The validity of a performance based assessment for aspiring school leaders
This paper introduces the new Massachusetts Performance Assessment for Leaders (PAL) and uses critical policy analysis to re-examine the validity evidence (using the 2014 Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing and a theory of multicultural validity) for the use and interpretation of the...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Arizona State University
2018-12-01
|
Series: | Education Policy Analysis Archives |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/3924 |
id |
doaj-c449c6bb53e14252ad82fde54f6a3529 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-c449c6bb53e14252ad82fde54f6a35292020-11-25T03:15:48ZengArizona State UniversityEducation Policy Analysis Archives1068-23412018-12-0126010.14507/epaa.26.39241858The validity of a performance based assessment for aspiring school leadersJack Ellyson Leonard0University of Massachusetts BostonThis paper introduces the new Massachusetts Performance Assessment for Leaders (PAL) and uses critical policy analysis to re-examine the validity evidence (using the 2014 Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing and a theory of multicultural validity) for the use and interpretation of the PAL in regards to emerging school leadership. Data sources include two years of PAL test documentation plus candidate surveys and interviews with program directors. The author’s role as a test user, faculty instructor, and certified test scorer afforded access to student work, student communications, scorer network training, and state department of education communications and meetings. The paper challenges the content validity, raises questions in regards to evidence based on response processes, internal structure, relation to other variables, consequences, and multicultural validity particularly when the PAL is used as a stand-alone, high-stakes licensure test and offers suggestions to improve the test as a formative assessment.https://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/3924certificationcritical policy analysiseducational administrationhigh stakes testsperformance assessmentprincipalsvalidity |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Jack Ellyson Leonard |
spellingShingle |
Jack Ellyson Leonard The validity of a performance based assessment for aspiring school leaders Education Policy Analysis Archives certification critical policy analysis educational administration high stakes tests performance assessment principals validity |
author_facet |
Jack Ellyson Leonard |
author_sort |
Jack Ellyson Leonard |
title |
The validity of a performance based assessment for aspiring school leaders |
title_short |
The validity of a performance based assessment for aspiring school leaders |
title_full |
The validity of a performance based assessment for aspiring school leaders |
title_fullStr |
The validity of a performance based assessment for aspiring school leaders |
title_full_unstemmed |
The validity of a performance based assessment for aspiring school leaders |
title_sort |
validity of a performance based assessment for aspiring school leaders |
publisher |
Arizona State University |
series |
Education Policy Analysis Archives |
issn |
1068-2341 |
publishDate |
2018-12-01 |
description |
This paper introduces the new Massachusetts Performance Assessment for Leaders (PAL) and uses critical policy analysis to re-examine the validity evidence (using the 2014 Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing and a theory of multicultural validity) for the use and interpretation of the PAL in regards to emerging school leadership. Data sources include two years of PAL test documentation plus candidate surveys and interviews with program directors. The author’s role as a test user, faculty instructor, and certified test scorer afforded access to student work, student communications, scorer network training, and state department of education communications and meetings. The paper challenges the content validity, raises questions in regards to evidence based on response processes, internal structure, relation to other variables, consequences, and multicultural validity particularly when the PAL is used as a stand-alone, high-stakes licensure test and offers suggestions to improve the test as a formative assessment. |
topic |
certification critical policy analysis educational administration high stakes tests performance assessment principals validity |
url |
https://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/3924 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT jackellysonleonard thevalidityofaperformancebasedassessmentforaspiringschoolleaders AT jackellysonleonard validityofaperformancebasedassessmentforaspiringschoolleaders |
_version_ |
1724637382104317952 |