L’apprentissage de comportements de conduite sécuritaires : quelles modalités pédagogiques en formation ?

This research consists in analyzing the effect of some pedagogical methods recommended in the EU-project GADGET report (Siegrist, 1999) on the reach of the superior levels of Keskinen’s structure of goals in driver training. Following its conclusions, driver training must target a better self-knowle...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Christine Poplimont, Maéva Duchène
Format: Article
Language:fra
Published: Université de Provence 2013-07-01
Series:Questions Vives
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/questionsvives/1329
id doaj-9f908badf85e4eb69b52413150dfcf8f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9f908badf85e4eb69b52413150dfcf8f2020-11-25T00:06:19ZfraUniversité de ProvenceQuestions Vives1635-40791775-433X2013-07-0191912313910.4000/questionsvives.1329L’apprentissage de comportements de conduite sécuritaires : quelles modalités pédagogiques en formation ?Christine PoplimontMaéva DuchèneThis research consists in analyzing the effect of some pedagogical methods recommended in the EU-project GADGET report (Siegrist, 1999) on the reach of the superior levels of Keskinen’s structure of goals in driver training. Following its conclusions, driver training must target a better self-knowledge (self-assessment, awareness of one’s goals for life and skills for living) so as to enter into an identity construction process (change values, goals) leading to the adoption of new safety driving behaviors. Self-knowledge appears to be the releasing factor of the identity construction process whereas behavior change is its finality. Given the importance of social interactions, especially pedagogical relationship and group dynamics in teaching modalities used in the university driving teachers and instructors training course, a university course that complies with the EU-project GADGET report (Siegrist, 1999) recommendations, our research studies the impact social interactions in training groups have on the identity construction of students. First, we start by analyzing the effects group dynamics and pedagogical relationship have on the subject at an individual level. Secondly, following the identity construction process that has been released, we describe a mimetic process leading to learning new behaviors: these two pedagogical modalities promote learning social skills through mimesis.http://journals.openedition.org/questionsvives/1329pedagogical relationshipgroup dynamicsmimesisroad safetyidentity construction process
collection DOAJ
language fra
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Christine Poplimont
Maéva Duchène
spellingShingle Christine Poplimont
Maéva Duchène
L’apprentissage de comportements de conduite sécuritaires : quelles modalités pédagogiques en formation ?
Questions Vives
pedagogical relationship
group dynamics
mimesis
road safety
identity construction process
author_facet Christine Poplimont
Maéva Duchène
author_sort Christine Poplimont
title L’apprentissage de comportements de conduite sécuritaires : quelles modalités pédagogiques en formation ?
title_short L’apprentissage de comportements de conduite sécuritaires : quelles modalités pédagogiques en formation ?
title_full L’apprentissage de comportements de conduite sécuritaires : quelles modalités pédagogiques en formation ?
title_fullStr L’apprentissage de comportements de conduite sécuritaires : quelles modalités pédagogiques en formation ?
title_full_unstemmed L’apprentissage de comportements de conduite sécuritaires : quelles modalités pédagogiques en formation ?
title_sort l’apprentissage de comportements de conduite sécuritaires : quelles modalités pédagogiques en formation ?
publisher Université de Provence
series Questions Vives
issn 1635-4079
1775-433X
publishDate 2013-07-01
description This research consists in analyzing the effect of some pedagogical methods recommended in the EU-project GADGET report (Siegrist, 1999) on the reach of the superior levels of Keskinen’s structure of goals in driver training. Following its conclusions, driver training must target a better self-knowledge (self-assessment, awareness of one’s goals for life and skills for living) so as to enter into an identity construction process (change values, goals) leading to the adoption of new safety driving behaviors. Self-knowledge appears to be the releasing factor of the identity construction process whereas behavior change is its finality. Given the importance of social interactions, especially pedagogical relationship and group dynamics in teaching modalities used in the university driving teachers and instructors training course, a university course that complies with the EU-project GADGET report (Siegrist, 1999) recommendations, our research studies the impact social interactions in training groups have on the identity construction of students. First, we start by analyzing the effects group dynamics and pedagogical relationship have on the subject at an individual level. Secondly, following the identity construction process that has been released, we describe a mimetic process leading to learning new behaviors: these two pedagogical modalities promote learning social skills through mimesis.
topic pedagogical relationship
group dynamics
mimesis
road safety
identity construction process
url http://journals.openedition.org/questionsvives/1329
work_keys_str_mv AT christinepoplimont lapprentissagedecomportementsdeconduitesecuritairesquellesmodalitespedagogiquesenformation
AT maevaduchene lapprentissagedecomportementsdeconduitesecuritairesquellesmodalitespedagogiquesenformation
_version_ 1725422746061504512