The Epistemic Value of Deep Disagreements

In the epistemology of disagreement literature an underdeveloped argument defending the claim that an agent need not conciliate when she becomes aware of epistemic peer disagreement is based on the idea that there are epistemic benefits to be gained from disagreement. Such benefits are unobtainable...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kirk Lougheed
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Windsor 2018-06-01
Series:Informal Logic
Subjects:
Online Access:https://informallogic.ca/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/4966