Moral investing: Psychological motivations and implications
In four experiments we showed that investors are not only interested in maximizing returns but have non-financial goals, too. We considered what drives the decision to invest ethically and the impact this strategy has on people's evaluation of investment performance. In Study 1, participants w...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Society for Judgment and Decision Making
2015-01-01
|
Series: | Judgment and Decision Making |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journal.sjdm.org/14/14513a/jdm14513a.pdf |
id |
doaj-a0a75c4b762e455bb792db4149ac9c0b |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-a0a75c4b762e455bb792db4149ac9c0b2021-05-02T06:12:14ZengSociety for Judgment and Decision MakingJudgment and Decision Making1930-29752015-01-011016475Moral investing: Psychological motivations and implicationsEnrico RubaltelliLorella LottoIlana RitovRino Rumiati In four experiments we showed that investors are not only interested in maximizing returns but have non-financial goals, too. We considered what drives the decision to invest ethically and the impact this strategy has on people's evaluation of investment performance. In Study 1, participants who chose a moral portfolio (over an immoral one) reported being less interested in maximizing their gains and more interested in being true to their moral values. These participants also reported feeling lower disappointment upon learning that a different decision could have yield a better outcome. In Studies 2 and 3, we replicated these findings when investors decided not to invest in immoral assets, rather than when they choose to invest morally. In Study 4, we found similar results using the same industrial sector in both the moral and the immoral conditions and providing participants with information about the expected return of the portfolio they were presented with. These findings lend empirical support to the conclusion that investors have both utilitarian (financial) goals and expressive (non-financial) ones and show how non-financial motivations can influence the reaction to unsatisfactory investment performance.http://journal.sjdm.org/14/14513a/jdm14513a.pdfethical behavior behavioral finance choice emotion.NAKeywords |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Enrico Rubaltelli Lorella Lotto Ilana Ritov Rino Rumiati |
spellingShingle |
Enrico Rubaltelli Lorella Lotto Ilana Ritov Rino Rumiati Moral investing: Psychological motivations and implications Judgment and Decision Making ethical behavior behavioral finance choice emotion.NAKeywords |
author_facet |
Enrico Rubaltelli Lorella Lotto Ilana Ritov Rino Rumiati |
author_sort |
Enrico Rubaltelli |
title |
Moral investing:
Psychological motivations and implications |
title_short |
Moral investing:
Psychological motivations and implications |
title_full |
Moral investing:
Psychological motivations and implications |
title_fullStr |
Moral investing:
Psychological motivations and implications |
title_full_unstemmed |
Moral investing:
Psychological motivations and implications |
title_sort |
moral investing:
psychological motivations and implications |
publisher |
Society for Judgment and Decision Making |
series |
Judgment and Decision Making |
issn |
1930-2975 |
publishDate |
2015-01-01 |
description |
In four experiments
we showed that investors are not only interested in maximizing returns but have
non-financial goals, too. We considered what drives the decision to invest
ethically and the impact this strategy has on people's evaluation of investment
performance. In Study 1, participants who chose a moral portfolio (over an
immoral one) reported being less interested in maximizing their gains and more
interested in being true to their moral values. These participants also
reported feeling lower disappointment upon learning that a different decision
could have yield a better outcome. In Studies 2 and 3, we replicated these
findings when investors decided not to invest in immoral assets, rather than
when they choose to invest morally. In Study 4, we found similar results using
the same industrial sector in both the moral and the immoral conditions and
providing participants with information about the expected return of the
portfolio they were presented with. These findings lend empirical support to
the conclusion that investors have both utilitarian (financial) goals and
expressive (non-financial) ones and show how non-financial motivations can
influence the reaction to unsatisfactory investment performance. |
topic |
ethical behavior behavioral finance choice emotion.NAKeywords |
url |
http://journal.sjdm.org/14/14513a/jdm14513a.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT enricorubaltelli moralinvestingpsychologicalmotivationsandimplications AT lorellalotto moralinvestingpsychologicalmotivationsandimplications AT ilanaritov moralinvestingpsychologicalmotivationsandimplications AT rinorumiati moralinvestingpsychologicalmotivationsandimplications |
_version_ |
1721494467558506496 |