Protocol Analysis in Engineering Design Education Research: Observations, Limitations, and Opportunities

Background: One of the most popular methods for studying the cognitive processes of design and problem-solving activity is Protocol Analysis (PA). As such, PA has been widely used in engineering design education research. Purpose: The aim of this work is to describe how PA has been used in engineeri...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gregory Litster, Ada Hurst
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: VT Publishing 2021-01-01
Series:Studies in Engineering Education
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.seejournal.org/articles/27
id doaj-999e405fc5c9465485fe495cfac316fa
record_format Article
spelling doaj-999e405fc5c9465485fe495cfac316fa2021-09-13T08:55:06ZengVT PublishingStudies in Engineering Education2690-54502021-01-011210.21061/see.279Protocol Analysis in Engineering Design Education Research: Observations, Limitations, and OpportunitiesGregory Litster0Ada Hurst1University of WaterlooUniversity of WaterlooBackground: One of the most popular methods for studying the cognitive processes of design and problem-solving activity is Protocol Analysis (PA). As such, PA has been widely used in engineering design education research. Purpose: The aim of this work is to describe how PA has been used in engineering design education contexts, understanding the range of research questions that can be addressed by the method as well as providing some commentary on the strengths, limitations, and future directions of the method. Scope/Method: We conduct a systematic review of the literature following the PRISMA method. A search combining key terms – protocol analysis, design, engineering, student – and their variants in the Scopus database resulted in 126 articles, which were further reduced to 45 through two rounds of abstract and full-text screening. The main inclusion criteria was that the work use PA as the method to investigate design activities in an engineering educational setting. Conclusions: The use of PA has significantly contributed to understanding the cognition of students engaged in design activities and to improving engineering design education. Technological advances enable new efficiencies in protocol collection and analysis, offering promising new directions in the use of PA in more authentic learning environments.https://www.seejournal.org/articles/27protocol analysisdesign educationliterature review
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Gregory Litster
Ada Hurst
spellingShingle Gregory Litster
Ada Hurst
Protocol Analysis in Engineering Design Education Research: Observations, Limitations, and Opportunities
Studies in Engineering Education
protocol analysis
design education
literature review
author_facet Gregory Litster
Ada Hurst
author_sort Gregory Litster
title Protocol Analysis in Engineering Design Education Research: Observations, Limitations, and Opportunities
title_short Protocol Analysis in Engineering Design Education Research: Observations, Limitations, and Opportunities
title_full Protocol Analysis in Engineering Design Education Research: Observations, Limitations, and Opportunities
title_fullStr Protocol Analysis in Engineering Design Education Research: Observations, Limitations, and Opportunities
title_full_unstemmed Protocol Analysis in Engineering Design Education Research: Observations, Limitations, and Opportunities
title_sort protocol analysis in engineering design education research: observations, limitations, and opportunities
publisher VT Publishing
series Studies in Engineering Education
issn 2690-5450
publishDate 2021-01-01
description Background: One of the most popular methods for studying the cognitive processes of design and problem-solving activity is Protocol Analysis (PA). As such, PA has been widely used in engineering design education research. Purpose: The aim of this work is to describe how PA has been used in engineering design education contexts, understanding the range of research questions that can be addressed by the method as well as providing some commentary on the strengths, limitations, and future directions of the method. Scope/Method: We conduct a systematic review of the literature following the PRISMA method. A search combining key terms – protocol analysis, design, engineering, student – and their variants in the Scopus database resulted in 126 articles, which were further reduced to 45 through two rounds of abstract and full-text screening. The main inclusion criteria was that the work use PA as the method to investigate design activities in an engineering educational setting. Conclusions: The use of PA has significantly contributed to understanding the cognition of students engaged in design activities and to improving engineering design education. Technological advances enable new efficiencies in protocol collection and analysis, offering promising new directions in the use of PA in more authentic learning environments.
topic protocol analysis
design education
literature review
url https://www.seejournal.org/articles/27
work_keys_str_mv AT gregorylitster protocolanalysisinengineeringdesigneducationresearchobservationslimitationsandopportunities
AT adahurst protocolanalysisinengineeringdesigneducationresearchobservationslimitationsandopportunities
_version_ 1717381205727379456