Working Memory Training does not Improve Intelligence: Evidence from Brazilian Children

Recent investigations applying working memory training have indicated that it is possible to train intelligence. This work aimed to verify the effectiveness of a cognitive training program aimed at increasing children's intelligence. Fifty-three Brazilian children, enrolled in the sixth year of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marcela Mansur-Alves, Carmen Flores-Mendoza
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2015-09-01
Series:Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-79722015000300474&lng=en&tlng=en
id doaj-b407d8ade5964db392609df782f9fe27
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b407d8ade5964db392609df782f9fe272020-11-24T20:54:28ZengSpringerOpenPsicologia: Reflexão e Crítica1678-71532015-09-0128347448210.1590/1678-7153.201528306S0102-79722015000300474Working Memory Training does not Improve Intelligence: Evidence from Brazilian ChildrenMarcela Mansur-AlvesCarmen Flores-MendozaRecent investigations applying working memory training have indicated that it is possible to train intelligence. This work aimed to verify the effectiveness of a cognitive training program aimed at increasing children's intelligence. Fifty-three Brazilian children, enrolled in the sixth year of elementary school (M=11.17 years, SD=.37), were selected from a larger original group. This selected sample was randomly assigned into the experimental group/EG (n=27) and the control group/CG (n=26). All children were evaluated by cognitive measures in the pre-test and post-test phase. Three working memory tasks encompassed the cognitive training program. The cognitive training was administered to the EG twice a week for eight weeks. The post-test assessment was administered two weeks following the conclusion of the training program. The statistical analysis indicated no significant differences between EG and CG after training for cognitive measurements. These results demonstrate partial support of the selective literature that indicates the difficulty of achieving significant intellectual changes through specific intervention programs.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-79722015000300474&lng=en&tlng=enTreinamentointeligênciamemória de trabalhocrianças brasileiras
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Marcela Mansur-Alves
Carmen Flores-Mendoza
spellingShingle Marcela Mansur-Alves
Carmen Flores-Mendoza
Working Memory Training does not Improve Intelligence: Evidence from Brazilian Children
Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica
Treinamento
inteligência
memória de trabalho
crianças brasileiras
author_facet Marcela Mansur-Alves
Carmen Flores-Mendoza
author_sort Marcela Mansur-Alves
title Working Memory Training does not Improve Intelligence: Evidence from Brazilian Children
title_short Working Memory Training does not Improve Intelligence: Evidence from Brazilian Children
title_full Working Memory Training does not Improve Intelligence: Evidence from Brazilian Children
title_fullStr Working Memory Training does not Improve Intelligence: Evidence from Brazilian Children
title_full_unstemmed Working Memory Training does not Improve Intelligence: Evidence from Brazilian Children
title_sort working memory training does not improve intelligence: evidence from brazilian children
publisher SpringerOpen
series Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica
issn 1678-7153
publishDate 2015-09-01
description Recent investigations applying working memory training have indicated that it is possible to train intelligence. This work aimed to verify the effectiveness of a cognitive training program aimed at increasing children's intelligence. Fifty-three Brazilian children, enrolled in the sixth year of elementary school (M=11.17 years, SD=.37), were selected from a larger original group. This selected sample was randomly assigned into the experimental group/EG (n=27) and the control group/CG (n=26). All children were evaluated by cognitive measures in the pre-test and post-test phase. Three working memory tasks encompassed the cognitive training program. The cognitive training was administered to the EG twice a week for eight weeks. The post-test assessment was administered two weeks following the conclusion of the training program. The statistical analysis indicated no significant differences between EG and CG after training for cognitive measurements. These results demonstrate partial support of the selective literature that indicates the difficulty of achieving significant intellectual changes through specific intervention programs.
topic Treinamento
inteligência
memória de trabalho
crianças brasileiras
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-79722015000300474&lng=en&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT marcelamansuralves workingmemorytrainingdoesnotimproveintelligenceevidencefrombrazilianchildren
AT carmenfloresmendoza workingmemorytrainingdoesnotimproveintelligenceevidencefrombrazilianchildren
_version_ 1716794433976926208