Methods and Evaluation Tools Commonly Used by Islamic Studies Teachers of Basic and Secondary Stages in Jordan

This study aimed at the identification of the methods and evaluation tools commonly used by Islamic Studies teachers of the basic and secondary stages in Jordan in the light of the variables of sex, academic qualification, and experience. The sample consisted of 143 male and female teachers of Islam...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Majed Al-Jallad
Format: Article
Language:Arabic
Published: King Saud University 2001-06-01
Series:Journal of Educational Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://jes.ksu.edu.sa/sites/jes.ksu.edu.sa/files/0013-02-04_0.pdf
id doaj-a134c4cf7fa043219adcd8edf91a0548
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a134c4cf7fa043219adcd8edf91a05482020-11-24T21:58:57ZaraKing Saud UniversityJournal of Educational Sciences1658-78631658-76772001-06-01132281313Methods and Evaluation Tools Commonly Used by Islamic Studies Teachers of Basic and Secondary Stages in JordanMajed Al-JalladThis study aimed at the identification of the methods and evaluation tools commonly used by Islamic Studies teachers of the basic and secondary stages in Jordan in the light of the variables of sex, academic qualification, and experience. The sample consisted of 143 male and female teachers of Islamic Studies, selected randomly. Their perceptions were elicited by a questionnaire especially designed by the researcher which comprised 33 items distributed over six dimensions. The main findings of the present study showed that the first dimension, using behavioral objectives in the evaluation of the students' achievement in the different Islamic Studies disciplines, had obtained the highest means, while the third dimension, using the evaluation tools for assessing the affective domain obtained the lowest means. The analysis demonstrated no significant effects in favor of the variables of sex and academic qualification on the level of teachers' use of the methods and evaluation tools stated in the study instrument. On the other hand, the findings showed significant differences between the teachers' means for the implementation degree due to experience and in favor of long experienced teachers.https://jes.ksu.edu.sa/sites/jes.ksu.edu.sa/files/0013-02-04_0.pdfIslamic StudiesTeachersBasic StagesSecondary StagesJordanAcademic qualificationEvaluation MethodsEvaluation Tools
collection DOAJ
language Arabic
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Majed Al-Jallad
spellingShingle Majed Al-Jallad
Methods and Evaluation Tools Commonly Used by Islamic Studies Teachers of Basic and Secondary Stages in Jordan
Journal of Educational Sciences
Islamic Studies
Teachers
Basic Stages
Secondary Stages
Jordan
Academic qualification
Evaluation Methods
Evaluation Tools
author_facet Majed Al-Jallad
author_sort Majed Al-Jallad
title Methods and Evaluation Tools Commonly Used by Islamic Studies Teachers of Basic and Secondary Stages in Jordan
title_short Methods and Evaluation Tools Commonly Used by Islamic Studies Teachers of Basic and Secondary Stages in Jordan
title_full Methods and Evaluation Tools Commonly Used by Islamic Studies Teachers of Basic and Secondary Stages in Jordan
title_fullStr Methods and Evaluation Tools Commonly Used by Islamic Studies Teachers of Basic and Secondary Stages in Jordan
title_full_unstemmed Methods and Evaluation Tools Commonly Used by Islamic Studies Teachers of Basic and Secondary Stages in Jordan
title_sort methods and evaluation tools commonly used by islamic studies teachers of basic and secondary stages in jordan
publisher King Saud University
series Journal of Educational Sciences
issn 1658-7863
1658-7677
publishDate 2001-06-01
description This study aimed at the identification of the methods and evaluation tools commonly used by Islamic Studies teachers of the basic and secondary stages in Jordan in the light of the variables of sex, academic qualification, and experience. The sample consisted of 143 male and female teachers of Islamic Studies, selected randomly. Their perceptions were elicited by a questionnaire especially designed by the researcher which comprised 33 items distributed over six dimensions. The main findings of the present study showed that the first dimension, using behavioral objectives in the evaluation of the students' achievement in the different Islamic Studies disciplines, had obtained the highest means, while the third dimension, using the evaluation tools for assessing the affective domain obtained the lowest means. The analysis demonstrated no significant effects in favor of the variables of sex and academic qualification on the level of teachers' use of the methods and evaluation tools stated in the study instrument. On the other hand, the findings showed significant differences between the teachers' means for the implementation degree due to experience and in favor of long experienced teachers.
topic Islamic Studies
Teachers
Basic Stages
Secondary Stages
Jordan
Academic qualification
Evaluation Methods
Evaluation Tools
url https://jes.ksu.edu.sa/sites/jes.ksu.edu.sa/files/0013-02-04_0.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT majedaljallad methodsandevaluationtoolscommonlyusedbyislamicstudiesteachersofbasicandsecondarystagesinjordan
_version_ 1725850079796920320