Testing the Effectiveness of a Short-Term Stress Prevention Programme in Primary School Students
The present study tested the effectiveness of a four-week, school-based, universal cognitive-behavioural stress prevention programme. The prevention programme included short daily exercises which were adopted from two well-validated anti stress trainings. The daily exercises took approximately 10−15...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Ubiquity Press
2018-07-01
|
Series: | Health Psychology Bulletin |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.healthpsychologybulletin.com/articles/11 |
id |
doaj-90d2930ff5b748d2a4e45bcd8ce244a6 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-90d2930ff5b748d2a4e45bcd8ce244a62020-11-25T02:39:32ZengUbiquity PressHealth Psychology Bulletin2398-59412018-07-012110.5334/hpb.113Testing the Effectiveness of a Short-Term Stress Prevention Programme in Primary School StudentsChris Englert0Aline Bechler1Sarah Singh2Alex Bertrams3University of BernUniversity of BernUniversity of BernUniversity of BernThe present study tested the effectiveness of a four-week, school-based, universal cognitive-behavioural stress prevention programme. The prevention programme included short daily exercises which were adopted from two well-validated anti stress trainings. The daily exercises took approximately 10−15 minutes on average and were performed during regular classroom sessions. Half of the classes were randomly assigned to the prevention group ('n' = 80), while the other half were sorted into the non-treatment control group, which did not take part in the stress prevention programme ('n' = 73). The students’ physical and psychological stress-related symptoms were assessed five times (i.e., prior to the training and after each week of training). Their coping strategies, self-efficacy and self-control were also measured. It was hypothesized that in the prevention group students’ physical and psychological stress-related symptoms would significantly decrease over time, compared to the non-treatment control group. Contrary to our predictions, the prevention programme did not lead to statistically significant changes in physical or psychological stress-related symptoms. The students’ coping strategies, self-efficacy and self-control did not have an influence on the result patterns. The results indicate that short-term stress prevention programmes may not be as effective as long-term programmes.https://www.healthpsychologybulletin.com/articles/11preventionschoolself-controlself-efficacystress |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Chris Englert Aline Bechler Sarah Singh Alex Bertrams |
spellingShingle |
Chris Englert Aline Bechler Sarah Singh Alex Bertrams Testing the Effectiveness of a Short-Term Stress Prevention Programme in Primary School Students Health Psychology Bulletin prevention school self-control self-efficacy stress |
author_facet |
Chris Englert Aline Bechler Sarah Singh Alex Bertrams |
author_sort |
Chris Englert |
title |
Testing the Effectiveness of a Short-Term Stress Prevention Programme in Primary School Students |
title_short |
Testing the Effectiveness of a Short-Term Stress Prevention Programme in Primary School Students |
title_full |
Testing the Effectiveness of a Short-Term Stress Prevention Programme in Primary School Students |
title_fullStr |
Testing the Effectiveness of a Short-Term Stress Prevention Programme in Primary School Students |
title_full_unstemmed |
Testing the Effectiveness of a Short-Term Stress Prevention Programme in Primary School Students |
title_sort |
testing the effectiveness of a short-term stress prevention programme in primary school students |
publisher |
Ubiquity Press |
series |
Health Psychology Bulletin |
issn |
2398-5941 |
publishDate |
2018-07-01 |
description |
The present study tested the effectiveness of a four-week, school-based, universal cognitive-behavioural stress prevention programme. The prevention programme included short daily exercises which were adopted from two well-validated anti stress trainings. The daily exercises took approximately 10−15 minutes on average and were performed during regular classroom sessions. Half of the classes were randomly assigned to the prevention group ('n' = 80), while the other half were sorted into the non-treatment control group, which did not take part in the stress prevention programme ('n' = 73). The students’ physical and psychological stress-related symptoms were assessed five times (i.e., prior to the training and after each week of training). Their coping strategies, self-efficacy and self-control were also measured. It was hypothesized that in the prevention group students’ physical and psychological stress-related symptoms would significantly decrease over time, compared to the non-treatment control group. Contrary to our predictions, the prevention programme did not lead to statistically significant changes in physical or psychological stress-related symptoms. The students’ coping strategies, self-efficacy and self-control did not have an influence on the result patterns. The results indicate that short-term stress prevention programmes may not be as effective as long-term programmes. |
topic |
prevention school self-control self-efficacy stress |
url |
https://www.healthpsychologybulletin.com/articles/11 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT chrisenglert testingtheeffectivenessofashorttermstresspreventionprogrammeinprimaryschoolstudents AT alinebechler testingtheeffectivenessofashorttermstresspreventionprogrammeinprimaryschoolstudents AT sarahsingh testingtheeffectivenessofashorttermstresspreventionprogrammeinprimaryschoolstudents AT alexbertrams testingtheeffectivenessofashorttermstresspreventionprogrammeinprimaryschoolstudents |
_version_ |
1724785595246444544 |