Sensory and physicochemical evaluation of acerola nectar sweetened with sucrose and different sweeteners
This paper aims to evaluate the physicochemical characteristics, sensory acceptance, and purchase intent of acerola nectar sweetened with sucrose and other sweeteners (neotame, sucralose and stevia extracts with 40%, 60%, 80%, and 95% rebaudioside A). The analyses were carried out for pH, soluble so...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos
2013-12-01
|
Series: | Food Science and Technology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-20612013000400003&lng=en&tlng=en |
id |
doaj-8c6b489f44074e51b71be823d935e280 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-8c6b489f44074e51b71be823d935e2802020-11-24T23:00:52ZengSociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de AlimentosFood Science and Technology1678-457X2013-12-0133461261810.1590/S0101-20612013000400003S0101-20612013000400003Sensory and physicochemical evaluation of acerola nectar sweetened with sucrose and different sweetenersMariana Borges de Lima Dutra0Helena Maria André Bolini1Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia Triângulo MineiroUniversidade Estadual de CampinasThis paper aims to evaluate the physicochemical characteristics, sensory acceptance, and purchase intent of acerola nectar sweetened with sucrose and other sweeteners (neotame, sucralose and stevia extracts with 40%, 60%, 80%, and 95% rebaudioside A). The analyses were carried out for pH, soluble solids, total titratable acidity, ascorbic acid, and colorimetry (L*a*b). The acceptance test was performed by 120 consumers who evaluated the appearance, aroma, flavor, texture, and overall impression of the samples using a 9-cm unstructured hedonic scale. Furthermore, the consumers were asked to rate overall purchase intent along the scale anchored with (1) "would definitely not purchase" to (5) "would definitely purchase." The results were evaluated using analysis of variance/Tukey test and the internal preference mapping technique. The acerola nectar samples did not differ significantly (p>0.05) between themselves in terms of vitamin C content and total titratable acidity. As for appearance and aroma, there was no significant difference (p>0.05) between the samples, and as for flavor and overall impression, the most accepted samples were those with sucrose and sucralose. The internal preference mapping indicated that the most accepted samples were those with sucrose, sucralose, and neotame were. The highest frequency of positive purchase intent scores was observed for sucrose and sucralose.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-20612013000400003&lng=en&tlng=enStevia rebaudianasucraloseneotameMalpighia emarginata DC |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Mariana Borges de Lima Dutra Helena Maria André Bolini |
spellingShingle |
Mariana Borges de Lima Dutra Helena Maria André Bolini Sensory and physicochemical evaluation of acerola nectar sweetened with sucrose and different sweeteners Food Science and Technology Stevia rebaudiana sucralose neotame Malpighia emarginata DC |
author_facet |
Mariana Borges de Lima Dutra Helena Maria André Bolini |
author_sort |
Mariana Borges de Lima Dutra |
title |
Sensory and physicochemical evaluation of acerola nectar sweetened with sucrose and different sweeteners |
title_short |
Sensory and physicochemical evaluation of acerola nectar sweetened with sucrose and different sweeteners |
title_full |
Sensory and physicochemical evaluation of acerola nectar sweetened with sucrose and different sweeteners |
title_fullStr |
Sensory and physicochemical evaluation of acerola nectar sweetened with sucrose and different sweeteners |
title_full_unstemmed |
Sensory and physicochemical evaluation of acerola nectar sweetened with sucrose and different sweeteners |
title_sort |
sensory and physicochemical evaluation of acerola nectar sweetened with sucrose and different sweeteners |
publisher |
Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos |
series |
Food Science and Technology |
issn |
1678-457X |
publishDate |
2013-12-01 |
description |
This paper aims to evaluate the physicochemical characteristics, sensory acceptance, and purchase intent of acerola nectar sweetened with sucrose and other sweeteners (neotame, sucralose and stevia extracts with 40%, 60%, 80%, and 95% rebaudioside A). The analyses were carried out for pH, soluble solids, total titratable acidity, ascorbic acid, and colorimetry (L*a*b). The acceptance test was performed by 120 consumers who evaluated the appearance, aroma, flavor, texture, and overall impression of the samples using a 9-cm unstructured hedonic scale. Furthermore, the consumers were asked to rate overall purchase intent along the scale anchored with (1) "would definitely not purchase" to (5) "would definitely purchase." The results were evaluated using analysis of variance/Tukey test and the internal preference mapping technique. The acerola nectar samples did not differ significantly (p>0.05) between themselves in terms of vitamin C content and total titratable acidity. As for appearance and aroma, there was no significant difference (p>0.05) between the samples, and as for flavor and overall impression, the most accepted samples were those with sucrose and sucralose. The internal preference mapping indicated that the most accepted samples were those with sucrose, sucralose, and neotame were. The highest frequency of positive purchase intent scores was observed for sucrose and sucralose. |
topic |
Stevia rebaudiana sucralose neotame Malpighia emarginata DC |
url |
http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-20612013000400003&lng=en&tlng=en |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT marianaborgesdelimadutra sensoryandphysicochemicalevaluationofacerolanectarsweetenedwithsucroseanddifferentsweeteners AT helenamariaandrebolini sensoryandphysicochemicalevaluationofacerolanectarsweetenedwithsucroseanddifferentsweeteners |
_version_ |
1725641040823582720 |