A heuristic framework for voice instruction at the doctoral level
The notion of voice as an integral aspect of language use has been extensively theorised in linguistics. However, empirical research and pedagogical models have not yet matched the sophistication of voice theories in linguistics, and little attention has been paid to advanced academic writing. This...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Afrikaans |
Published: |
Stellenbosch University
2018-11-01
|
Series: | Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics Plus |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://spilplus.journals.ac.za/pub/article/view/768 |
id |
doaj-aa099a42d0f740afb61af224a1ba9093 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-aa099a42d0f740afb61af224a1ba90932020-11-25T03:35:34ZafrStellenbosch UniversityStellenbosch Papers in Linguistics Plus1726-541X2224-33802018-11-0155072610.5842/55-0-768A heuristic framework for voice instruction at the doctoral level Olivier, Alet0Carstens, Adelia 1Self-Employed, Academic Literacy Consultant, Bloemfontein, South AfricaUniversity of PretoriaThe notion of voice as an integral aspect of language use has been extensively theorised in linguistics. However, empirical research and pedagogical models have not yet matched the sophistication of voice theories in linguistics, and little attention has been paid to advanced academic writing. This article attempts to address two pertinent gaps in the pedagogical and empirical literature: inadequate training of doctoral students to make an authentic contribution to knowledge creation in their respective fields, of which a distinctive authorial voice is a criterial feature; and bridging the gap between theory-and practice. An account is given of two theoretical models of voice – both embedded in Systemic Functional Linguistics – that have served as the basis of the majority of instruments aimed at concretising the somewhat elusive notion of voice. An overview is given of existing heuristics of voice designed by other scholars, followed by the presentation and description of a self-developed and comprehensive heuristic framework for voice that may inform the development of instructional toolkits for doctoral students. http://spilplus.journals.ac.za/pub/article/view/768Academic writingdoctoral writingmetadiscoursepedagogy of voicestance and engagement |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
Afrikaans |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Olivier, Alet Carstens, Adelia |
spellingShingle |
Olivier, Alet Carstens, Adelia A heuristic framework for voice instruction at the doctoral level Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics Plus Academic writing doctoral writing metadiscourse pedagogy of voice stance and engagement |
author_facet |
Olivier, Alet Carstens, Adelia |
author_sort |
Olivier, Alet |
title |
A heuristic framework for voice instruction at the doctoral level |
title_short |
A heuristic framework for voice instruction at the doctoral level |
title_full |
A heuristic framework for voice instruction at the doctoral level |
title_fullStr |
A heuristic framework for voice instruction at the doctoral level |
title_full_unstemmed |
A heuristic framework for voice instruction at the doctoral level |
title_sort |
heuristic framework for voice instruction at the doctoral level |
publisher |
Stellenbosch University |
series |
Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics Plus |
issn |
1726-541X 2224-3380 |
publishDate |
2018-11-01 |
description |
The notion of voice as an integral aspect of language use has been extensively theorised in linguistics. However, empirical research and pedagogical models have not yet matched the sophistication of voice theories in linguistics, and little attention has been paid to advanced academic writing. This article attempts to address two pertinent gaps in the pedagogical and empirical literature: inadequate training of doctoral students to make an authentic contribution to knowledge creation in their respective fields, of which a distinctive authorial voice is a criterial feature; and bridging the gap between theory-and practice. An account is given of two theoretical models of voice – both embedded in Systemic Functional Linguistics – that have served as the basis of the majority of instruments aimed at concretising the somewhat elusive notion of voice. An overview is given of existing heuristics of voice designed by other scholars, followed by the presentation and description of a self-developed and comprehensive heuristic framework for voice that may inform the development of instructional toolkits for doctoral students. |
topic |
Academic writing doctoral writing metadiscourse pedagogy of voice stance and engagement |
url |
http://spilplus.journals.ac.za/pub/article/view/768 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT olivieralet aheuristicframeworkforvoiceinstructionatthedoctorallevel AT carstensadelia aheuristicframeworkforvoiceinstructionatthedoctorallevel AT olivieralet heuristicframeworkforvoiceinstructionatthedoctorallevel AT carstensadelia heuristicframeworkforvoiceinstructionatthedoctorallevel |
_version_ |
1724553648073080832 |