The effects of the European e-cigarette health warnings and comparative health messages on non-smokers’ and smokers’ risk perceptions and behavioural intentions

Abstract Background Article 20 of the EU Tobacco Products Directive [TPD] stipulates that e-cigarette packets and refill products must carry a nicotine addiction health warning. Although previous studies conducted in North America have found that perceived harm, addictiveness and intention to use de...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Catherine Kimber, Daniel Frings, Sharon Cox, Ian Albery, Lynne Dawkins
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2018-11-01
Series:BMC Public Health
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12889-018-6161-7
id doaj-bf5588ad86d14d0ca77ef15bd50ca44d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-bf5588ad86d14d0ca77ef15bd50ca44d2020-11-25T01:34:06ZengBMCBMC Public Health1471-24582018-11-011811910.1186/s12889-018-6161-7The effects of the European e-cigarette health warnings and comparative health messages on non-smokers’ and smokers’ risk perceptions and behavioural intentionsCatherine Kimber0Daniel Frings1Sharon Cox2Ian Albery3Lynne Dawkins4Centre for Addictive Behaviours Research, Division of Psychology, School of Applied Sciences, 103 Borough road, London South Bank UniversityCentre for Addictive Behaviours Research, Division of Psychology, School of Applied Sciences, 103 Borough road, London South Bank UniversityCentre for Addictive Behaviours Research, Division of Psychology, School of Applied Sciences, 103 Borough road, London South Bank UniversityCentre for Addictive Behaviours Research, Division of Psychology, School of Applied Sciences, 103 Borough road, London South Bank UniversityCentre for Addictive Behaviours Research, Division of Psychology, School of Applied Sciences, 103 Borough road, London South Bank UniversityAbstract Background Article 20 of the EU Tobacco Products Directive [TPD] stipulates that e-cigarette packets and refill products must carry a nicotine addiction health warning. Although previous studies conducted in North America have found that perceived harm, addictiveness and intention to use declined following exposure to e-cigarette health warnings, possible effects of the TPD health warnings on smokers and non-smokers has not been studied. This study will investigate the effects of the EU TPD e-cigarette health warnings and a comparative harm message (COMP; developed specifically for this study) on smokers’ and non-smokers’ perceptions of harm, addictiveness and social acceptability of e-cigarettes. Additionally, the potential effects of the TPD warnings and the COMP on smokers’ intentions to purchase and use e-cigarettes will be explored. Methods/design A sample of 2400 UK residents will be recruited in this experimental, randomised design, with Smoking status (Smoker vs. Non-smoker), TPD presence (TPD1 vs. TPD2 vs. No-TPD) and COMP presence (Presence vs. Absence) as between subjects independent variables, and Time (pre-post exposure of images) as a within subjects factor. Dependent variables comprise self-reported perceived harm, addictiveness, social acceptability, e-cigarettes’ effectiveness, intentions to purchase and use e-cigarettes. Cigarette dependence, previous e-cigarette exposure, and baseline intentions to quit will be measured as covariates. Discussion Health warnings, such as those implemented by the TPD, may help to prevent non-smokers from e-cigarettes use, but it is possible that they may inadvertently deter smokers from initiating use and substituting their tobacco smoking for e-cigarettes use if their content is deemed too negative. It is hoped that this study will help identify the most effective message or combination of messages that encourage use among smokers without promoting use among non-smokers. Trial registration ISRCTN registry ISRCTN76967031; date of registration: 23/10/18.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12889-018-6161-7Electronic cigarettesE-cigarettesWarning labelsTobacco products directiveHealth messagesRisk perceptions
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Catherine Kimber
Daniel Frings
Sharon Cox
Ian Albery
Lynne Dawkins
spellingShingle Catherine Kimber
Daniel Frings
Sharon Cox
Ian Albery
Lynne Dawkins
The effects of the European e-cigarette health warnings and comparative health messages on non-smokers’ and smokers’ risk perceptions and behavioural intentions
BMC Public Health
Electronic cigarettes
E-cigarettes
Warning labels
Tobacco products directive
Health messages
Risk perceptions
author_facet Catherine Kimber
Daniel Frings
Sharon Cox
Ian Albery
Lynne Dawkins
author_sort Catherine Kimber
title The effects of the European e-cigarette health warnings and comparative health messages on non-smokers’ and smokers’ risk perceptions and behavioural intentions
