Grade Retention
Academic accountability is of great concern, therefore grade retention is being considered for both students with and without disabilities who are not meeting end-of-the-year achievement benchmarks. The purpose of this study was to investigate teacher attitudes toward grade retention and whether pra...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2013-04-01
|
Series: | SAGE Open |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244013486993 |
id |
doaj-a1bd1aa8144b4785b1f430bf262b923a |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-a1bd1aa8144b4785b1f430bf262b923a2020-11-25T03:22:47ZengSAGE PublishingSAGE Open2158-24402013-04-01310.1177/215824401348699310.1177_2158244013486993Grade RetentionGia A. Renaud0 Salve Regina University, Newport, RI, USAAcademic accountability is of great concern, therefore grade retention is being considered for both students with and without disabilities who are not meeting end-of-the-year achievement benchmarks. The purpose of this study was to investigate teacher attitudes toward grade retention and whether practices differ when recommending retention of students with or without disabilities. This mixed-methods study utilized a paper-and-pencil questionnaire using a Likert-type scale, as well as two open-ended questions and a checklist. Teacher interviews were also conducted. The findings of this study indicate that teachers are considering a multitude of factors when considering grade retention for their struggling students. Academic performance was the factor that teachers (77%) indicated the most frequently. Although teachers felt pressure and accountability from high stakes testing, they felt test results should be one of many factors considered in the retention decision.https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244013486993 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Gia A. Renaud |
spellingShingle |
Gia A. Renaud Grade Retention SAGE Open |
author_facet |
Gia A. Renaud |
author_sort |
Gia A. Renaud |
title |
Grade Retention |
title_short |
Grade Retention |
title_full |
Grade Retention |
title_fullStr |
Grade Retention |
title_full_unstemmed |
Grade Retention |
title_sort |
grade retention |
publisher |
SAGE Publishing |
series |
SAGE Open |
issn |
2158-2440 |
publishDate |
2013-04-01 |
description |
Academic accountability is of great concern, therefore grade retention is being considered for both students with and without disabilities who are not meeting end-of-the-year achievement benchmarks. The purpose of this study was to investigate teacher attitudes toward grade retention and whether practices differ when recommending retention of students with or without disabilities. This mixed-methods study utilized a paper-and-pencil questionnaire using a Likert-type scale, as well as two open-ended questions and a checklist. Teacher interviews were also conducted. The findings of this study indicate that teachers are considering a multitude of factors when considering grade retention for their struggling students. Academic performance was the factor that teachers (77%) indicated the most frequently. Although teachers felt pressure and accountability from high stakes testing, they felt test results should be one of many factors considered in the retention decision. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244013486993 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT giaarenaud graderetention |
_version_ |
1724609612205785088 |