Polarized training in endurance sports: A systematic review

Objectives. To review the literature that exists around the effects of polarized training distributions on endurance sport performance, particularly studies that compare the mentioned distribution with other commonly used such as threshold training. Methodology. Two independent researchers performe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sebastian Sitko, Isaac López Laval
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Asociación Para el Progreso de la Biomedicina 2019-08-01
Series:Jounal of Negative and No Positive Results
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.jonnpr.com/PDF/2963.pdf
id doaj-9ce400ae71ca46d1830f44d3ae991b37
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9ce400ae71ca46d1830f44d3ae991b372020-11-25T01:27:47ZengAsociación Para el Progreso de la BiomedicinaJounal of Negative and No Positive Results2529-850X2529-850X2019-08-014879680510.19230/jonnpr.2963Polarized training in endurance sports: A systematic reviewSebastian Sitko0Isaac López Laval1Grupo de investigación Movimiento Humano, Universidad de Zaragoza. SpainGrupo de investigación Movimiento Humano, Universidad de Zaragoza. SpainObjectives. To review the literature that exists around the effects of polarized training distributions on endurance sport performance, particularly studies that compare the mentioned distribution with other commonly used such as threshold training. Methodology. Two independent researchers performed a search within four different databases using the terms “Polarized training” AND “Performance”. Full text articles that studied the effects of polarized training distributions of at least six weeks of duration were included in the review. Polarized training was defined as at least 60% of the training time below ventilatory threshold 1 and no more than 20% of the time above ventilatory threshold 2. In all the studies performance measures were performed before and after the intervention protocol. The search was performed up to and including 1st December 2018. Results. 6 studies including a total of 153 subjects were included in the final review. Four of the studies showed significant improvements over the control groups in the parameters measured in the studies. One of the studies did not include a control group but also showed significant improvements after the training program. The last study did not find any significant differences between the intervention and control groups. Conclusions. Polarized training is an optimal load distribution method in endurance sports, with results almost always superior to those obtained through other common distributions such as threshold training. More research is needed in order to validate the results obtained in this review. https://www.jonnpr.com/PDF/2963.pdfPolarized trainingenduranceperformance
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sebastian Sitko
Isaac López Laval
spellingShingle Sebastian Sitko
Isaac López Laval
Polarized training in endurance sports: A systematic review
Jounal of Negative and No Positive Results
Polarized training
endurance
performance
author_facet Sebastian Sitko
Isaac López Laval
author_sort Sebastian Sitko
title Polarized training in endurance sports: A systematic review
title_short Polarized training in endurance sports: A systematic review
title_full Polarized training in endurance sports: A systematic review
title_fullStr Polarized training in endurance sports: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Polarized training in endurance sports: A systematic review
title_sort polarized training in endurance sports: a systematic review
publisher Asociación Para el Progreso de la Biomedicina
series Jounal of Negative and No Positive Results
issn 2529-850X
2529-850X
publishDate 2019-08-01
description Objectives. To review the literature that exists around the effects of polarized training distributions on endurance sport performance, particularly studies that compare the mentioned distribution with other commonly used such as threshold training. Methodology. Two independent researchers performed a search within four different databases using the terms “Polarized training” AND “Performance”. Full text articles that studied the effects of polarized training distributions of at least six weeks of duration were included in the review. Polarized training was defined as at least 60% of the training time below ventilatory threshold 1 and no more than 20% of the time above ventilatory threshold 2. In all the studies performance measures were performed before and after the intervention protocol. The search was performed up to and including 1st December 2018. Results. 6 studies including a total of 153 subjects were included in the final review. Four of the studies showed significant improvements over the control groups in the parameters measured in the studies. One of the studies did not include a control group but also showed significant improvements after the training program. The last study did not find any significant differences between the intervention and control groups. Conclusions. Polarized training is an optimal load distribution method in endurance sports, with results almost always superior to those obtained through other common distributions such as threshold training. More research is needed in order to validate the results obtained in this review.
topic Polarized training
endurance
performance
url https://www.jonnpr.com/PDF/2963.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT sebastiansitko polarizedtraininginendurancesportsasystematicreview
AT isaaclopezlaval polarizedtraininginendurancesportsasystematicreview
_version_ 1725103272567504896