The in vitro direct mycobacterial growth inhibition assay (MGIA) for the early evaluation of TB vaccine candidates and assessment of protective immunity: a protocol for non-human primate cells [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]
The only currently available approach to early efficacy testing of tuberculosis (TB) vaccine candidates is in vivo preclinical challenge models. These typically include mice, guinea pigs and non-human primates (NHPs), which must be exposed to virulent M.tb in a ‘challenge’ experiment following vacci...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
F1000 Research Ltd
2021-03-01
|
Series: | F1000Research |
Online Access: | https://f1000research.com/articles/10-257/v1 |
id |
doaj-8d457b8383a642419000e0f51934d0e4 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-8d457b8383a642419000e0f51934d0e42021-05-11T12:23:35ZengF1000 Research LtdF1000Research2046-14022021-03-011010.12688/f1000research.51640.154829The in vitro direct mycobacterial growth inhibition assay (MGIA) for the early evaluation of TB vaccine candidates and assessment of protective immunity: a protocol for non-human primate cells [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]Rachel Tanner0Emily Hoogkamer1Julia Bitencourt2Andrew White3Charelle Boot4Claudia C. Sombroek5Stephanie A. Harris6Matthew K. O'Shea7Daniel Wright8Rachel Wittenberg9Charlotte Sarfas10Iman Satti11Frank A.W. Verreck12Sally A. Sharpe13Helen A. Fletcher14Helen McShane15Nuffield Department of Medicine, The Jenner Institute, Oxford, OX3 7DQ, UKNuffield Department of Medicine, The Jenner Institute, Oxford, OX3 7DQ, UKGonҫalo Moniz Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (FIOCRUZ), Salvador, 40296-710, BrazilPublic Health England, Salisbury, SP4 0JG, UKDepartment of Parasitology, Biomedical Primate Research Centre, Rijswijk, 2288 GJ, The NetherlandsDepartment of Parasitology, Biomedical Primate Research Centre, Rijswijk, 2288 GJ, The NetherlandsNuffield Department of Medicine, The Jenner Institute, Oxford, OX3 7DQ, UKNuffield Department of Medicine, The Jenner Institute, Oxford, OX3 7DQ, UKNuffield Department of Medicine, The Jenner Institute, Oxford, OX3 7DQ, UKNuffield Department of Medicine, The Jenner Institute, Oxford, OX3 7DQ, UKPublic Health England, Salisbury, SP4 0JG, UKNuffield Department of Medicine, The Jenner Institute, Oxford, OX3 7DQ, UKDepartment of Parasitology, Biomedical Primate Research Centre, Rijswijk, 2288 GJ, The NetherlandsPublic Health England, Salisbury, SP4 0JG, UKLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, WC1E 7HT, UKNuffield Department of Medicine, The Jenner Institute, Oxford, OX3 7DQ, UKThe only currently available approach to early efficacy testing of tuberculosis (TB) vaccine candidates is in vivo preclinical challenge models. These typically include mice, guinea pigs and non-human primates (NHPs), which must be exposed to virulent M.tb in a ‘challenge’ experiment following vaccination in order to evaluate protective efficacy. This procedure results in disease development and is classified as ‘Moderate’ in severity under EU legislation and UK ASPA licensure. Furthermore, experiments are relatively long and animals must be maintained in high containment level facilities, making them relatively costly. We describe an in vitro protocol for the direct mycobacterial growth inhibition assay (MGIA) for use in the macaque model of TB vaccine development with the aim of overcoming some of these limitations. Importantly, using an in vitro assay in place of in vivo M.tb challenge represents a significant refinement to the existing procedure for early vaccine efficacy testing. Peripheral blood mononuclear cell and autologous serum samples collected from vaccinated and unvaccinated control animals are co-cultured with mycobacteria in a 48-well plate format for 96 hours. Adherent monocytes are then lysed to release intracellular mycobacteria which is quantified using the BACTEC MGIT system and colony-forming units determined relative to an inoculum control and stock