The competing approaches are seen as comple­mentary. Any approach chosen should take into account child devel­opment, the nature of reading and environmental support. The impli­cations of these findings for teacher empowerment are discussed. http://journal.teflin.org/index.php/teflin/article/view/163
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Didi Sukyadi
spellingShingle Didi Sukyadi
Approaches to Teaching Early Reading: Whole Language or Phonic Approach?
TEFLIN Journal
author_facet Didi Sukyadi
author_sort Didi Sukyadi
title Approaches to Teaching Early Reading: Whole Language or Phonic Approach?
title_short Approaches to Teaching Early Reading: Whole Language or Phonic Approach?
title_full Approaches to Teaching Early Reading: Whole Language or Phonic Approach?
title_fullStr Approaches to Teaching Early Reading: Whole Language or Phonic Approach?
title_full_unstemmed Approaches to Teaching Early Reading: Whole Language or Phonic Approach?
title_sort approaches to teaching early reading: whole language or phonic approach?
publisher Association for the Teaching of English as a Foreign Language in Indonesia (TEFLIN)
series TEFLIN Journal
issn 0215-773X
publishDate 1998-01-01
description Abstract: The impacts of the great debate on early reading instruc­tion, which was started in the late 1960 and early 1970s, remain until today. In our education system, curriculum change also brings about the change of teaching ideology. For teachers, the result sometimes is more threatening than encouraging because they cannot anticipate the quick and inevitable change. They become disempowered and deprived, and that innovation is often difficult to implement. This study aimed to explore the orientation of student teachers and expe­rienced teachers towards reading instruction, namely phonic, skills, and whole language approach. This involved 30 primary student teachers of an Institute of Education in London and 30 experienced teachers teaching at Year 1 and 2 London inner city primary schools. Each of the respondents was sent a questionnaire, and asked to answer an open ended question concerning the best approach of teaching reading. The results revealed that in general there was no difference in teaching reading orientation between student teachers and experienced teachers. Both of them tend to believe that there was no single best method. The competing approaches are seen as comple­mentary. Any approach chosen should take into account child devel­opment, the nature of reading and environmental support. The impli­cations of these findings for teacher empowerment are discussed.
url http://journal.teflin.org/index.php/teflin/article/view/163
work_keys_str_mv AT didisukyadi approachestoteachingearlyreadingwholelanguageorphonicapproach
_version_ 1724360322295267328