The use of metadiscourse in academic writing by Malaysian first-year ESL doctoral students

Metadiscourse refers to linguistic items, which functions to establish a connection with imagined readers of a text (Hyland, 2004). The use of metadiscourse has received much attention in various contexts, yet, little works are focusing on disciplinary metadiscourse, that has been carried out. To ad...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yueh Yea Lo, Juliana Othman, Jia Wei Lim
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia 2020-06-01
Series:Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/IJAL/article/view/25069
id doaj-ab04202cb0b24d6aa7ad1230ab23ffb0
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ab04202cb0b24d6aa7ad1230ab23ffb02020-11-25T03:52:16ZengUniversitas Pendidikan IndonesiaIndonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics2301-94682502-67472020-06-0110127128210.17509/ijal.v10i1.2506912381The use of metadiscourse in academic writing by Malaysian first-year ESL doctoral studentsYueh Yea Lo0Juliana Othman1Jia Wei Lim2Department of Language and Literacy Education, Faculty of Education, University of Malaya, Jalan Universiti, 50603, Kuala LumpurDepartment of Language and Literacy Education, Faculty of Education, University of Malaya, Jalan Universiti, 50603, Kuala LumpurDepartment of Language and Literacy Education, Faculty of Education, University of Malaya, Jalan Universiti, 50603, Kuala LumpurMetadiscourse refers to linguistic items, which functions to establish a connection with imagined readers of a text (Hyland, 2004). The use of metadiscourse has received much attention in various contexts, yet, little works are focusing on disciplinary metadiscourse, that has been carried out. To address this gap, this study explored, described, and compared the use of disciplinary metadiscourse by eight Malaysian first-year ESL doctoral students across four areas of study in education. The study reported in this article focuses on development or changes in writing over time. This study is quantitative in nature with a corpus-based approach utilizing AntConc (3.4.4) to examine the frequency of three dimensions of academic discourse in their writing, namely textual, engagement, and evaluative The results of this analysis show that (i) the engagement dimension (3.1%) was the lowest of all three dimensions in written work, reinforcing the argument that first-year ESL doctoral students are less experienced at using textual metadiscourse resources, and (ii) frequency of all three dimensions of academic discourse in their writing differs across time between first written drafts to the final written drafts. These are first-year ESL doctoral students, who are writing in different fields of educational research. The implication is that teaching and learning of disciplinary metadiscourse should involve explicit explanation, demonstration, and practice of its use, and development in the academic writing process. Academic writing; corpus analysis; ESL doctoral students; metadiscoursehttps://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/IJAL/article/view/25069academic writingcorpus analysisesl doctoral studentsmetadiscourse
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Yueh Yea Lo
Juliana Othman
Jia Wei Lim
spellingShingle Yueh Yea Lo
Juliana Othman
Jia Wei Lim
The use of metadiscourse in academic writing by Malaysian first-year ESL doctoral students
Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics
academic writing
corpus analysis
esl doctoral students
metadiscourse
author_facet Yueh Yea Lo
Juliana Othman
Jia Wei Lim
author_sort Yueh Yea Lo
title The use of metadiscourse in academic writing by Malaysian first-year ESL doctoral students
title_short The use of metadiscourse in academic writing by Malaysian first-year ESL doctoral students
title_full The use of metadiscourse in academic writing by Malaysian first-year ESL doctoral students
title_fullStr The use of metadiscourse in academic writing by Malaysian first-year ESL doctoral students
title_full_unstemmed The use of metadiscourse in academic writing by Malaysian first-year ESL doctoral students
title_sort use of metadiscourse in academic writing by malaysian first-year esl doctoral students
publisher Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
series Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics
issn 2301-9468
2502-6747
publishDate 2020-06-01
description Metadiscourse refers to linguistic items, which functions to establish a connection with imagined readers of a text (Hyland, 2004). The use of metadiscourse has received much attention in various contexts, yet, little works are focusing on disciplinary metadiscourse, that has been carried out. To address this gap, this study explored, described, and compared the use of disciplinary metadiscourse by eight Malaysian first-year ESL doctoral students across four areas of study in education. The study reported in this article focuses on development or changes in writing over time. This study is quantitative in nature with a corpus-based approach utilizing AntConc (3.4.4) to examine the frequency of three dimensions of academic discourse in their writing, namely textual, engagement, and evaluative The results of this analysis show that (i) the engagement dimension (3.1%) was the lowest of all three dimensions in written work, reinforcing the argument that first-year ESL doctoral students are less experienced at using textual metadiscourse resources, and (ii) frequency of all three dimensions of academic discourse in their writing differs across time between first written drafts to the final written drafts. These are first-year ESL doctoral students, who are writing in different fields of educational research. The implication is that teaching and learning of disciplinary metadiscourse should involve explicit explanation, demonstration, and practice of its use, and development in the academic writing process. Academic writing; corpus analysis; ESL doctoral students; metadiscourse
topic academic writing
corpus analysis
esl doctoral students
metadiscourse
url https://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/IJAL/article/view/25069
work_keys_str_mv AT yuehyealo theuseofmetadiscourseinacademicwritingbymalaysianfirstyearesldoctoralstudents
AT julianaothman theuseofmetadiscourseinacademicwritingbymalaysianfirstyearesldoctoralstudents
AT jiaweilim theuseofmetadiscourseinacademicwritingbymalaysianfirstyearesldoctoralstudents
AT yuehyealo useofmetadiscourseinacademicwritingbymalaysianfirstyearesldoctoralstudents
AT julianaothman useofmetadiscourseinacademicwritingbymalaysianfirstyearesldoctoralstudents
AT jiaweilim useofmetadiscourseinacademicwritingbymalaysianfirstyearesldoctoralstudents
_version_ 1724483254019424256