standard curve. We discuss related optimisation and characterisation experiments, and review evidence that the direct NHP MGIA provides a biologically relevant model of vaccine-induced protection. The potential end-users of the NHP MGIA are academic and industry organisations that conduct the assessment of TB vaccine candidates and associated protective immunity using the NHP model. This approach aims to provide a method for high-throughput down-selection of vaccine candidates going forward to in vivo efficacy testing, thus expediting the development of a more efficacious TB vaccine and offering potential refinement and reduction to the use of NHPs for this purpose.https://f1000research.com/articles/10-257/v1 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Rachel Tanner Emily Hoogkamer Julia Bitencourt Andrew White Charelle Boot Claudia C. Sombroek Stephanie A. Harris Matthew K. O'Shea Daniel Wright Rachel Wittenberg Charlotte Sarfas Iman Satti Frank A.W. Verreck Sally A. Sharpe Helen A. Fletcher Helen McShane |
spellingShingle |
Rachel Tanner Emily Hoogkamer Julia Bitencourt Andrew White Charelle Boot Claudia C. Sombroek Stephanie A. Harris Matthew K. O'Shea Daniel Wright Rachel Wittenberg Charlotte Sarfas Iman Satti Frank A.W. Verreck Sally A. Sharpe Helen A. Fletcher Helen McShane The in vitro direct mycobacterial growth inhibition assay (MGIA) for the early evaluation of TB vaccine candidates and assessment of protective immunity: a protocol for non-human primate cells [version 1; peer review: 2 approved] F1000Research |
author_facet |
Rachel Tanner Emily Hoogkamer Julia Bitencourt Andrew White Charelle Boot Claudia C. Sombroek Stephanie A. Harris Matthew K. O'Shea Daniel Wright Rachel Wittenberg Charlotte Sarfas Iman Satti Frank A.W. Verreck Sally A. Sharpe Helen A. Fletcher Helen McShane |
author_sort |
Rachel Tanner |
title |
The in vitro direct mycobacterial growth inhibition assay (MGIA) for the early evaluation of TB vaccine candidates and assessment of protective immunity: a protocol for non-human primate cells [version 1; peer review: 2 approved] |
title_short |
The in vitro direct mycobacterial growth inhibition assay (MGIA) for the early evaluation of TB vaccine candidates and assessment of protective immunity: a protocol for non-human primate cells [version 1; peer review: 2 approved] |
title_full |
The in vitro direct mycobacterial growth inhibition assay (MGIA) for the early evaluation of TB vaccine candidates and assessment of protective immunity: a protocol for non-human primate cells [version 1; peer review: 2 approved] |
title_fullStr |
The in vitro direct mycobacterial growth inhibition assay (MGIA) for the early evaluation of TB vaccine candidates and assessment of protective immunity: a protocol for non-human primate cells [version 1; peer review: 2 approved] |
title_full_unstemmed |
The in vitro direct mycobacterial growth inhibition assay (MGIA) for the early evaluation of TB vaccine candidates and assessment of protective immunity: a protocol for non-human primate cells [version 1; peer review: 2 approved] |
title_sort |
in vitro direct mycobacterial growth inhibition assay (mgia) for the early evaluation of tb vaccine candidates and assessment of protective immunity: a protocol for non-human primate cells [version 1; peer review: 2 approved] |
publisher |
F1000 Research Ltd |
series |
F1000Research |
issn |
2046-1402 |
publishDate |
2021-03-01 |
description |
The only currently available approach to early efficacy testing of tuberculosis (TB) vaccine candidates is in vivo preclinical challenge models. These typically include mice, guinea pigs and non-human primates (NHPs), which must be exposed to virulent M.tb in a ‘challenge’ experiment following vaccination in order to evaluate protective efficacy. This procedure results in disease development and is classified as ‘Moderate’ in severity under EU legislation and UK ASPA licensure. Furthermore, experiments are relatively long and animals must be maintained in high containment level facilities, making them relatively