Public Acceptance of Plant Biotechnology and GM Crops

A wide gap exists between the rapid acceptance of genetically modified (GM) crops for cultivation by farmers in many countries and in the global markets for food and feed, and the often-limited acceptance by consumers. This review contrasts the advances of practical applications of agricultural biot...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jan M. Lucht
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2015-07-01
Series:Viruses
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/1999-4915/7/8/2819
id doaj-9a395526c17f4b3a8d8c42fa42e558c0
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9a395526c17f4b3a8d8c42fa42e558c02020-11-24T23:04:33ZengMDPI AGViruses1999-49152015-07-01784254428110.3390/v7082819v7082819Public Acceptance of Plant Biotechnology and GM CropsJan M. Lucht0Scienceindustries, Swiss Business Association Chemistry Pharma Biotech, P.O. Box 1826, Zurich CH-8021, SwitzerlandA wide gap exists between the rapid acceptance of genetically modified (GM) crops for cultivation by farmers in many countries and in the global markets for food and feed, and the often-limited acceptance by consumers. This review contrasts the advances of practical applications of agricultural biotechnology with the divergent paths—also affecting the development of virus resistant transgenic crops—of political and regulatory frameworks for GM crops and food in different parts of the world. These have also shaped the different opinions of consumers. Important factors influencing consumer’s attitudes are the perception of risks and benefits, knowledge and trust, and personal values. Recent political and societal developments show a hardening of the negative environment for agricultural biotechnology in Europe, a growing discussion—including calls for labeling of GM food—in the USA, and a careful development in China towards a possible authorization of GM rice that takes the societal discussions into account. New breeding techniques address some consumers’ concerns with transgenic crops, but it is not clear yet how consumers’ attitudes towards them will develop. Discussions about agriculture would be more productive, if they would focus less on technologies, but on common aims and underlying values.http://www.mdpi.com/1999-4915/7/8/2819farmersconsumersrisk/benefit perceptionknowledgetrustpersonal attitudespoliticsGMO labelingnew breeding techniques
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jan M. Lucht
spellingShingle Jan M. Lucht
Public Acceptance of Plant Biotechnology and GM Crops
Viruses
farmers
consumers
risk/benefit perception
knowledge
trust
personal attitudes
politics
GMO labeling
new breeding techniques
author_facet Jan M. Lucht
author_sort Jan M. Lucht
title Public Acceptance of Plant Biotechnology and GM Crops
title_short Public Acceptance of Plant Biotechnology and GM Crops
title_full Public Acceptance of Plant Biotechnology and GM Crops
title_fullStr Public Acceptance of Plant Biotechnology and GM Crops
title_full_unstemmed Public Acceptance of Plant Biotechnology and GM Crops
title_sort public acceptance of plant biotechnology and gm crops
publisher MDPI AG
series Viruses
issn 1999-4915
publishDate 2015-07-01
description A wide gap exists between the rapid acceptance of genetically modified (GM) crops for cultivation by farmers in many countries and in the global markets for food and feed, and the often-limited acceptance by consumers. This review contrasts the advances of practical applications of agricultural biotechnology with the divergent paths—also affecting the development of virus resistant transgenic crops—of political and regulatory frameworks for GM crops and food in different parts of the world. These have also shaped the different opinions of consumers. Important factors influencing consumer’s attitudes are the perception of risks and benefits, knowledge and trust, and personal values. Recent political and societal developments show a hardening of the negative environment for agricultural biotechnology in Europe, a growing discussion—including calls for labeling of GM food—in the USA, and a careful development in China towards a possible authorization of GM rice that takes the societal discussions into account. New breeding techniques address some consumers’ concerns with transgenic crops, but it is not clear yet how consumers’ attitudes towards them will develop. Discussions about agriculture would be more productive, if they would focus less on technologies, but on common aims and underlying values.
topic farmers
consumers
risk/benefit perception
knowledge
trust
personal attitudes
politics
GMO labeling
new breeding techniques
url http://www.mdpi.com/1999-4915/7/8/2819
work_keys_str_mv AT janmlucht publicacceptanceofplantbiotechnologyandgmcrops
_version_ 1725629670860259328