Public Acceptance of Plant Biotechnology and GM Crops
A wide gap exists between the rapid acceptance of genetically modified (GM) crops for cultivation by farmers in many countries and in the global markets for food and feed, and the often-limited acceptance by consumers. This review contrasts the advances of practical applications of agricultural biot...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2015-07-01
|
Series: | Viruses |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.mdpi.com/1999-4915/7/8/2819 |
id |
doaj-9a395526c17f4b3a8d8c42fa42e558c0 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-9a395526c17f4b3a8d8c42fa42e558c02020-11-24T23:04:33ZengMDPI AGViruses1999-49152015-07-01784254428110.3390/v7082819v7082819Public Acceptance of Plant Biotechnology and GM CropsJan M. Lucht0Scienceindustries, Swiss Business Association Chemistry Pharma Biotech, P.O. Box 1826, Zurich CH-8021, SwitzerlandA wide gap exists between the rapid acceptance of genetically modified (GM) crops for cultivation by farmers in many countries and in the global markets for food and feed, and the often-limited acceptance by consumers. This review contrasts the advances of practical applications of agricultural biotechnology with the divergent paths—also affecting the development of virus resistant transgenic crops—of political and regulatory frameworks for GM crops and food in different parts of the world. These have also shaped the different opinions of consumers. Important factors influencing consumer’s attitudes are the perception of risks and benefits, knowledge and trust, and personal values. Recent political and societal developments show a hardening of the negative environment for agricultural biotechnology in Europe, a growing discussion—including calls for labeling of GM food—in the USA, and a careful development in China towards a possible authorization of GM rice that takes the societal discussions into account. New breeding techniques address some consumers’ concerns with transgenic crops, but it is not clear yet how consumers’ attitudes towards them will develop. Discussions about agriculture would be more productive, if they would focus less on technologies, but on common aims and underlying values.http://www.mdpi.com/1999-4915/7/8/2819farmersconsumersrisk/benefit perceptionknowledgetrustpersonal attitudespoliticsGMO labelingnew breeding techniques |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Jan M. Lucht |
spellingShingle |
Jan M. Lucht Public Acceptance of Plant Biotechnology and GM Crops Viruses farmers consumers risk/benefit perception knowledge trust personal attitudes politics GMO labeling new breeding techniques |
author_facet |
Jan M. Lucht |
author_sort |
Jan M. Lucht |
title |
Public Acceptance of Plant Biotechnology and GM Crops |
title_short |
Public Acceptance of Plant Biotechnology and GM Crops |
title_full |
Public Acceptance of Plant Biotechnology and GM Crops |
title_fullStr |
Public Acceptance of Plant Biotechnology and GM Crops |
title_full_unstemmed |
Public Acceptance of Plant Biotechnology and GM Crops |
title_sort |
public acceptance of plant biotechnology and gm crops |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Viruses |
issn |
1999-4915 |
publishDate |
2015-07-01 |
description |
A wide gap exists between the rapid acceptance of genetically modified (GM) crops for cultivation by farmers in many countries and in the global markets for food and feed, and the often-limited acceptance by consumers. This review contrasts the advances of practical applications of agricultural biotechnology with the divergent paths—also affecting the development of virus resistant transgenic crops—of political and regulatory frameworks for GM crops and food in different parts of the world. These have also shaped the different opinions of consumers. Important factors influencing consumer’s attitudes are the perception of risks and benefits, knowledge and trust, and personal values. Recent political and societal developments show a hardening of the negative environment for agricultural biotechnology in Europe, a growing discussion—including calls for labeling of GM food—in the USA, and a careful development in China towards a possible authorization of GM rice that takes the societal discussions into account. New breeding techniques address some consumers’ concerns with transgenic crops, but it is not clear yet how consumers’ attitudes towards them will develop. Discussions about agriculture would be more productive, if they would focus less on technologies, but on common aims and underlying values. |
topic |
farmers consumers risk/benefit perception knowledge trust personal attitudes politics GMO labeling new breeding techniques |
url |
http://www.mdpi.com/1999-4915/7/8/2819 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT janmlucht publicacceptanceofplantbiotechnologyandgmcrops |
_version_ |
1725629670860259328 |