costly. We describe an in vitro protocol for the direct mycobacterial growth inhibition assay (MGIA) for use in the macaque model of TB vaccine development with the aim of overcoming some of these limitations. Importantly, using an in vitro assay in place of in vivo M.tb challenge represents a significant refinement to the existing procedure for early vaccine efficacy testing. Peripheral blood mononuclear cell and autologous serum samples collected from vaccinated and unvaccinated control animals are co-cultured with mycobacteria in a 48-well plate format for 96 hours. Adherent monocytes are then lysed to release intracellular mycobacteria which is quantified using the BACTEC MGIT system and colony-forming units determined relative to an inoculum control and stock standard curve. We discuss related optimisation and characterisation experiments, and review evidence that the direct NHP MGIA provides a biologically relevant model of vaccine-induced protection. The potential end-users of the NHP MGIA are academic and industry organisations that conduct the assessment of TB vaccine candidates and associated protective immunity using the NHP model. This approach aims to provide a method for high-throughput down-selection of vaccine candidates going forward to in vivo efficacy testing, thus expediting the development of a more efficacious TB vaccine and offering potential refinement and reduction to the use of NHPs for this purpose. |
url |
https://f1000research.com/articles/10-257/v1 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT racheltanner theinvitrodirectmycobacterialgrowthinhibitionassaymgiafortheearlyevaluationoftbvaccinecandidatesandassessmentofprotectiveimmunityaprotocolfornonhumanprimatecellsversion1peerreview2approved AT emilyhoogkamer theinvitrodirectmycobacterialgrowthinhibitionassaymgiafortheearlyevaluationoftbvaccinecandidatesandassessmentofprotectiveimmunityaprotocolfornonhumanprimatecellsversion1peerreview2approved AT juliabitencourt theinvitrodirectmycobacterialgrowthinhibitionassaymgiafortheearlyevaluationoftbvaccinecandidatesandassessmentofprotectiveimmunityaprotocolfornonhumanprimatecellsversion1peerreview2approved AT andrewwhite theinvitrodirectmycobacterialgrowthinhibitionassaymgiafortheearlyevaluationoftbvaccinecandidatesandassessmentofprotectiveimmunityaprotocolfornonhumanprimatecellsversion1peerreview2approved AT charelleboot theinvitrodirectmycobacterialgrowthinhibitionassaymgiafortheearlyevaluationoftbvaccinecandidatesandassessmentofprotectiveimmunityaprotocolfornonhumanprimatecellsversion1peerreview2approved AT claudiacsombroek theinvitrodirectmycobacterialgrowthinhibitionassaymgiafortheearlyevaluationoftbvaccinecandidatesandassessmentofprotectiveimmunityaprotocolfornonhumanprimatecellsversion1peerreview2approved AT stephanieaharris theinvitrodirectmycobacterialgrowthinhibitionassaymgiafortheearlyevaluationoftbvaccinecandidatesandassessmentofprotectiveimmunityaprotocolfornonhumanprimatecellsversion1peerreview2approved AT matthewkoshea theinvitrodirectmycobacterialgrowthinhibitionassaymgiafortheearlyevaluationoftbvaccinecandidatesandassessmentofprotectiveimmunityaprotocolfornonhumanprimatecellsversion1peerreview2approved AT danielwright theinvitrodirectmycobacterialgrowthinhibitionassaymgiafortheearlyevaluationoftbvaccinecandidatesandassessmentofprotectiveimmunityaprotocolfornonhumanprimatecellsversion1peerreview2approved AT rachelwittenberg theinvitrodirectmycobacterialgrowthinhibitionassaymgiafortheearlyevaluationoftbvaccinecandidatesandassessmentofprotectiveimmunityaprotocolfornonhumanprimatecellsversion1peerreview2approved AT charlottesarfas theinvitrodirectmycobacterialgrowthinhibitionassaymgiafortheearlyevaluationoftbvaccinecandidatesandassessmentofprotectiveimmunityaprotocolfornonhumanprimatecellsversion1peerreview2approved AT imansatti theinvitrodirectmycobacterialgrowthinhibitionassaymgiafortheearlyevaluationoftbvaccinecandidatesandassessmentofprotectiveimmunityaprotocolfornonhumanprimatecellsversion1peerreview2approved AT frankawverreck