How Ready Is Higher Education Faculty for Engaged Student Learning? Applying Transtheoretical Model to Measure Service-Learning Beliefs and Adoption

This study examined service-learning (SL) beliefs and participation among faculty in different stages of involvement to develop tailored resources and support. A representative sample of 1,200 faculty members at a major public university in Southeast United States was recruited. The study used the t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Su-I Hou, Shannon Wilder
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2015-02-01
Series:SAGE Open
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244015572282
id doaj-8a177349a3664d98ac4d664598c2ecf2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8a177349a3664d98ac4d664598c2ecf22020-11-25T04:00:29ZengSAGE PublishingSAGE Open2158-24402015-02-01510.1177/215824401557228210.1177_2158244015572282How Ready Is Higher Education Faculty for Engaged Student Learning? Applying Transtheoretical Model to Measure Service-Learning Beliefs and AdoptionSu-I Hou0Shannon Wilder1The University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USAThe University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USAThis study examined service-learning (SL) beliefs and participation among faculty in different stages of involvement to develop tailored resources and support. A representative sample of 1,200 faculty members at a major public university in Southeast United States was recruited. The study used the transtheoretical model (TTM) as an innovative way to group SL involvement into five stages: unaware (U), pre-contemplation (PC), contemplation (C), preparation (Prep), and action and maintenance (A/M). Perceived benefits and barriers at different levels were assessed. The distribution among faculty who completed the online survey ( n = 450, 60% males) across stages was 20% (U), 31% (PC), 16% (C), 10% (Prep), and 23% (A/M). Analyses showed significant differences on the 4 SL beliefs, F (3, 358) ranged from 7.05 to 78.31, all p < .001, across stages. This study provides the first valuable empirical data to support the application of TTM to the SL arena and identified salient variables influencing faculty involvement across stages.https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244015572282
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Su-I Hou
Shannon Wilder
spellingShingle Su-I Hou
Shannon Wilder
How Ready Is Higher Education Faculty for Engaged Student Learning? Applying Transtheoretical Model to Measure Service-Learning Beliefs and Adoption
SAGE Open
author_facet Su-I Hou
Shannon Wilder
author_sort Su-I Hou
title How Ready Is Higher Education Faculty for Engaged Student Learning? Applying Transtheoretical Model to Measure Service-Learning Beliefs and Adoption
title_short How Ready Is Higher Education Faculty for Engaged Student Learning? Applying Transtheoretical Model to Measure Service-Learning Beliefs and Adoption
title_full How Ready Is Higher Education Faculty for Engaged Student Learning? Applying Transtheoretical Model to Measure Service-Learning Beliefs and Adoption
title_fullStr How Ready Is Higher Education Faculty for Engaged Student Learning? Applying Transtheoretical Model to Measure Service-Learning Beliefs and Adoption
title_full_unstemmed How Ready Is Higher Education Faculty for Engaged Student Learning? Applying Transtheoretical Model to Measure Service-Learning Beliefs and Adoption
title_sort how ready is higher education faculty for engaged student learning? applying transtheoretical model to measure service-learning beliefs and adoption
publisher SAGE Publishing
series SAGE Open
issn 2158-2440
publishDate 2015-02-01
description This study examined service-learning (SL) beliefs and participation among faculty in different stages of involvement to develop tailored resources and support. A representative sample of 1,200 faculty members at a major public university in Southeast United States was recruited. The study used the transtheoretical model (TTM) as an innovative way to group SL involvement into five stages: unaware (U), pre-contemplation (PC), contemplation (C), preparation (Prep), and action and maintenance (A/M). Perceived benefits and barriers at different levels were assessed. The distribution among faculty who completed the online survey ( n = 450, 60% males) across stages was 20% (U), 31% (PC), 16% (C), 10% (Prep), and 23% (A/M). Analyses showed significant differences on the 4 SL beliefs, F (3, 358) ranged from 7.05 to 78.31, all p < .001, across stages. This study provides the first valuable empirical data to support the application of TTM to the SL arena and identified salient variables influencing faculty involvement across stages.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244015572282
work_keys_str_mv AT suihou howreadyishighereducationfacultyforengagedstudentlearningapplyingtranstheoreticalmodeltomeasureservicelearningbeliefsandadoption
AT shannonwilder howreadyishighereducationfacultyforengagedstudentlearningapplyingtranstheoreticalmodeltomeasureservicelearningbeliefsandadoption
_version_ 1724450272882720768