Examining the Factor Structure Underlying the TAP System for Teacher and Student Advancement

In this study, we investigated the factor structure underlying the TAP System for Teacher and Student Advancement using confirmatory and exploratory factor–analytic methods and under conditions of multilevel (nested) data structures and ordinal measurement scales. We found evidence of generally poor...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Edward Sloat, Audrey Amrein-Beardsley, Kent E. Sabo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2017-10-01
Series:AERA Open
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858417735526
id doaj-ab11c68f25ac406493685d1ca08ed2c8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ab11c68f25ac406493685d1ca08ed2c82020-11-25T03:24:07ZengSAGE PublishingAERA Open2332-85842017-10-01310.1177/2332858417735526Examining the Factor Structure Underlying the TAP System for Teacher and Student AdvancementEdward SloatAudrey Amrein-BeardsleyKent E. SaboIn this study, we investigated the factor structure underlying the TAP System for Teacher and Student Advancement using confirmatory and exploratory factor–analytic methods and under conditions of multilevel (nested) data structures and ordinal measurement scales. We found evidence of generally poor fit with the system’s posited first-order, three-factor structure with relatively large correlations among measured dimensions. Exploratory analysis suggests one to two interpretable factors, one of which accounts for the majority of explained variance (i.e., a general or common underlying factor). Higher-order modeling confirms the presence of a bifactor structure composed of a single general trait supported by one or two subscales. We use this evidence to question the validity of the inferences drawn from TAP subscale scores. We accordingly discuss implications for low- and high-stakes applications of TAP output, especially when consequential decisions are attached to subscale-level estimates (i.e., teacher compensation based on latent performance as rated through weighted subscales).https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858417735526
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Edward Sloat
Audrey Amrein-Beardsley
Kent E. Sabo
spellingShingle Edward Sloat
Audrey Amrein-Beardsley
Kent E. Sabo
Examining the Factor Structure Underlying the TAP System for Teacher and Student Advancement
AERA Open
author_facet Edward Sloat
Audrey Amrein-Beardsley
Kent E. Sabo
author_sort Edward Sloat
title Examining the Factor Structure Underlying the TAP System for Teacher and Student Advancement
title_short Examining the Factor Structure Underlying the TAP System for Teacher and Student Advancement
title_full Examining the Factor Structure Underlying the TAP System for Teacher and Student Advancement
title_fullStr Examining the Factor Structure Underlying the TAP System for Teacher and Student Advancement
title_full_unstemmed Examining the Factor Structure Underlying the TAP System for Teacher and Student Advancement
title_sort examining the factor structure underlying the tap system for teacher and student advancement
publisher SAGE Publishing
series AERA Open
issn 2332-8584
publishDate 2017-10-01
description In this study, we investigated the factor structure underlying the TAP System for Teacher and Student Advancement using confirmatory and exploratory factor–analytic methods and under conditions of multilevel (nested) data structures and ordinal measurement scales. We found evidence of generally poor fit with the system’s posited first-order, three-factor structure with relatively large correlations among measured dimensions. Exploratory analysis suggests one to two interpretable factors, one of which accounts for the majority of explained variance (i.e., a general or common underlying factor). Higher-order modeling confirms the presence of a bifactor structure composed of a single general trait supported by one or two subscales. We use this evidence to question the validity of the inferences drawn from TAP subscale scores. We accordingly discuss implications for low- and high-stakes applications of TAP output, especially when consequential decisions are attached to subscale-level estimates (i.e., teacher compensation based on latent performance as rated through weighted subscales).
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858417735526
work_keys_str_mv AT edwardsloat examiningthefactorstructureunderlyingthetapsystemforteacherandstudentadvancement
AT audreyamreinbeardsley examiningthefactorstructureunderlyingthetapsystemforteacherandstudentadvancement
AT kentesabo examiningthefactorstructureunderlyingthetapsystemforteacherandstudentadvancement
_version_ 1724603240722464768