title_short The effects of the European e-cigarette health warnings and comparative health messages on non-smokers’ and smokers’ risk perceptions and behavioural intentions
title_full The effects of the European e-cigarette health warnings and comparative health messages on non-smokers’ and smokers’ risk perceptions and behavioural intentions
title_fullStr The effects of the European e-cigarette health warnings and comparative health messages on non-smokers’ and smokers’ risk perceptions and behavioural intentions
title_full_unstemmed The effects of the European e-cigarette health warnings and comparative health messages on non-smokers’ and smokers’ risk perceptions and behavioural intentions
title_sort effects of the european e-cigarette health warnings and comparative health messages on non-smokers’ and smokers’ risk perceptions and behavioural intentions
publisher BMC
series BMC Public Health
issn 1471-2458
publishDate 2018-11-01
description Abstract Background Article 20 of the EU Tobacco Products Directive [TPD] stipulates that e-cigarette packets and refill products must carry a nicotine addiction health warning. Although previous studies conducted in North America have found that perceived harm, addictiveness and intention to use declined following exposure to e-cigarette health warnings, possible effects of the TPD health warnings on smokers and non-smokers has not been studied. This study will investigate the effects of the EU TPD e-cigarette health warnings and a comparative harm message (COMP; developed specifically for this study) on smokers’ and non-smokers’ perceptions of harm, addictiveness and social acceptability of e-cigarettes. Additionally, the potential effects of the TPD warnings and the COMP on smokers’ intentions to purchase and use e-cigarettes will be explored. Methods/design A sample of 2400 UK residents will be recruited in this experimental, randomised design, with Smoking status (Smoker vs. Non-smoker), TPD presence (TPD1 vs. TPD2 vs. No-TPD) and COMP presence (Presence vs. Absence) as between subjects independent variables, and Time (pre-post exposure of images) as a within subjects factor. Dependent variables comprise self-reported perceived harm, addictiveness, social acceptability, e-cigarettes’ effectiveness, intentions to purchase and use e-cigarettes. Cigarette dependence, previous e-cigarette exposure, and baseline intentions to quit will be measured as covariates. Discussion Health warnings, such as those implemented by the TPD, may help to prevent non-smokers from e-cigarettes use, but it is possible that they may inadvertently deter smokers from initiating use and substituting their tobacco smoking for e-cigarettes use if their content is deemed too negative. It is hoped that this study will help identify the most effective message or combination of messages that encourage use among smokers without promoting use among non-smokers. Trial registration ISRCTN registry ISRCTN76967031; date of registration: 23/10/18.
topic Electronic cigarettes
E-cigarettes
Warning labels
Tobacco products directive
Health messages
Risk perceptions
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12889-018-6161-7
work_keys_str_mv AT catherinekimber theeffectsoftheeuropeanecigarettehealthwarningsandcomparativehealthmessagesonnonsmokersandsmokersriskperceptionsandbehaviouralintentions
AT danielfrings theeffectsoftheeuropeanecigarettehealthwarningsandcomparativehealthmessagesonnonsmokersandsmokersriskperceptionsandbehaviouralintentions
AT sharoncox theeffectsoftheeuropeanecigarettehealthwarningsandcomparativehealthmessagesonnonsmokersandsmokersriskperceptionsandbehaviouralintentions
AT ianalbery theeffectsoftheeuropeanecigarettehealthwarningsandcomparativehealthmessagesonnonsmokersandsmokersriskperceptionsandbehaviouralintentions
AT lynnedawkins theeffectsoftheeuropeanecigarettehealthwarningsandcomparativehealthmessagesonnonsmokersandsmokersriskperceptionsandbehaviouralintentions
AT catherinekimber effectsoftheeuropeanecigarettehealthwarningsandcomparativehealthmessagesonnonsmokersandsmokersriskperceptionsandbehaviouralintentions
AT danielfrings effectsoftheeuropeanecigarettehealthwarningsandcomparativehealthmessagesonnonsmokersandsmokersriskperceptionsandbehaviouralintentions
AT sharoncox effectsoftheeuropeanecigarettehealthwarningsandcomparativehealthmessagesonnonsmokersandsmokersriskperceptionsandbehaviouralintentions
AT ianalbery effectsoftheeuropeanecigarettehealthwarningsandcomparativehealthmessagesonnonsmokersandsmokersriskperceptionsandbehaviouralintentions
AT lynnedawkins effectsoftheeuropeanecigarettehealthwarningsandcomparativehealthmessagesonnonsmokersandsmokersriskperceptionsandbehaviouralintentions
_version_ 1725073708272320512