Sensory and physicochemical evaluation of acerola nectar sweetened with sucrose and different sweeteners

This paper aims to evaluate the physicochemical characteristics, sensory acceptance, and purchase intent of acerola nectar sweetened with sucrose and other sweeteners (neotame, sucralose and stevia extracts with 40%, 60%, 80%, and 95% rebaudioside A). The analyses were carried out for pH, soluble so...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mariana Borges de Lima Dutra, Helena Maria André Bolini
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos 2013-12-01
Series:Food Science and Technology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-20612013000400003&lng=en&tlng=en
id doaj-8c6b489f44074e51b71be823d935e280
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8c6b489f44074e51b71be823d935e2802020-11-24T23:00:52ZengSociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de AlimentosFood Science and Technology1678-457X2013-12-0133461261810.1590/S0101-20612013000400003S0101-20612013000400003Sensory and physicochemical evaluation of acerola nectar sweetened with sucrose and different sweetenersMariana Borges de Lima Dutra0Helena Maria André Bolini1Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia Triângulo MineiroUniversidade Estadual de CampinasThis paper aims to evaluate the physicochemical characteristics, sensory acceptance, and purchase intent of acerola nectar sweetened with sucrose and other sweeteners (neotame, sucralose and stevia extracts with 40%, 60%, 80%, and 95% rebaudioside A). The analyses were carried out for pH, soluble solids, total titratable acidity, ascorbic acid, and colorimetry (L*a*b). The acceptance test was performed by 120 consumers who evaluated the appearance, aroma, flavor, texture, and overall impression of the samples using a 9-cm unstructured hedonic scale. Furthermore, the consumers were asked to rate overall purchase intent along the scale anchored with (1) "would definitely not purchase" to (5) "would definitely purchase." The results were evaluated using analysis of variance/Tukey test and the internal preference mapping technique. The acerola nectar samples did not differ significantly (p>0.05) between themselves in terms of vitamin C content and total titratable acidity. As for appearance and aroma, there was no significant difference (p>0.05) between the samples, and as for flavor and overall impression, the most accepted samples were those with sucrose and sucralose. The internal preference mapping indicated that the most accepted samples were those with sucrose, sucralose, and neotame were. The highest frequency of positive purchase intent scores was observed for sucrose and sucralose.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-20612013000400003&lng=en&tlng=enStevia rebaudianasucraloseneotameMalpighia emarginata DC
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mariana Borges de Lima Dutra
Helena Maria André Bolini
spellingShingle Mariana Borges de Lima Dutra
Helena Maria André Bolini
Sensory and physicochemical evaluation of acerola nectar sweetened with sucrose and different sweeteners
Food Science and Technology
Stevia rebaudiana
sucralose
neotame
Malpighia emarginata DC
author_facet Mariana Borges de Lima Dutra
Helena Maria André Bolini
author_sort Mariana Borges de Lima Dutra
title Sensory and physicochemical evaluation of acerola nectar sweetened with sucrose and different sweeteners
title_short Sensory and physicochemical evaluation of acerola nectar sweetened with sucrose and different sweeteners
title_full Sensory and physicochemical evaluation of acerola nectar sweetened with sucrose and different sweeteners
title_fullStr Sensory and physicochemical evaluation of acerola nectar sweetened with sucrose and different sweeteners
title_full_unstemmed Sensory and physicochemical evaluation of acerola nectar sweetened with sucrose and different sweeteners
title_sort sensory and physicochemical evaluation of acerola nectar sweetened with sucrose and different sweeteners
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos
series Food Science and Technology
issn 1678-457X
publishDate 2013-12-01
description This paper aims to evaluate the physicochemical characteristics, sensory acceptance, and purchase intent of acerola nectar sweetened with sucrose and other sweeteners (neotame, sucralose and stevia extracts with 40%, 60%, 80%, and 95% rebaudioside A). The analyses were carried out for pH, soluble solids, total titratable acidity, ascorbic acid, and colorimetry (L*a*b). The acceptance test was performed by 120 consumers who evaluated the appearance, aroma, flavor, texture, and overall impression of the samples using a 9-cm unstructured hedonic scale. Furthermore, the consumers were asked to rate overall purchase intent along the scale anchored with (1) "would definitely not purchase" to (5) "would definitely purchase." The results were evaluated using analysis of variance/Tukey test and the internal preference mapping technique. The acerola nectar samples did not differ significantly (p>0.05) between themselves in terms of vitamin C content and total titratable acidity. As for appearance and aroma, there was no significant difference (p>0.05) between the samples, and as for flavor and overall impression, the most accepted samples were those with sucrose and sucralose. The internal preference mapping indicated that the most accepted samples were those with sucrose, sucralose, and neotame were. The highest frequency of positive purchase intent scores was observed for sucrose and sucralose.
topic Stevia rebaudiana
sucralose
neotame
Malpighia emarginata DC
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-20612013000400003&lng=en&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT marianaborgesdelimadutra sensoryandphysicochemicalevaluationofacerolanectarsweetenedwithsucroseanddifferentsweeteners
AT helenamariaandrebolini sensoryandphysicochemicalevaluationofacerolanectarsweetenedwithsucroseanddifferentsweeteners
_version_ 1725641040823582720