Comparing results of an exact versus an approximate (Bayesian) measurement invariance test: A cross-country illustration with a scale to measure 19 human values

Comparing results of an exact versus an approximate (Bayesian) measurement invariance test: A cross-country illustration with a scale to measure 19 human values

One of the most frequently used procedures for measurement invariance testing is the multigroup confirmatory factor analysis (MGCFA). Muthén and Asparouhov recently proposed a new approach to test for approximate rather than exact measurement invariance using Bayesian MGCFA. Approximate measurement...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jan eCieciuch, Eldad eDavidov, Peter eSchmidt, Rene eAlgesheimer, Shalom H. Schwartz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-09-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Bayesian Analysis
multigroup confirmatory factor analysis
exact measurement invariance
approximate measurement invariance
configural metric scalar measurement invariance
Revised Portrait Values Questionnaire
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00982/full

Internet

http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00982/full

Similar Items