Low cadence interval training at moderate intensity does not improve cycling performance in highly trained veteran cyclists

Purpose: The aim of the present study was to investigate effects of low cadence training at moderate intensity on aerobic capacity, cycling performance, gross efficiency, freely chosen cadence and leg strength in veteran cyclists. <br/>Method: Twenty-two well trained veteran cyclists (age: 47...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Morten eKristoffersen, Hilde eGundersen, Stig eLeirdal, Vegard Vereide Iversen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-01-01
Series:Frontiers in Physiology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fphys.2014.00034/full
id doaj-c2400909467a4852aeac0aeedb2428cb
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c2400909467a4852aeac0aeedb2428cb2020-11-24T22:33:44ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Physiology1664-042X2014-01-01510.3389/fphys.2014.0003474394Low cadence interval training at moderate intensity does not improve cycling performance in highly trained veteran cyclistsMorten eKristoffersen0Hilde eGundersen1Stig eLeirdal2Vegard Vereide Iversen3Bergen Uniersity CollegeBergen Uniersity CollegeNesna University CollegeBergen Uniersity CollegePurpose: The aim of the present study was to investigate effects of low cadence training at moderate intensity on aerobic capacity, cycling performance, gross efficiency, freely chosen cadence and leg strength in veteran cyclists. <br/>Method: Twenty-two well trained veteran cyclists (age: 47 ±6 years, maximal oxygen consumption (VO2max): 57.9 ±3.7 ml. kg-1. min-1) were randomized into two groups, a low cadence training group and a freely chose cadence training group. Respiratory variables, power output, cadence and leg strength were tested before and after a 12 weeks training intervention period. The low cadence training group performed 12 weeks of moderate (73-82 % of maximal heart rate (HRmax)) interval training (5 x 6 min) with a cadence of 40 revolutions per minute (rpm) two times a week, in addition to their usual training. The freely chosen cadence group added 90 minutes of training at freely chosen cadence at moderate intensity. <br/>Results: No significant effects of the low cadence training on aerobic capacity, cycling performance, power output, cadence, gross efficiency or leg strength was found. The freely chosen cadence group significantly improved both VO2max (58.9±2.4 vs. 62.2±3.2 ml. kg-1. min-1), VO2 consumption at lactate threshold (49.4 ±3.8 vs. 51.8±3.5 ml. kg-1. min-1) and during the 30 min performance test (52.8±3.0 vs. 54.7±3.5 ml. kg-1. min-1), and power output at lactate threshold (284 ±47 vs. 294 ±48 W) and during the 30 min performance test (284±42 vs. 297±50 W). <br/>Conclusion: Twelve weeks of low cadence (40 rpm) interval training at moderate intensity (73-82 % of HRmax) twice a week does not improve aerobic capacity, cycling performance or leg strength in highly trained veteran cyclists. However, adding training at same intensity (% of HRmax) and duration (90 minutes weekly) at freely chosen cadence seems beneficial for performance and physiological adaptations.<br/>http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fphys.2014.00034/fullEfficiencyEnduranceInterval trainingLow-cadenceCycling Performance
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Morten eKristoffersen
Hilde eGundersen
Stig eLeirdal
Vegard Vereide Iversen
spellingShingle Morten eKristoffersen
Hilde eGundersen
Stig eLeirdal
Vegard Vereide Iversen
Low cadence interval training at moderate intensity does not improve cycling performance in highly trained veteran cyclists
Frontiers in Physiology
Efficiency
Endurance
Interval training
Low-cadence
Cycling Performance
author_facet Morten eKristoffersen
Hilde eGundersen
Stig eLeirdal
Vegard Vereide Iversen
author_sort Morten eKristoffersen
title Low cadence interval training at moderate intensity does not improve cycling performance in highly trained veteran cyclists
title_short Low cadence interval training at moderate intensity does not improve cycling performance in highly trained veteran cyclists
title_full Low cadence interval training at moderate intensity does not improve cycling performance in highly trained veteran cyclists
title_fullStr Low cadence interval training at moderate intensity does not improve cycling performance in highly trained veteran cyclists
title_full_unstemmed Low cadence interval training at moderate intensity does not improve cycling performance in highly trained veteran cyclists
title_sort low cadence interval training at moderate intensity does not improve cycling performance in highly trained veteran cyclists
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Physiology
issn 1664-042X
publishDate 2014-01-01
description Purpose: The aim of the present study was to investigate effects of low cadence training at moderate intensity on aerobic capacity, cycling performance, gross efficiency, freely chosen cadence and leg strength in veteran cyclists. <br/>Method: Twenty-two well trained veteran cyclists (age: 47 ±6 years, maximal oxygen consumption (VO2max): 57.9 ±3.7 ml. kg-1. min-1) were randomized into two groups, a low cadence training group and a freely chose cadence training group. Respiratory variables, power output, cadence and leg strength were tested before and after a 12 weeks training intervention period. The low cadence training group performed 12 weeks of moderate (73-82 % of maximal heart rate (HRmax)) interval training (5 x 6 min) with a cadence of 40 revolutions per minute (rpm) two times a week, in addition to their usual training. The freely chosen cadence group added 90 minutes of training at freely chosen cadence at moderate intensity. <br/>Results: No significant effects of the low cadence training on aerobic capacity, cycling performance, power output, cadence, gross efficiency or leg strength was found. The freely chosen cadence group significantly improved both VO2max (58.9±2.4 vs. 62.2±3.2 ml. kg-1. min-1), VO2 consumption at lactate threshold (49.4 ±3.8 vs. 51.8±3.5 ml. kg-1. min-1) and during the 30 min performance test (52.8±3.0 vs. 54.7±3.5 ml. kg-1. min-1), and power output at lactate threshold (284 ±47 vs. 294 ±48 W) and during the 30 min performance test (284±42 vs. 297±50 W). <br/>Conclusion: Twelve weeks of low cadence (40 rpm) interval training at moderate intensity (73-82 % of HRmax) twice a week does not improve aerobic capacity, cycling performance or leg strength in highly trained veteran cyclists. However, adding training at same intensity (% of HRmax) and duration (90 minutes weekly) at freely chosen cadence seems beneficial for performance and physiological adaptations.<br/>
topic Efficiency
Endurance
Interval training
Low-cadence
Cycling Performance
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fphys.2014.00034/full
work_keys_str_mv AT mortenekristoffersen lowcadenceintervaltrainingatmoderateintensitydoesnotimprovecyclingperformanceinhighlytrainedveterancyclists
AT hildeegundersen lowcadenceintervaltrainingatmoderateintensitydoesnotimprovecyclingperformanceinhighlytrainedveterancyclists
AT stigeleirdal lowcadenceintervaltrainingatmoderateintensitydoesnotimprovecyclingperformanceinhighlytrainedveterancyclists
AT vegardvereideiversen lowcadenceintervaltrainingatmoderateintensitydoesnotimprovecyclingperformanceinhighlytrainedveterancyclists
_version_ 1725729524378763264