Epistemic Capabilities and Epistemic Injustice: What is the Role of Higher Education in Fostering Epistemic Contributions of Marginalized Knowledge Producers?

This paper explores how University as social entity has great potential to confront epistemic injustices by expanding epistemic capabilities. To do this, we primarily follow the contributions of scholars such as Miranda Fricker and José Medina. The epistemic capabilities and epistemic injustice nex...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alejandra Boni, Diana Velasco
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Global Justice Network 2020-03-01
Series:Global justice: Theory, Practice, Rhetoric
Online Access:https://www.theglobaljusticenetwork.org/index.php/gjn/article/view/228
id doaj-ade89658b05d47e9bf85491ea9df8f3a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ade89658b05d47e9bf85491ea9df8f3a2021-07-29T07:24:55ZengGlobal Justice NetworkGlobal justice: Theory, Practice, Rhetoric1835-68422020-03-01120110.21248/gjn.12.01.228228Epistemic Capabilities and Epistemic Injustice: What is the Role of Higher Education in Fostering Epistemic Contributions of Marginalized Knowledge Producers?Alejandra BoniDiana Velasco This paper explores how University as social entity has great potential to confront epistemic injustices by expanding epistemic capabilities. To do this, we primarily follow the contributions of scholars such as Miranda Fricker and José Medina. The epistemic capabilities and epistemic injustice nexus will be explored via two empirical cases: the first one is an experience developed in Lagos (Nigeria) using participatory video; the second is a service learning pedagogical strategy for final year undergraduate students conducted at Universidad de Ibagué (in Colombia). The Lagos experience shows how participatory action-research methodologies could promote epistemic capabilities and functioning, making it possible for the participants to generate interpretive materials to speak of their own realities. However, this experience is too limited to address testimonial and hermeneutical injustice. The Colombian experience is a remarkable experience that is building epistemic capabilities among students and other local participants. However, there is a hermeneutical and structural injustice that tends to give more value to disciplinary and codified knowledge at the expense of experiential and tacit knowledge. https://www.theglobaljusticenetwork.org/index.php/gjn/article/view/228
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Alejandra Boni
Diana Velasco
spellingShingle Alejandra Boni
Diana Velasco
Epistemic Capabilities and Epistemic Injustice: What is the Role of Higher Education in Fostering Epistemic Contributions of Marginalized Knowledge Producers?
Global justice: Theory, Practice, Rhetoric
author_facet Alejandra Boni
Diana Velasco
author_sort Alejandra Boni
title Epistemic Capabilities and Epistemic Injustice: What is the Role of Higher Education in Fostering Epistemic Contributions of Marginalized Knowledge Producers?
title_short Epistemic Capabilities and Epistemic Injustice: What is the Role of Higher Education in Fostering Epistemic Contributions of Marginalized Knowledge Producers?
title_full Epistemic Capabilities and Epistemic Injustice: What is the Role of Higher Education in Fostering Epistemic Contributions of Marginalized Knowledge Producers?
title_fullStr Epistemic Capabilities and Epistemic Injustice: What is the Role of Higher Education in Fostering Epistemic Contributions of Marginalized Knowledge Producers?
title_full_unstemmed Epistemic Capabilities and Epistemic Injustice: What is the Role of Higher Education in Fostering Epistemic Contributions of Marginalized Knowledge Producers?
title_sort epistemic capabilities and epistemic injustice: what is the role of higher education in fostering epistemic contributions of marginalized knowledge producers?
publisher Global Justice Network
series Global justice: Theory, Practice, Rhetoric
issn 1835-6842
publishDate 2020-03-01
description This paper explores how University as social entity has great potential to confront epistemic injustices by expanding epistemic capabilities. To do this, we primarily follow the contributions of scholars such as Miranda Fricker and José Medina. The epistemic capabilities and epistemic injustice nexus will be explored via two empirical cases: the first one is an experience developed in Lagos (Nigeria) using participatory video; the second is a service learning pedagogical strategy for final year undergraduate students conducted at Universidad de Ibagué (in Colombia). The Lagos experience shows how participatory action-research methodologies could promote epistemic capabilities and functioning, making it possible for the participants to generate interpretive materials to speak of their own realities. However, this experience is too limited to address testimonial and hermeneutical injustice. The Colombian experience is a remarkable experience that is building epistemic capabilities among students and other local participants. However, there is a hermeneutical and structural injustice that tends to give more value to disciplinary and codified knowledge at the expense of experiential and tacit knowledge.
url https://www.theglobaljusticenetwork.org/index.php/gjn/article/view/228
work_keys_str_mv AT alejandraboni epistemiccapabilitiesandepistemicinjusticewhatistheroleofhighereducationinfosteringepistemiccontributionsofmarginalizedknowledgeproducers
AT dianavelasco epistemiccapabilitiesandepistemicinjusticewhatistheroleofhighereducationinfosteringepistemiccontributionsofmarginalizedknowledgeproducers
_version_ 1721259296917815296