Effectiveness of online learning on health researcher capacity to appropriately integrate sex, gender, or both in grant proposals

Abstract Background To describe the effectiveness of online learning to augment academic capacity to consider sex and gender in the conduct of basic science, clinical research, and population health studies. Method The analysis compares pre- and post-test scores from 1441 individuals who completed t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cara Tannenbaum, Krystle van Hoof
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2018-08-01
Series:Biology of Sex Differences
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13293-018-0197-3
id doaj-bfdb1fbf16a945439d036789d6ef2e51
record_format Article
spelling doaj-bfdb1fbf16a945439d036789d6ef2e512020-11-25T00:49:03ZengBMCBiology of Sex Differences2042-64102018-08-01911810.1186/s13293-018-0197-3Effectiveness of online learning on health researcher capacity to appropriately integrate sex, gender, or both in grant proposalsCara Tannenbaum0Krystle van Hoof1Institute of Gender and Health, Canadian Institutes of Health ResearchInstitute of Gender and Health, Canadian Institutes of Health ResearchAbstract Background To describe the effectiveness of online learning to augment academic capacity to consider sex and gender in the conduct of basic science, clinical research, and population health studies. Method The analysis compares pre- and post-test scores from 1441 individuals who completed the Canadian Institutes of Health Research Institute of Gender and Health’s interactive e-learning modules between February 2016 and May 2017. The tests measured knowledge, self-efficacy, and self-reported intent to change behavior for three competencies: (1) the ability to appropriately define and distinguish between sex-related versus gender-related variables, (2) the application of methods for integrating sex and gender, and (3) the critical appraisal of sex and gender integration in the design, methods, and analysis plan of research proposals and publications. Results Of the 543 individuals who completed the basic science module, 62% demonstrated improved knowledge, and 86% increased self-efficacy across all competencies. Gains in knowledge and self-efficacy also occurred among 84% and 77% of completers of the human data collection module (n = 463) and among 73% and 82% of those who completed the secondary data analysis module (n = 435). In aggregate, 95% of participants reported an intent to change their behavior with respect to sex and gender in health research. Conclusions Interactive online learning combined with feedback and self-assessment results in improved knowledge and self-efficacy for integrating sex and gender in health research.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13293-018-0197-3
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Cara Tannenbaum
Krystle van Hoof
spellingShingle Cara Tannenbaum
Krystle van Hoof
Effectiveness of online learning on health researcher capacity to appropriately integrate sex, gender, or both in grant proposals
Biology of Sex Differences
author_facet Cara Tannenbaum
Krystle van Hoof
author_sort Cara Tannenbaum
title Effectiveness of online learning on health researcher capacity to appropriately integrate sex, gender, or both in grant proposals
title_short Effectiveness of online learning on health researcher capacity to appropriately integrate sex, gender, or both in grant proposals
title_full Effectiveness of online learning on health researcher capacity to appropriately integrate sex, gender, or both in grant proposals
title_fullStr Effectiveness of online learning on health researcher capacity to appropriately integrate sex, gender, or both in grant proposals
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of online learning on health researcher capacity to appropriately integrate sex, gender, or both in grant proposals
title_sort effectiveness of online learning on health researcher capacity to appropriately integrate sex, gender, or both in grant proposals
publisher BMC
series Biology of Sex Differences
issn 2042-6410
publishDate 2018-08-01
description Abstract Background To describe the effectiveness of online learning to augment academic capacity to consider sex and gender in the conduct of basic science, clinical research, and population health studies. Method The analysis compares pre- and post-test scores from 1441 individuals who completed the Canadian Institutes of Health Research Institute of Gender and Health’s interactive e-learning modules between February 2016 and May 2017. The tests measured knowledge, self-efficacy, and self-reported intent to change behavior for three competencies: (1) the ability to appropriately define and distinguish between sex-related versus gender-related variables, (2) the application of methods for integrating sex and gender, and (3) the critical appraisal of sex and gender integration in the design, methods, and analysis plan of research proposals and publications. Results Of the 543 individuals who completed the basic science module, 62% demonstrated improved knowledge, and 86% increased self-efficacy across all competencies. Gains in knowledge and self-efficacy also occurred among 84% and 77% of completers of the human data collection module (n = 463) and among 73% and 82% of those who completed the secondary data analysis module (n = 435). In aggregate, 95% of participants reported an intent to change their behavior with respect to sex and gender in health research. Conclusions Interactive online learning combined with feedback and self-assessment results in improved knowledge and self-efficacy for integrating sex and gender in health research.
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13293-018-0197-3
work_keys_str_mv AT caratannenbaum effectivenessofonlinelearningonhealthresearchercapacitytoappropriatelyintegratesexgenderorbothingrantproposals
AT krystlevanhoof effectivenessofonlinelearningonhealthresearchercapacitytoappropriatelyintegratesexgenderorbothingrantproposals
_version_ 1725253310419566592