The use of metadiscourse in academic writing by Malaysian first-year ESL doctoral students
Metadiscourse refers to linguistic items, which functions to establish a connection with imagined readers of a text (Hyland, 2004). The use of metadiscourse has received much attention in various contexts, yet, little works are focusing on disciplinary metadiscourse, that has been carried out. To ad...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
2020-06-01
|
Series: | Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/IJAL/article/view/25069 |
id |
doaj-ab04202cb0b24d6aa7ad1230ab23ffb0 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-ab04202cb0b24d6aa7ad1230ab23ffb02020-11-25T03:52:16ZengUniversitas Pendidikan IndonesiaIndonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics2301-94682502-67472020-06-0110127128210.17509/ijal.v10i1.2506912381The use of metadiscourse in academic writing by Malaysian first-year ESL doctoral studentsYueh Yea Lo0Juliana Othman1Jia Wei Lim2Department of Language and Literacy Education, Faculty of Education, University of Malaya, Jalan Universiti, 50603, Kuala LumpurDepartment of Language and Literacy Education, Faculty of Education, University of Malaya, Jalan Universiti, 50603, Kuala LumpurDepartment of Language and Literacy Education, Faculty of Education, University of Malaya, Jalan Universiti, 50603, Kuala LumpurMetadiscourse refers to linguistic items, which functions to establish a connection with imagined readers of a text (Hyland, 2004). The use of metadiscourse has received much attention in various contexts, yet, little works are focusing on disciplinary metadiscourse, that has been carried out. To address this gap, this study explored, described, and compared the use of disciplinary metadiscourse by eight Malaysian first-year ESL doctoral students across four areas of study in education. The study reported in this article focuses on development or changes in writing over time. This study is quantitative in nature with a corpus-based approach utilizing AntConc (3.4.4) to examine the frequency of three dimensions of academic discourse in their writing, namely textual, engagement, and evaluative The results of this analysis show that (i) the engagement dimension (3.1%) was the lowest of all three dimensions in written work, reinforcing the argument that first-year ESL doctoral students are less experienced at using textual metadiscourse resources, and (ii) frequency of all three dimensions of academic discourse in their writing differs across time between first written drafts to the final written drafts. These are first-year ESL doctoral students, who are writing in different fields of educational research. The implication is that teaching and learning of disciplinary metadiscourse should involve explicit explanation, demonstration, and practice of its use, and development in the academic writing process. Academic writing; corpus analysis; ESL doctoral students; metadiscoursehttps://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/IJAL/article/view/25069academic writingcorpus analysisesl doctoral studentsmetadiscourse |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Yueh Yea Lo Juliana Othman Jia Wei Lim |
spellingShingle |
Yueh Yea Lo Juliana Othman Jia Wei Lim The use of metadiscourse in academic writing by Malaysian first-year ESL doctoral students Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics academic writing corpus analysis esl doctoral students metadiscourse |
author_facet |
Yueh Yea Lo Juliana Othman Jia Wei Lim |
author_sort |
Yueh Yea Lo |
title |
The use of metadiscourse in academic writing by Malaysian first-year ESL doctoral students |
title_short |
The use of metadiscourse in academic writing by Malaysian first-year ESL doctoral students |
title_full |
The use of metadiscourse in academic writing by Malaysian first-year ESL doctoral students |
title_fullStr |
The use of metadiscourse in academic writing by Malaysian first-year ESL doctoral students |
title_full_unstemmed |
The use of metadiscourse in academic writing by Malaysian first-year ESL doctoral students |
title_sort |
use of metadiscourse in academic writing by malaysian first-year esl doctoral students |
publisher |
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia |
series |
Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics |
issn |
2301-9468 2502-6747 |
publishDate |
2020-06-01 |
description |
Metadiscourse refers to linguistic items, which functions to establish a connection with imagined readers of a text (Hyland, 2004). The use of metadiscourse has received much attention in various contexts, yet, little works are focusing on disciplinary metadiscourse, that has been carried out. To address this gap, this study explored, described, and compared the use of disciplinary metadiscourse by eight Malaysian first-year ESL doctoral students across four areas of study in education. The study reported in this article focuses on development or changes in writing over time. This study is quantitative in nature with a corpus-based approach utilizing AntConc (3.4.4) to examine the frequency of three dimensions of academic discourse in their writing, namely textual, engagement, and evaluative The results of this analysis show that (i) the engagement dimension (3.1%) was the lowest of all three dimensions in written work, reinforcing the argument that first-year ESL doctoral students are less experienced at using textual metadiscourse resources, and (ii) frequency of all three dimensions of academic discourse in their writing differs across time between first written drafts to the final written drafts. These are first-year ESL doctoral students, who are writing in different fields of educational research. The implication is that teaching and learning of disciplinary metadiscourse should involve explicit explanation, demonstration, and practice of its use, and development in the academic writing process.
Academic writing; corpus analysis; ESL doctoral students; metadiscourse |
topic |
academic writing corpus analysis esl doctoral students metadiscourse |
url |
https://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/IJAL/article/view/25069 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT yuehyealo theuseofmetadiscourseinacademicwritingbymalaysianfirstyearesldoctoralstudents AT julianaothman theuseofmetadiscourseinacademicwritingbymalaysianfirstyearesldoctoralstudents AT jiaweilim theuseofmetadiscourseinacademicwritingbymalaysianfirstyearesldoctoralstudents AT yuehyealo useofmetadiscourseinacademicwritingbymalaysianfirstyearesldoctoralstudents AT julianaothman useofmetadiscourseinacademicwritingbymalaysianfirstyearesldoctoralstudents AT jiaweilim useofmetadiscourseinacademicwritingbymalaysianfirstyearesldoctoralstudents |
_version_ |
1724483254019424256 |