Looking in the Mirror of Inquiry: Knowledge in Our Students and in Ourselves

At a large, urban community college located in the Northeastern United States, a group of faculty interested in helping students assume agency in their own learning used the methodology of Collaborative Inquiry (CI) as a way to examine the factors that help or hinder this process. Unexpected was the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lane Glisson, Shane McConnell, Mahatapa Palit, Jason Schneiderman, Cynthia Wiseman, Lyle Yorks
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Calgary 2014-03-01
Series:Teaching & Learning Inquiry: The ISSOTL Journal
Online Access:http://tlijournal.com/tli/index.php/TLI/article/view/63
id doaj-8c522bd4aecf406ea2c2483391e0df34
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8c522bd4aecf406ea2c2483391e0df342020-11-25T02:51:34ZengUniversity of CalgaryTeaching & Learning Inquiry: The ISSOTL Journal2167-47792167-47872014-03-012172010.20343/teachlearninqu.2.1.744Looking in the Mirror of Inquiry: Knowledge in Our Students and in OurselvesLane Glisson0Shane McConnell1Mahatapa Palit2Jason Schneiderman3Cynthia Wiseman4Lyle Yorks5BOROUGH OF MANHATTAN COMMUNITY COLLEGEBorough of Manhattan Community CollegeBOROUGH OF MANHATTAN COMMUNITY COLLEGE,BOROUGH OF MANHATTAN COMMUNITY COLLEGE,BOROUGH OF MANHATTAN COMMUNITY COLLEGE,TEACHERS COLLEGE, COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY,At a large, urban community college located in the Northeastern United States, a group of faculty interested in helping students assume agency in their own learning used the methodology of Collaborative Inquiry (CI) as a way to examine the factors that help or hinder this process. Unexpected was the epistemological shift they underwent as a result of the CI process. The group had hoped to find ways to make students less passive, starting with the question “How do we make students into makers of knowledge?” The CI methodology, however, required the faculty to examine themselves and their own relationship with the process of knowledge-making. Through the inquiry process, which required participants to question their own assumptions, they realized that, even though they considered themselves makers of knowledge within their respective fields, they had approached this knowledge-making process quite passively. The group members thus found themselves involved in a Collaborative Inquiry process that they hadn’t initially fully understood but which required that they become active makers of knowledge. As a result, members rejected many of the assumptions implicit in the original question and began to approach the challenge of teaching and learning more actively, more respectfully, and with more humility. This article offers a narrative of this group’s process, the conclusions they reached, a set of reflections, and considerations that others using the CI process for professional development oriented inquiries may find useful. KEYWORDS collaborative inquiry, second person inquiry, action research, experiential learning, transformative learninghttp://tlijournal.com/tli/index.php/TLI/article/view/63
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Lane Glisson
Shane McConnell
Mahatapa Palit
Jason Schneiderman
Cynthia Wiseman
Lyle Yorks
spellingShingle Lane Glisson
Shane McConnell
Mahatapa Palit
Jason Schneiderman
Cynthia Wiseman
Lyle Yorks
Looking in the Mirror of Inquiry: Knowledge in Our Students and in Ourselves
Teaching & Learning Inquiry: The ISSOTL Journal
author_facet Lane Glisson
Shane McConnell
Mahatapa Palit
Jason Schneiderman
Cynthia Wiseman
Lyle Yorks
author_sort Lane Glisson
title Looking in the Mirror of Inquiry: Knowledge in Our Students and in Ourselves
title_short Looking in the Mirror of Inquiry: Knowledge in Our Students and in Ourselves
title_full Looking in the Mirror of Inquiry: Knowledge in Our Students and in Ourselves
title_fullStr Looking in the Mirror of Inquiry: Knowledge in Our Students and in Ourselves
title_full_unstemmed Looking in the Mirror of Inquiry: Knowledge in Our Students and in Ourselves
title_sort looking in the mirror of inquiry: knowledge in our students and in ourselves
publisher University of Calgary
series Teaching & Learning Inquiry: The ISSOTL Journal
issn 2167-4779
2167-4787
publishDate 2014-03-01
description At a large, urban community college located in the Northeastern United States, a group of faculty interested in helping students assume agency in their own learning used the methodology of Collaborative Inquiry (CI) as a way to examine the factors that help or hinder this process. Unexpected was the epistemological shift they underwent as a result of the CI process. The group had hoped to find ways to make students less passive, starting with the question “How do we make students into makers of knowledge?” The CI methodology, however, required the faculty to examine themselves and their own relationship with the process of knowledge-making. Through the inquiry process, which required participants to question their own assumptions, they realized that, even though they considered themselves makers of knowledge within their respective fields, they had approached this knowledge-making process quite passively. The group members thus found themselves involved in a Collaborative Inquiry process that they hadn’t initially fully understood but which required that they become active makers of knowledge. As a result, members rejected many of the assumptions implicit in the original question and began to approach the challenge of teaching and learning more actively, more respectfully, and with more humility. This article offers a narrative of this group’s process, the conclusions they reached, a set of reflections, and considerations that others using the CI process for professional development oriented inquiries may find useful. KEYWORDS collaborative inquiry, second person inquiry, action research, experiential learning, transformative learning
url http://tlijournal.com/tli/index.php/TLI/article/view/63
work_keys_str_mv AT laneglisson lookinginthemirrorofinquiryknowledgeinourstudentsandinourselves
AT shanemcconnell lookinginthemirrorofinquiryknowledgeinourstudentsandinourselves
AT mahatapapalit lookinginthemirrorofinquiryknowledgeinourstudentsandinourselves
AT jasonschneiderman lookinginthemirrorofinquiryknowledgeinourstudentsandinourselves
AT cynthiawiseman lookinginthemirrorofinquiryknowledgeinourstudentsandinourselves
AT lyleyorks lookinginthemirrorofinquiryknowledgeinourstudentsandinourselves
_version_ 1724733795606724608