How Ready Is Higher Education Faculty for Engaged Student Learning? Applying Transtheoretical Model to Measure Service-Learning Beliefs and Adoption
This study examined service-learning (SL) beliefs and participation among faculty in different stages of involvement to develop tailored resources and support. A representative sample of 1,200 faculty members at a major public university in Southeast United States was recruited. The study used the t...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2015-02-01
|
Series: | SAGE Open |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244015572282 |
id |
doaj-8a177349a3664d98ac4d664598c2ecf2 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-8a177349a3664d98ac4d664598c2ecf22020-11-25T04:00:29ZengSAGE PublishingSAGE Open2158-24402015-02-01510.1177/215824401557228210.1177_2158244015572282How Ready Is Higher Education Faculty for Engaged Student Learning? Applying Transtheoretical Model to Measure Service-Learning Beliefs and AdoptionSu-I Hou0Shannon Wilder1The University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USAThe University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USAThis study examined service-learning (SL) beliefs and participation among faculty in different stages of involvement to develop tailored resources and support. A representative sample of 1,200 faculty members at a major public university in Southeast United States was recruited. The study used the transtheoretical model (TTM) as an innovative way to group SL involvement into five stages: unaware (U), pre-contemplation (PC), contemplation (C), preparation (Prep), and action and maintenance (A/M). Perceived benefits and barriers at different levels were assessed. The distribution among faculty who completed the online survey ( n = 450, 60% males) across stages was 20% (U), 31% (PC), 16% (C), 10% (Prep), and 23% (A/M). Analyses showed significant differences on the 4 SL beliefs, F (3, 358) ranged from 7.05 to 78.31, all p < .001, across stages. This study provides the first valuable empirical data to support the application of TTM to the SL arena and identified salient variables influencing faculty involvement across stages.https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244015572282 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Su-I Hou Shannon Wilder |
spellingShingle |
Su-I Hou Shannon Wilder How Ready Is Higher Education Faculty for Engaged Student Learning? Applying Transtheoretical Model to Measure Service-Learning Beliefs and Adoption SAGE Open |
author_facet |
Su-I Hou Shannon Wilder |
author_sort |
Su-I Hou |
title |
How Ready Is Higher Education Faculty for Engaged Student Learning? Applying Transtheoretical Model to Measure Service-Learning Beliefs and Adoption |
title_short |
How Ready Is Higher Education Faculty for Engaged Student Learning? Applying Transtheoretical Model to Measure Service-Learning Beliefs and Adoption |
title_full |
How Ready Is Higher Education Faculty for Engaged Student Learning? Applying Transtheoretical Model to Measure Service-Learning Beliefs and Adoption |
title_fullStr |
How Ready Is Higher Education Faculty for Engaged Student Learning? Applying Transtheoretical Model to Measure Service-Learning Beliefs and Adoption |
title_full_unstemmed |
How Ready Is Higher Education Faculty for Engaged Student Learning? Applying Transtheoretical Model to Measure Service-Learning Beliefs and Adoption |
title_sort |
how ready is higher education faculty for engaged student learning? applying transtheoretical model to measure service-learning beliefs and adoption |
publisher |
SAGE Publishing |
series |
SAGE Open |
issn |
2158-2440 |
publishDate |
2015-02-01 |
description |
This study examined service-learning (SL) beliefs and participation among faculty in different stages of involvement to develop tailored resources and support. A representative sample of 1,200 faculty members at a major public university in Southeast United States was recruited. The study used the transtheoretical model (TTM) as an innovative way to group SL involvement into five stages: unaware (U), pre-contemplation (PC), contemplation (C), preparation (Prep), and action and maintenance (A/M). Perceived benefits and barriers at different levels were assessed. The distribution among faculty who completed the online survey ( n = 450, 60% males) across stages was 20% (U), 31% (PC), 16% (C), 10% (Prep), and 23% (A/M). Analyses showed significant differences on the 4 SL beliefs, F (3, 358) ranged from 7.05 to 78.31, all p < .001, across stages. This study provides the first valuable empirical data to support the application of TTM to the SL arena and identified salient variables influencing faculty involvement across stages. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244015572282 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT suihou howreadyishighereducationfacultyforengagedstudentlearningapplyingtranstheoreticalmodeltomeasureservicelearningbeliefsandadoption AT shannonwilder howreadyishighereducationfacultyforengagedstudentlearningapplyingtranstheoreticalmodeltomeasureservicelearningbeliefsandadoption |
_version_ |
1724450272882720768 |