Pre- and in-Service Teachers Reading and Discussing Informational Texts

This study investigates U.S. elementary (kindergarten-Grade 6, ages 5-12) pre- and in-service teachers’ discussions of informational texts to understand current practices and identify needs with respect to how teachers support students in building knowledge from complex informational text as specifi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Theresa A. Deeney
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2016-05-01
Series:SAGE Open
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016647994
id doaj-a820e4a43cf3407ab7af4fc167423e35
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a820e4a43cf3407ab7af4fc167423e352020-11-25T03:09:34ZengSAGE PublishingSAGE Open2158-24402016-05-01610.1177/215824401664799410.1177_2158244016647994Pre- and in-Service Teachers Reading and Discussing Informational TextsTheresa A. Deeney0University of Rhode Island, Kingston, USAThis study investigates U.S. elementary (kindergarten-Grade 6, ages 5-12) pre- and in-service teachers’ discussions of informational texts to understand current practices and identify needs with respect to how teachers support students in building knowledge from complex informational text as specified in the grade-level expectations of the Common Core State Standards adopted in many U.S. states. Transcripts and reflections from 17 in-service and 31 pre-service teachers’ informational text discussions were analyzed for teachers’ focus on the text, background knowledge, and text/background knowledge. In addition, transcripts were analyzed for the types of text ideas teachers targeted (details/main ideas), the comprehension demands placed on students, how teachers used follow-up moves to encourage higher level thinking, and how teachers use transcripts of their discussions to analyze and critique their own practice. Findings suggest that both pre- and in-service teachers draw heavily on students’ background knowledge and text details in their questioning; but differences exist in how pre- and in-service teachers use follow-up responses to promote knowledge building. Findings also suggest that both pre- and in-service teachers can use their transcripts to recognize areas of need, and offer themselves suggestions to better support students’ understanding. Implications are offered for teacher education and professional development.https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016647994
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Theresa A. Deeney
spellingShingle Theresa A. Deeney
Pre- and in-Service Teachers Reading and Discussing Informational Texts
SAGE Open
author_facet Theresa A. Deeney
author_sort Theresa A. Deeney
title Pre- and in-Service Teachers Reading and Discussing Informational Texts
title_short Pre- and in-Service Teachers Reading and Discussing Informational Texts
title_full Pre- and in-Service Teachers Reading and Discussing Informational Texts
title_fullStr Pre- and in-Service Teachers Reading and Discussing Informational Texts
title_full_unstemmed Pre- and in-Service Teachers Reading and Discussing Informational Texts
title_sort pre- and in-service teachers reading and discussing informational texts
publisher SAGE Publishing
series SAGE Open
issn 2158-2440
publishDate 2016-05-01
description This study investigates U.S. elementary (kindergarten-Grade 6, ages 5-12) pre- and in-service teachers’ discussions of informational texts to understand current practices and identify needs with respect to how teachers support students in building knowledge from complex informational text as specified in the grade-level expectations of the Common Core State Standards adopted in many U.S. states. Transcripts and reflections from 17 in-service and 31 pre-service teachers’ informational text discussions were analyzed for teachers’ focus on the text, background knowledge, and text/background knowledge. In addition, transcripts were analyzed for the types of text ideas teachers targeted (details/main ideas), the comprehension demands placed on students, how teachers used follow-up moves to encourage higher level thinking, and how teachers use transcripts of their discussions to analyze and critique their own practice. Findings suggest that both pre- and in-service teachers draw heavily on students’ background knowledge and text details in their questioning; but differences exist in how pre- and in-service teachers use follow-up responses to promote knowledge building. Findings also suggest that both pre- and in-service teachers can use their transcripts to recognize areas of need, and offer themselves suggestions to better support students’ understanding. Implications are offered for teacher education and professional development.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016647994
work_keys_str_mv AT theresaadeeney preandinserviceteachersreadinganddiscussinginformationaltexts
_version_ 1724661928350973952