Modeling Maintenance of Long-Term Potentiation in Clustered Synapses: Long-Term Memory without Bistability

Memories are stored, at least partly, as patterns of strong synapses. Given molecular turnover, how can synapses maintain strong for the years that memories can persist? Some models postulate that biochemical bistability maintains strong synapses. However, bistability should give a bimodal distribut...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Paul Smolen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2015-01-01
Series:Neural Plasticity
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/185410
id doaj-94e369a39e7a465bbb3d866839a7d1a0
record_format Article
spelling doaj-94e369a39e7a465bbb3d866839a7d1a02020-11-25T00:19:23ZengHindawi LimitedNeural Plasticity2090-59041687-54432015-01-01201510.1155/2015/185410185410Modeling Maintenance of Long-Term Potentiation in Clustered Synapses: Long-Term Memory without BistabilityPaul Smolen0Laboratory of Origin, Department of Neurobiology and Anatomy, W. M. Keck Center for the Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, The University of Texas Medical School at Houston, Houston, TX 77030, USAMemories are stored, at least partly, as patterns of strong synapses. Given molecular turnover, how can synapses maintain strong for the years that memories can persist? Some models postulate that biochemical bistability maintains strong synapses. However, bistability should give a bimodal distribution of synaptic strength or weight, whereas current data show unimodal distributions for weights and for a correlated variable, dendritic spine volume. Thus it is important for models to simulate both unimodal distributions and long-term memory persistence. Here a model is developed that connects ongoing, competing processes of synaptic growth and weakening to stochastic processes of receptor insertion and removal in dendritic spines. The model simulates long-term (>1 yr) persistence of groups of strong synapses. A unimodal weight distribution results. For stability of this distribution it proved essential to incorporate resource competition between synapses organized into small clusters. With competition, these clusters are stable for years. These simulations concur with recent data to support the “clustered plasticity hypothesis” which suggests clusters, rather than single synaptic contacts, may be a fundamental unit for storage of long-term memory. The model makes empirical predictions and may provide a framework to investigate mechanisms maintaining the balance between synaptic plasticity and stability of memory.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/185410
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Paul Smolen
spellingShingle Paul Smolen
Modeling Maintenance of Long-Term Potentiation in Clustered Synapses: Long-Term Memory without Bistability
Neural Plasticity
author_facet Paul Smolen
author_sort Paul Smolen
title Modeling Maintenance of Long-Term Potentiation in Clustered Synapses: Long-Term Memory without Bistability
title_short Modeling Maintenance of Long-Term Potentiation in Clustered Synapses: Long-Term Memory without Bistability
title_full Modeling Maintenance of Long-Term Potentiation in Clustered Synapses: Long-Term Memory without Bistability
title_fullStr Modeling Maintenance of Long-Term Potentiation in Clustered Synapses: Long-Term Memory without Bistability
title_full_unstemmed Modeling Maintenance of Long-Term Potentiation in Clustered Synapses: Long-Term Memory without Bistability
title_sort modeling maintenance of long-term potentiation in clustered synapses: long-term memory without bistability
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Neural Plasticity
issn 2090-5904
1687-5443
publishDate 2015-01-01
description Memories are stored, at least partly, as patterns of strong synapses. Given molecular turnover, how can synapses maintain strong for the years that memories can persist? Some models postulate that biochemical bistability maintains strong synapses. However, bistability should give a bimodal distribution of synaptic strength or weight, whereas current data show unimodal distributions for weights and for a correlated variable, dendritic spine volume. Thus it is important for models to simulate both unimodal distributions and long-term memory persistence. Here a model is developed that connects ongoing, competing processes of synaptic growth and weakening to stochastic processes of receptor insertion and removal in dendritic spines. The model simulates long-term (>1 yr) persistence of groups of strong synapses. A unimodal weight distribution results. For stability of this distribution it proved essential to incorporate resource competition between synapses organized into small clusters. With competition, these clusters are stable for years. These simulations concur with recent data to support the “clustered plasticity hypothesis” which suggests clusters, rather than single synaptic contacts, may be a fundamental unit for storage of long-term memory. The model makes empirical predictions and may provide a framework to investigate mechanisms maintaining the balance between synaptic plasticity and stability of memory.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/185410
work_keys_str_mv AT paulsmolen modelingmaintenanceoflongtermpotentiationinclusteredsynapseslongtermmemorywithoutbistability
_version_ 1725371693103316992