Energy Loss in a MEMS Disk Resonator Gyroscope

Analysing and minimizing energy loss is crucial for high performance disk resonator gyroscopes (DRGs). Generally, the primary energy loss mechanism for high vacuum packaged microelectromechanical system (MEMS) resonators includes thermoelastic damping, anchor loss, and electronic damping. In this pa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jianbing Xie, Yongcun Hao, Weizheng Yuan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019-07-01
Series:Micromachines
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2072-666X/10/8/493
id doaj-9fc5b738374e4987baf830866423dccf
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9fc5b738374e4987baf830866423dccf2020-11-25T02:45:27ZengMDPI AGMicromachines2072-666X2019-07-0110849310.3390/mi10080493mi10080493Energy Loss in a MEMS Disk Resonator GyroscopeJianbing Xie0Yongcun Hao1Weizheng Yuan2School of Mechanical Engineering, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an 710072, ChinaSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an 710072, ChinaSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an 710072, ChinaAnalysing and minimizing energy loss is crucial for high performance disk resonator gyroscopes (DRGs). Generally, the primary energy loss mechanism for high vacuum packaged microelectromechanical system (MEMS) resonators includes thermoelastic damping, anchor loss, and electronic damping. In this paper, the thermoelastic damping, anchor loss, and electronic damping for our DRG design are calculated by combining finite element analysis and theoretical derivation. Thermoelastic damping is the dominant energy loss mechanism and contributes over 90% of the total dissipated energy. Benefiting from a symmetrical structure, the anchor loss is low and can be neglected. However, the electronic damping determined by the testing circuit contributes 2.6%−9.6% when the bias voltage increases from 10 V to 20 V, which has a considerable impact on the total quality factor (Q). For comparison, the gyroscope is fabricated and seal-packaged with a measured maximum Q range of 141k to 132k when the bias voltage varies. In conclusion, thermoelastic damping and electronic damping essentially determine the Q of the DRG. Thus, optimizing the resonance structure and testing the circuit to reduce energy loss is prioritized for a high-performance DRG design.https://www.mdpi.com/2072-666X/10/8/493disk resonator gyroscope (DRG)quality factor (Q)energy lossthermoelastic dampinganchor losselectronic damping
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jianbing Xie
Yongcun Hao
Weizheng Yuan
spellingShingle Jianbing Xie
Yongcun Hao
Weizheng Yuan
Energy Loss in a MEMS Disk Resonator Gyroscope
Micromachines
disk resonator gyroscope (DRG)
quality factor (Q)
energy loss
thermoelastic damping
anchor loss
electronic damping
author_facet Jianbing Xie
Yongcun Hao
Weizheng Yuan
author_sort Jianbing Xie
title Energy Loss in a MEMS Disk Resonator Gyroscope
title_short Energy Loss in a MEMS Disk Resonator Gyroscope
title_full Energy Loss in a MEMS Disk Resonator Gyroscope
title_fullStr Energy Loss in a MEMS Disk Resonator Gyroscope
title_full_unstemmed Energy Loss in a MEMS Disk Resonator Gyroscope
title_sort energy loss in a mems disk resonator gyroscope
publisher MDPI AG
series Micromachines
issn 2072-666X
publishDate 2019-07-01
description Analysing and minimizing energy loss is crucial for high performance disk resonator gyroscopes (DRGs). Generally, the primary energy loss mechanism for high vacuum packaged microelectromechanical system (MEMS) resonators includes thermoelastic damping, anchor loss, and electronic damping. In this paper, the thermoelastic damping, anchor loss, and electronic damping for our DRG design are calculated by combining finite element analysis and theoretical derivation. Thermoelastic damping is the dominant energy loss mechanism and contributes over 90% of the total dissipated energy. Benefiting from a symmetrical structure, the anchor loss is low and can be neglected. However, the electronic damping determined by the testing circuit contributes 2.6%−9.6% when the bias voltage increases from 10 V to 20 V, which has a considerable impact on the total quality factor (Q). For comparison, the gyroscope is fabricated and seal-packaged with a measured maximum Q range of 141k to 132k when the bias voltage varies. In conclusion, thermoelastic damping and electronic damping essentially determine the Q of the DRG. Thus, optimizing the resonance structure and testing the circuit to reduce energy loss is prioritized for a high-performance DRG design.
topic disk resonator gyroscope (DRG)
quality factor (Q)
energy loss
thermoelastic damping
anchor loss
electronic damping
url https://www.mdpi.com/2072-666X/10/8/493
work_keys_str_mv AT jianbingxie energylossinamemsdiskresonatorgyroscope
AT yongcunhao energylossinamemsdiskresonatorgyroscope
AT weizhengyuan energylossinamemsdiskresonatorgyroscope
_version_ 1724762691264839680