Cultivating credibility with probability words and numbers
Recent research suggests that communicating probabilities numerically rather than verbally benefits forecasters’ credibility. In two experiments, we tested the reproducibility of this communication-format effect. The effect was replicated under comparable conditions (low-probability, inaccurate fore...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Society for Judgment and Decision Making
2019-11-01
|
Series: | Judgment and Decision Making |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journal.sjdm.org/19/190912/jdm190912.pdf |
id |
doaj-b01a3150e2334fce89933b5aa67a6c54 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-b01a3150e2334fce89933b5aa67a6c542021-05-02T16:19:59ZengSociety for Judgment and Decision MakingJudgment and Decision Making1930-29752019-11-01146683695Cultivating credibility with probability words and numbersRobert N. CollinsDavid R. MandelRecent research suggests that communicating probabilities numerically rather than verbally benefits forecasters’ credibility. In two experiments, we tested the reproducibility of this communication-format effect. The effect was replicated under comparable conditions (low-probability, inaccurate forecasts), but it was reversed for low-probability accurate forecasts and eliminated for high-probability forecasts. Experiment 2 further showed that verbal probabilities convey implicit recommendations more clearly than probability information, whereas numeric probabilities do the opposite. Descriptively, the findings indicate that the effect of probability words versus numbers on credibility depends on how these formats convey directionality differently, how directionality implies recommendations even when none are explicitly given, and how such recommendations correspond with outcomes. Prescriptively, we propose that experts distinguish forecasts from advice, using numeric probabilities for the former and well-reasoned arguments for the latter.http://journal.sjdm.org/19/190912/jdm190912.pdfcredibility numeric probability verbal probability directionality forecasts accuracynakeywords |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Robert N. Collins David R. Mandel |
spellingShingle |
Robert N. Collins David R. Mandel Cultivating credibility with probability words and numbers Judgment and Decision Making credibility numeric probability verbal probability directionality forecasts accuracynakeywords |
author_facet |
Robert N. Collins David R. Mandel |
author_sort |
Robert N. Collins |
title |
Cultivating
credibility with probability words and numbers |
title_short |
Cultivating
credibility with probability words and numbers |
title_full |
Cultivating
credibility with probability words and numbers |
title_fullStr |
Cultivating
credibility with probability words and numbers |
title_full_unstemmed |
Cultivating
credibility with probability words and numbers |
title_sort |
cultivating
credibility with probability words and numbers |
publisher |
Society for Judgment and Decision Making |
series |
Judgment and Decision Making |
issn |
1930-2975 |
publishDate |
2019-11-01 |
description |
Recent research
suggests that communicating probabilities numerically rather than verbally
benefits forecasters’ credibility. In two experiments, we tested the
reproducibility of this communication-format effect. The effect was replicated
under comparable conditions (low-probability, inaccurate forecasts), but it was
reversed for low-probability accurate forecasts and eliminated for
high-probability forecasts. Experiment 2 further showed that verbal
probabilities convey implicit recommendations more clearly than probability
information, whereas numeric probabilities do the opposite. Descriptively, the
findings indicate that the effect of probability words versus numbers on
credibility depends on how these formats convey directionality differently, how
directionality implies recommendations even when none are explicitly given, and
how such recommendations correspond with outcomes. Prescriptively, we propose
that experts distinguish forecasts from advice, using numeric probabilities for
the former and well-reasoned arguments for the latter. |
topic |
credibility numeric probability verbal probability directionality forecasts accuracynakeywords |
url |
http://journal.sjdm.org/19/190912/jdm190912.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT robertncollins cultivatingcredibilitywithprobabilitywordsandnumbers AT davidrmandel cultivatingcredibilitywithprobabilitywordsandnumbers |
_version_ |
1721490103435526144 |