Testing the Effectiveness of a Short-Term Stress Prevention Programme in Primary School Students

The present study tested the effectiveness of a four-week, school-based, universal cognitive-behavioural stress prevention programme. The prevention programme included short daily exercises which were adopted from two well-validated anti stress trainings. The daily exercises took approximately 10−15...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chris Englert, Aline Bechler, Sarah Singh, Alex Bertrams
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Ubiquity Press 2018-07-01
Series:Health Psychology Bulletin
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.healthpsychologybulletin.com/articles/11
id doaj-90d2930ff5b748d2a4e45bcd8ce244a6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-90d2930ff5b748d2a4e45bcd8ce244a62020-11-25T02:39:32ZengUbiquity PressHealth Psychology Bulletin2398-59412018-07-012110.5334/hpb.113Testing the Effectiveness of a Short-Term Stress Prevention Programme in Primary School StudentsChris Englert0Aline Bechler1Sarah Singh2Alex Bertrams3University of BernUniversity of BernUniversity of BernUniversity of BernThe present study tested the effectiveness of a four-week, school-based, universal cognitive-behavioural stress prevention programme. The prevention programme included short daily exercises which were adopted from two well-validated anti stress trainings. The daily exercises took approximately 10−15 minutes on average and were performed during regular classroom sessions. Half of the classes were randomly assigned to the prevention group ('n' = 80), while the other half were sorted into the non-treatment control group, which did not take part in the stress prevention programme ('n' = 73). The students’ physical and psychological stress-related symptoms were assessed five times (i.e., prior to the training and after each week of training). Their coping strategies, self-efficacy and self-control were also measured. It was hypothesized that in the prevention group students’ physical and psychological stress-related symptoms would significantly decrease over time, compared to the non-treatment control group. Contrary to our predictions, the prevention programme did not lead to statistically significant changes in physical or psychological stress-related symptoms. The students’ coping strategies, self-efficacy and self-control did not have an influence on the result patterns. The results indicate that short-term stress prevention programmes may not be as effective as long-term programmes.https://www.healthpsychologybulletin.com/articles/11preventionschoolself-controlself-efficacystress
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Chris Englert
Aline Bechler
Sarah Singh
Alex Bertrams
spellingShingle Chris Englert
Aline Bechler
Sarah Singh
Alex Bertrams
Testing the Effectiveness of a Short-Term Stress Prevention Programme in Primary School Students
Health Psychology Bulletin
prevention
school
self-control
self-efficacy
stress
author_facet Chris Englert
Aline Bechler
Sarah Singh
Alex Bertrams
author_sort Chris Englert
title Testing the Effectiveness of a Short-Term Stress Prevention Programme in Primary School Students
title_short Testing the Effectiveness of a Short-Term Stress Prevention Programme in Primary School Students
title_full Testing the Effectiveness of a Short-Term Stress Prevention Programme in Primary School Students
title_fullStr Testing the Effectiveness of a Short-Term Stress Prevention Programme in Primary School Students
title_full_unstemmed Testing the Effectiveness of a Short-Term Stress Prevention Programme in Primary School Students
title_sort testing the effectiveness of a short-term stress prevention programme in primary school students
publisher Ubiquity Press
series Health Psychology Bulletin
issn 2398-5941
publishDate 2018-07-01
description The present study tested the effectiveness of a four-week, school-based, universal cognitive-behavioural stress prevention programme. The prevention programme included short daily exercises which were adopted from two well-validated anti stress trainings. The daily exercises took approximately 10−15 minutes on average and were performed during regular classroom sessions. Half of the classes were randomly assigned to the prevention group ('n' = 80), while the other half were sorted into the non-treatment control group, which did not take part in the stress prevention programme ('n' = 73). The students’ physical and psychological stress-related symptoms were assessed five times (i.e., prior to the training and after each week of training). Their coping strategies, self-efficacy and self-control were also measured. It was hypothesized that in the prevention group students’ physical and psychological stress-related symptoms would significantly decrease over time, compared to the non-treatment control group. Contrary to our predictions, the prevention programme did not lead to statistically significant changes in physical or psychological stress-related symptoms. The students’ coping strategies, self-efficacy and self-control did not have an influence on the result patterns. The results indicate that short-term stress prevention programmes may not be as effective as long-term programmes.
topic prevention
school
self-control
self-efficacy
stress
url https://www.healthpsychologybulletin.com/articles/11
work_keys_str_mv AT chrisenglert testingtheeffectivenessofashorttermstresspreventionprogrammeinprimaryschoolstudents
AT alinebechler testingtheeffectivenessofashorttermstresspreventionprogrammeinprimaryschoolstudents
AT sarahsingh testingtheeffectivenessofashorttermstresspreventionprogrammeinprimaryschoolstudents
AT alexbertrams testingtheeffectivenessofashorttermstresspreventionprogrammeinprimaryschoolstudents
_version_ 1724785595246444544