L2 Learners’ Strategy Preference in Metaphorical Test Performance: Effects of Working Memory and Cognitive Style

Although investigating the factors that influence test scores is important, a majority of stakeholders show a paucity of attention towards individual learner differences due to having large classes of L2 learners. This study sought to explore the possible effect of working memory and cognitive style...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mahmood Hashemian, Batool Fadaei
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Allameh Tabataba'i University Press 2013-08-01
Series:Issues in Language Teaching
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ilt.atu.ac.ir/article_1345_39de8a2ffb49b10588005507bda52f13.pdf
id doaj-9d46dc7b37984780974bce4f1cadc197
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9d46dc7b37984780974bce4f1cadc1972020-11-25T04:02:36ZengAllameh Tabataba'i University PressIssues in Language Teaching2322-37152476-61942013-08-01122973211345L2 Learners’ Strategy Preference in Metaphorical Test Performance: Effects of Working Memory and Cognitive StyleMahmood Hashemian0Batool Fadaei1Ph.D. in Applied Linguistics, Shahrekord University, IranM.A. in TEFL, Shahrekord University, IranAlthough investigating the factors that influence test scores is important, a majority of stakeholders show a paucity of attention towards individual learner differences due to having large classes of L2 learners. This study sought to explore the possible effect of working memory and cognitive style on L2 learners’ metaphorical test performance. The study was conducted in 2 phases. The first phase was quantitative, and the second consisted of a series of case studies using “think-aloud protocol” and “retrospection.” In the statistical phase, aimed at shedding light on the effect of the cognitive style of field (in)dependence (FI/FD) on metaphorical test performance, 80 senior undergraduates majoring in English Translation were selected through a truncated test of TOEFL adopted from Barron (2004). Metaphorical test performance was analyzed through recognition, text-based true-false, and scripturally implicit questions, refined by conducting factor analysis. Moreover, the participants’ cognitive style of FI/FD was identified via GEFT. In the qualitative part, after analyzing the verbal reports of 8 informants, the participants’ strategy preferences were examined. Results revealed the impact of the cognitive style of FI/FD and working memory on the participants’ strategy preferences. Due to the advent of learner-centered approaches, this study has some implications for L2 pedagogy discussed in the paper.https://ilt.atu.ac.ir/article_1345_39de8a2ffb49b10588005507bda52f13.pdfmetaphorical test performanceworking memorycognitive style of field (in)dependence (fi/fd)
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mahmood Hashemian
Batool Fadaei
spellingShingle Mahmood Hashemian
Batool Fadaei
L2 Learners’ Strategy Preference in Metaphorical Test Performance: Effects of Working Memory and Cognitive Style
Issues in Language Teaching
metaphorical test performance
working memory
cognitive style of field (in)dependence (fi/fd)
author_facet Mahmood Hashemian
Batool Fadaei
author_sort Mahmood Hashemian
title L2 Learners’ Strategy Preference in Metaphorical Test Performance: Effects of Working Memory and Cognitive Style
title_short L2 Learners’ Strategy Preference in Metaphorical Test Performance: Effects of Working Memory and Cognitive Style
title_full L2 Learners’ Strategy Preference in Metaphorical Test Performance: Effects of Working Memory and Cognitive Style
title_fullStr L2 Learners’ Strategy Preference in Metaphorical Test Performance: Effects of Working Memory and Cognitive Style
title_full_unstemmed L2 Learners’ Strategy Preference in Metaphorical Test Performance: Effects of Working Memory and Cognitive Style
title_sort l2 learners’ strategy preference in metaphorical test performance: effects of working memory and cognitive style
publisher Allameh Tabataba'i University Press
series Issues in Language Teaching
issn 2322-3715
2476-6194
publishDate 2013-08-01
description Although investigating the factors that influence test scores is important, a majority of stakeholders show a paucity of attention towards individual learner differences due to having large classes of L2 learners. This study sought to explore the possible effect of working memory and cognitive style on L2 learners’ metaphorical test performance. The study was conducted in 2 phases. The first phase was quantitative, and the second consisted of a series of case studies using “think-aloud protocol” and “retrospection.” In the statistical phase, aimed at shedding light on the effect of the cognitive style of field (in)dependence (FI/FD) on metaphorical test performance, 80 senior undergraduates majoring in English Translation were selected through a truncated test of TOEFL adopted from Barron (2004). Metaphorical test performance was analyzed through recognition, text-based true-false, and scripturally implicit questions, refined by conducting factor analysis. Moreover, the participants’ cognitive style of FI/FD was identified via GEFT. In the qualitative part, after analyzing the verbal reports of 8 informants, the participants’ strategy preferences were examined. Results revealed the impact of the cognitive style of FI/FD and working memory on the participants’ strategy preferences. Due to the advent of learner-centered approaches, this study has some implications for L2 pedagogy discussed in the paper.
topic metaphorical test performance
working memory
cognitive style of field (in)dependence (fi/fd)
url https://ilt.atu.ac.ir/article_1345_39de8a2ffb49b10588005507bda52f13.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT mahmoodhashemian l2learnersstrategypreferenceinmetaphoricaltestperformanceeffectsofworkingmemoryandcognitivestyle
AT batoolfadaei l2learnersstrategypreferenceinmetaphoricaltestperformanceeffectsofworkingmemoryandcognitivestyle
_version_ 1724443011368091648