Listening and Speaking for Real-World Communication: What Teachers Do and What Students Learn From Classroom Assessments

Even though standardized international communication tests have been frequently studied, very little research has explored how teachers planned listening and speaking classroom assessments or which classroom-based tests were more beneficial for teaching real-world English communication. A qualitativ...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Melissa H. Yu, Barry Lee Reynolds, Chen Ding
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2021-04-01
Series:SAGE Open
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211009163
id doaj-9c17c256b7174696b3d0ea2c88c44dbd
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9c17c256b7174696b3d0ea2c88c44dbd2021-04-19T23:03:33ZengSAGE PublishingSAGE Open2158-24402021-04-011110.1177/21582440211009163Listening and Speaking for Real-World Communication: What Teachers Do and What Students Learn From Classroom AssessmentsMelissa H. Yu0Barry Lee Reynolds1Chen Ding2University of Macau, Faculty of Education, Taipa, Macau SAR, ChinaUniversity of Macau, Centre for Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Taipa, Macau SAR, ChinaUniversity of Macau, Faculty of Education, Taipa, Macau SAR, ChinaEven though standardized international communication tests have been frequently studied, very little research has explored how teachers planned listening and speaking classroom assessments or which classroom-based tests were more beneficial for teaching real-world English communication. A qualitative inquiry was undertaken to investigate these assessment issues among five English as foreign language teachers and 24 of their students through the collection and analysis of classroom observation and post assessment interview data. While teachers tended to draw on textbook listening and speaking activities to assess those skills, how they graded students focused heavily on the students’ communicative competence as listeners and speakers of English rather than on their ability to answer comprehension questions correctly in the classroom assessments. Students identified a mismatch between classroom instruction and assessments and also a mismatch between the English used in assessments and the English used in real-world communication.https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211009163
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Melissa H. Yu
Barry Lee Reynolds
Chen Ding
spellingShingle Melissa H. Yu
Barry Lee Reynolds
Chen Ding
Listening and Speaking for Real-World Communication: What Teachers Do and What Students Learn From Classroom Assessments
SAGE Open
author_facet Melissa H. Yu
Barry Lee Reynolds
Chen Ding
author_sort Melissa H. Yu
title Listening and Speaking for Real-World Communication: What Teachers Do and What Students Learn From Classroom Assessments
title_short Listening and Speaking for Real-World Communication: What Teachers Do and What Students Learn From Classroom Assessments
title_full Listening and Speaking for Real-World Communication: What Teachers Do and What Students Learn From Classroom Assessments
title_fullStr Listening and Speaking for Real-World Communication: What Teachers Do and What Students Learn From Classroom Assessments
title_full_unstemmed Listening and Speaking for Real-World Communication: What Teachers Do and What Students Learn From Classroom Assessments
title_sort listening and speaking for real-world communication: what teachers do and what students learn from classroom assessments
publisher SAGE Publishing
series SAGE Open
issn 2158-2440
publishDate 2021-04-01
description Even though standardized international communication tests have been frequently studied, very little research has explored how teachers planned listening and speaking classroom assessments or which classroom-based tests were more beneficial for teaching real-world English communication. A qualitative inquiry was undertaken to investigate these assessment issues among five English as foreign language teachers and 24 of their students through the collection and analysis of classroom observation and post assessment interview data. While teachers tended to draw on textbook listening and speaking activities to assess those skills, how they graded students focused heavily on the students’ communicative competence as listeners and speakers of English rather than on their ability to answer comprehension questions correctly in the classroom assessments. Students identified a mismatch between classroom instruction and assessments and also a mismatch between the English used in assessments and the English used in real-world communication.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211009163
work_keys_str_mv AT melissahyu listeningandspeakingforrealworldcommunicationwhatteachersdoandwhatstudentslearnfromclassroomassessments
AT barryleereynolds listeningandspeakingforrealworldcommunicationwhatteachersdoandwhatstudentslearnfromclassroomassessments
AT chending listeningandspeakingforrealworldcommunicationwhatteachersdoandwhatstudentslearnfromclassroomassessments
_version_ 1721518974822252544