Improving performance in quantum mechanics with explicit incentives to correct mistakes

An earlier investigation found that the performance of advanced students in a quantum mechanics course did not automatically improve from midterm to final exam on identical problems even when they were provided the correct solutions and their own graded exams. Here, we describe a study, which extend...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Benjamin R. Brown, Andrew Mason, Chandralekha Singh
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: American Physical Society 2016-03-01
Series:Physical Review Physics Education Research
Online Access:http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.12.010121
id doaj-c294903a393441238407eef98d2ac830
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c294903a393441238407eef98d2ac8302020-11-24T22:42:47ZengAmerican Physical SocietyPhysical Review Physics Education Research2469-98962016-03-0112101012110.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.12.010121Improving performance in quantum mechanics with explicit incentives to correct mistakesBenjamin R. BrownAndrew MasonChandralekha SinghAn earlier investigation found that the performance of advanced students in a quantum mechanics course did not automatically improve from midterm to final exam on identical problems even when they were provided the correct solutions and their own graded exams. Here, we describe a study, which extended over four years, in which upper-level undergraduate students in a quantum physics course were given four identical problems in both the midterm exam and final exam. Approximately half of the students were given explicit incentives to correct their mistakes in the midterm exam. In particular, they could get back up to 50% of the points lost on each midterm exam problem. The solutions to the midterm exam problems were provided to all students in both groups but those who corrected their mistakes were provided the solution after they submitted their corrections to the instructor. The performance on the same problems on the final exam suggests that students who were given incentives to correct their mistakes significantly outperformed those who were not given an incentive. The incentive to correct the mistakes had greater impact on the final exam performance of students who had not performed well on the midterm exam.http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.12.010121
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Benjamin R. Brown
Andrew Mason
Chandralekha Singh
spellingShingle Benjamin R. Brown
Andrew Mason
Chandralekha Singh
Improving performance in quantum mechanics with explicit incentives to correct mistakes
Physical Review Physics Education Research
author_facet Benjamin R. Brown
Andrew Mason
Chandralekha Singh
author_sort Benjamin R. Brown
title Improving performance in quantum mechanics with explicit incentives to correct mistakes
title_short Improving performance in quantum mechanics with explicit incentives to correct mistakes
title_full Improving performance in quantum mechanics with explicit incentives to correct mistakes
title_fullStr Improving performance in quantum mechanics with explicit incentives to correct mistakes
title_full_unstemmed Improving performance in quantum mechanics with explicit incentives to correct mistakes
title_sort improving performance in quantum mechanics with explicit incentives to correct mistakes
publisher American Physical Society
series Physical Review Physics Education Research
issn 2469-9896
publishDate 2016-03-01
description An earlier investigation found that the performance of advanced students in a quantum mechanics course did not automatically improve from midterm to final exam on identical problems even when they were provided the correct solutions and their own graded exams. Here, we describe a study, which extended over four years, in which upper-level undergraduate students in a quantum physics course were given four identical problems in both the midterm exam and final exam. Approximately half of the students were given explicit incentives to correct their mistakes in the midterm exam. In particular, they could get back up to 50% of the points lost on each midterm exam problem. The solutions to the midterm exam problems were provided to all students in both groups but those who corrected their mistakes were provided the solution after they submitted their corrections to the instructor. The performance on the same problems on the final exam suggests that students who were given incentives to correct their mistakes significantly outperformed those who were not given an incentive. The incentive to correct the mistakes had greater impact on the final exam performance of students who had not performed well on the midterm exam.
url http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.12.010121
work_keys_str_mv AT benjaminrbrown improvingperformanceinquantummechanicswithexplicitincentivestocorrectmistakes
AT andrewmason improvingperformanceinquantummechanicswithexplicitincentivestocorrectmistakes
AT chandralekhasingh improvingperformanceinquantummechanicswithexplicitincentivestocorrectmistakes
_version_ 1716479462724337664