Teaching English as a Language not Subject by Employing Formative Assessment

English is a second language (L2) in Sindh, Pakistan. Most of the public sector schools in Sindh teach English as a subject rather than a language. Besides, they do not distinguish between generic pedagogy and distinctive approaches used for teaching English as a first language (L1) and second langu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Muhammad Tufail Chandio, Saima Jafferi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Institute of Business Management 2015-12-01
Series:Journal of Education and Educational Development
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.iobmresearch.com/index.php/JEED/article/view/444/98
id doaj-a831dad8ebcf4c82bd16e6ab76c88cd9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a831dad8ebcf4c82bd16e6ab76c88cd92020-11-25T03:37:08ZengInstitute of Business ManagementJournal of Education and Educational Development2310-08692313-35382015-12-0122151171http://dx.doi.org/10.22555/joeed.v2i2.444Teaching English as a Language not Subject by Employing Formative AssessmentMuhammad Tufail Chandio0Saima Jafferi 1University of Sindh, Laar Campus BadinUniversity of Sindh, JamshoroEnglish is a second language (L2) in Sindh, Pakistan. Most of the public sector schools in Sindh teach English as a subject rather than a language. Besides, they do not distinguish between generic pedagogy and distinctive approaches used for teaching English as a first language (L1) and second language (L2). In addition, the erroneous traditional assessment focuses on only writing and reading skills and the listening and speaking skills of L2 remain excluded. There is a great emphasis on summative assessments, which contribute to a qualification; however, formative assessments, which provide timely and continuous appraisal and feedback, remain ignored. Summative assessment employs only paper-and- pencil based test, while the other current means of alternative assessments like self-assessment, peer-assessment, and portfolio assessment have not been incorporated, and explored yet. Teaching English as a subject not as a language, employing summative assessment not formative, depending on paper-and-pencil based test, and not using the alternative modes of assessment are some of the questions this study will deal with. The study under discussion suggests that current approaches employed for teaching English are misplaced as these take a subject teaching approach rather than a language teaching approach. It also argues for the paradigm shift from a product to process approach to assessment by administering modern alternative assessments.http://journals.iobmresearch.com/index.php/JEED/article/view/444/98alternatives in assessmentEnglish as L2formative assessmentsummative assessment
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Muhammad Tufail Chandio
Saima Jafferi
spellingShingle Muhammad Tufail Chandio
Saima Jafferi
Teaching English as a Language not Subject by Employing Formative Assessment
Journal of Education and Educational Development
alternatives in assessment
English as L2
formative assessment
summative assessment
author_facet Muhammad Tufail Chandio
Saima Jafferi
author_sort Muhammad Tufail Chandio
title Teaching English as a Language not Subject by Employing Formative Assessment
title_short Teaching English as a Language not Subject by Employing Formative Assessment
title_full Teaching English as a Language not Subject by Employing Formative Assessment
title_fullStr Teaching English as a Language not Subject by Employing Formative Assessment
title_full_unstemmed Teaching English as a Language not Subject by Employing Formative Assessment
title_sort teaching english as a language not subject by employing formative assessment
publisher Institute of Business Management
series Journal of Education and Educational Development
issn 2310-0869
2313-3538
publishDate 2015-12-01
description English is a second language (L2) in Sindh, Pakistan. Most of the public sector schools in Sindh teach English as a subject rather than a language. Besides, they do not distinguish between generic pedagogy and distinctive approaches used for teaching English as a first language (L1) and second language (L2). In addition, the erroneous traditional assessment focuses on only writing and reading skills and the listening and speaking skills of L2 remain excluded. There is a great emphasis on summative assessments, which contribute to a qualification; however, formative assessments, which provide timely and continuous appraisal and feedback, remain ignored. Summative assessment employs only paper-and- pencil based test, while the other current means of alternative assessments like self-assessment, peer-assessment, and portfolio assessment have not been incorporated, and explored yet. Teaching English as a subject not as a language, employing summative assessment not formative, depending on paper-and-pencil based test, and not using the alternative modes of assessment are some of the questions this study will deal with. The study under discussion suggests that current approaches employed for teaching English are misplaced as these take a subject teaching approach rather than a language teaching approach. It also argues for the paradigm shift from a product to process approach to assessment by administering modern alternative assessments.
topic alternatives in assessment
English as L2
formative assessment
summative assessment
url http://journals.iobmresearch.com/index.php/JEED/article/view/444/98
work_keys_str_mv AT muhammadtufailchandio teachingenglishasalanguagenotsubjectbyemployingformativeassessment
AT saimajafferi teachingenglishasalanguagenotsubjectbyemployingformativeassessment
_version_ 1724547013376212992