A theoretical entropy score as a single value to express inhibitor selectivity

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Designing maximally selective ligands that act on individual targets is the dominant paradigm in drug discovery. Poor selectivity can underlie toxicity and side effects in the clinic, and for this reason compound selectivity is incre...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zaman Guido JR, Uitdehaag Joost CM
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2011-04-01
Series:BMC Bioinformatics
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/12/94
id doaj-9696f25bf2e241a3956e25cc2cb3d4c5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9696f25bf2e241a3956e25cc2cb3d4c52020-11-25T01:37:17ZengBMCBMC Bioinformatics1471-21052011-04-011219410.1186/1471-2105-12-94A theoretical entropy score as a single value to express inhibitor selectivityZaman Guido JRUitdehaag Joost CM<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Designing maximally selective ligands that act on individual targets is the dominant paradigm in drug discovery. Poor selectivity can underlie toxicity and side effects in the clinic, and for this reason compound selectivity is increasingly monitored from very early on in the drug discovery process. To make sense of large amounts of profiling data, and to determine when a compound is sufficiently selective, there is a need for a proper quantitative measure of selectivity.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Here we propose a new theoretical entropy score that can be calculated from a set of IC<sub>50 </sub>data. In contrast to previous measures such as the 'selectivity score', Gini score, or partition index, the entropy score is non-arbitary, fully exploits IC<sub>50 </sub>data, and is not dependent on a reference enzyme. In addition, the entropy score gives the most robust values with data from different sources, because it is less sensitive to errors. We apply the new score to kinase and nuclear receptor profiling data, and to high-throughput screening data. In addition, through analyzing profiles of clinical compounds, we show quantitatively that a more selective kinase inhibitor is not necessarily more drug-like.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>For quantifying selectivity from panel profiling, a theoretical entropy score is the best method. It is valuable for studying the molecular mechanisms of selectivity, and to steer compound progression in drug discovery programs.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/12/94
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Zaman Guido JR
Uitdehaag Joost CM
spellingShingle Zaman Guido JR
Uitdehaag Joost CM
A theoretical entropy score as a single value to express inhibitor selectivity
BMC Bioinformatics
author_facet Zaman Guido JR
Uitdehaag Joost CM
author_sort Zaman Guido JR
title A theoretical entropy score as a single value to express inhibitor selectivity
title_short A theoretical entropy score as a single value to express inhibitor selectivity
title_full A theoretical entropy score as a single value to express inhibitor selectivity
title_fullStr A theoretical entropy score as a single value to express inhibitor selectivity
title_full_unstemmed A theoretical entropy score as a single value to express inhibitor selectivity
title_sort theoretical entropy score as a single value to express inhibitor selectivity
publisher BMC
series BMC Bioinformatics
issn 1471-2105
publishDate 2011-04-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Designing maximally selective ligands that act on individual targets is the dominant paradigm in drug discovery. Poor selectivity can underlie toxicity and side effects in the clinic, and for this reason compound selectivity is increasingly monitored from very early on in the drug discovery process. To make sense of large amounts of profiling data, and to determine when a compound is sufficiently selective, there is a need for a proper quantitative measure of selectivity.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Here we propose a new theoretical entropy score that can be calculated from a set of IC<sub>50 </sub>data. In contrast to previous measures such as the 'selectivity score', Gini score, or partition index, the entropy score is non-arbitary, fully exploits IC<sub>50 </sub>data, and is not dependent on a reference enzyme. In addition, the entropy score gives the most robust values with data from different sources, because it is less sensitive to errors. We apply the new score to kinase and nuclear receptor profiling data, and to high-throughput screening data. In addition, through analyzing profiles of clinical compounds, we show quantitatively that a more selective kinase inhibitor is not necessarily more drug-like.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>For quantifying selectivity from panel profiling, a theoretical entropy score is the best method. It is valuable for studying the molecular mechanisms of selectivity, and to steer compound progression in drug discovery programs.</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/12/94
work_keys_str_mv AT zamanguidojr atheoreticalentropyscoreasasinglevaluetoexpressinhibitorselectivity
AT uitdehaagjoostcm atheoreticalentropyscoreasasinglevaluetoexpressinhibitorselectivity
AT zamanguidojr theoreticalentropyscoreasasinglevaluetoexpressinhibitorselectivity
AT uitdehaagjoostcm theoreticalentropyscoreasasinglevaluetoexpressinhibitorselectivity
_version_ 1725058643279216640