theinvitrodirectmycobacterialgrowthinhibitionassaymgiafortheearlyevaluationoftbvaccinecandidatesandassessmentofprotectiveimmunityaprotocolfornonhumanprimatecellsversion1peerreview2approved AT sallyasharpe theinvitrodirectmycobacterialgrowthinhibitionassaymgiafortheearlyevaluationoftbvaccinecandidatesandassessmentofprotectiveimmunityaprotocolfornonhumanprimatecellsversion1peerreview2approved AT helenafletcher theinvitrodirectmycobacterialgrowthinhibitionassaymgiafortheearlyevaluationoftbvaccinecandidatesandassessmentofprotectiveimmunityaprotocolfornonhumanprimatecellsversion1peerreview2approved AT helenmcshane theinvitrodirectmycobacterialgrowthinhibitionassaymgiafortheearlyevaluationoftbvaccinecandidatesandassessmentofprotectiveimmunityaprotocolfornonhumanprimatecellsversion1peerreview2approved AT racheltanner invitrodirectmycobacterialgrowthinhibitionassaymgiafortheearlyevaluationoftbvaccinecandidatesandassessmentofprotectiveimmunityaprotocolfornonhumanprimatecellsversion1peerreview2approved AT emilyhoogkamer invitrodirectmycobacterialgrowthinhibitionassaymgiafortheearlyevaluationoftbvaccinecandidatesandassessmentofprotectiveimmunityaprotocolfornonhumanprimatecellsversion1peerreview2approved AT juliabitencourt invitrodirectmycobacterialgrowthinhibitionassaymgiafortheearlyevaluationoftbvaccinecandidatesandassessmentofprotectiveimmunityaprotocolfornonhumanprimatecellsversion1peerreview2approved AT andrewwhite invitrodirectmycobacterialgrowthinhibitionassaymgiafortheearlyevaluationoftbvaccinecandidatesandassessmentofprotectiveimmunityaprotocolfornonhumanprimatecellsversion1peerreview2approved AT charelleboot invitrodirectmycobacterialgrowthinhibitionassaymgiafortheearlyevaluationoftbvaccinecandidatesandassessmentofprotectiveimmunityaprotocolfornonhumanprimatecellsversion1peerreview2approved AT claudiacsombroek invitrodirectmycobacterialgrowthinhibitionassaymgiafortheearlyevaluationoftbvaccinecandidatesandassessmentofprotectiveimmunityaprotocolfornonhumanprimatecellsversion1peerreview2approved AT stephanieaharris invitrodirectmycobacterialgrowthinhibitionassaymgiafortheearlyevaluationoftbvaccinecandidatesandassessmentofprotectiveimmunityaprotocolfornonhumanprimatecellsversion1peerreview2approved AT matthewkoshea invitrodirectmycobacterialgrowthinhibitionassaymgiafortheearlyevaluationoftbvaccinecandidatesandassessmentofprotectiveimmunityaprotocolfornonhumanprimatecellsversion1peerreview2approved AT danielwright invitrodirectmycobacterialgrowthinhibitionassaymgiafortheearlyevaluationoftbvaccinecandidatesandassessmentofprotectiveimmunityaprotocolfornonhumanprimatecellsversion1peerreview2approved AT rachelwittenberg invitrodirectmycobacterialgrowthinhibitionassaymgiafortheearlyevaluationoftbvaccinecandidatesandassessmentofprotectiveimmunityaprotocolfornonhumanprimatecellsversion1peerreview2approved AT charlottesarfas invitrodirectmycobacterialgrowthinhibitionassaymgiafortheearlyevaluationoftbvaccinecandidatesandassessmentofprotectiveimmunityaprotocolfornonhumanprimatecellsversion1peerreview2approved AT imansatti invitrodirectmycobacterialgrowthinhibitionassaymgiafortheearlyevaluationoftbvaccinecandidatesandassessmentofprotectiveimmunityaprotocolfornonhumanprimatecellsversion1peerreview2approved AT frankawverreck invitrodirectmycobacterialgrowthinhibitionassaymgiafortheearlyevaluationoftbvaccinecandidatesandassessmentofprotectiveimmunityaprotocolfornonhumanprimatecellsversion1peerreview2approved AT sallyasharpe invitrodirectmycobacterialgrowthinhibitionassaymgiafortheearlyevaluationoftbvaccinecandidatesandassessmentofprotectiveimmunityaprotocolfornonhumanprimatecellsversion1peerreview2approved AT helenafletcher invitrodirectmycobacterialgrowthinhibitionassaymgiafortheearlyevaluationoftbvaccinecandidatesandassessmentofprotectiveimmunityaprotocolfornonhumanprimatecellsversion1peerreview2approved AT helenmcshane invitrodirectmycobacterialgrowthinhibitionassaymgiafortheearlyevaluationoftbvaccinecandidatesandassessmentofprotectiveimmunityaprotocolfornonhumanprimatecellsversion1peerreview2approved |
_version_ |
1721444943339192320 |