Comparison postharvest quality of conventionally and organically grown ‘Washington Navel’ oranges

This study aimed to compare postharvest quality of conventionally and organically grown ‘Washington Navel’ oranges. Oranges from the conventional and certified organic citrus orchards were harvested at commercial maturity and kept at 4°C for 5 months. Changes in weight loss, juice percentage, titra...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Elif Çandır, Müge Kamiloğlu, Durmuş Üstün, Gülcan Tuğçe Kendir
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Julius Kühn-Institut 2013-08-01
Series:Journal of Applied Botany and Food Quality
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ojs.openagrar.de/index.php/JABFQ/article/view/2395
id doaj-896facffa1654155b0247c96f68769bf
record_format Article
spelling doaj-896facffa1654155b0247c96f68769bf2021-03-02T07:11:55ZengJulius Kühn-InstitutJournal of Applied Botany and Food Quality1613-92161439-040X2013-08-0186110.5073/JABFQ.2013.086.0092395Comparison postharvest quality of conventionally and organically grown ‘Washington Navel’ orangesElif Çandır0Müge Kamiloğlu1Durmuş Üstün2Gülcan Tuğçe Kendir3Mustafa Kemal UniversityMustafa Kemal UniversityMustafa Kemal UniversityMustafa Kemal University This study aimed to compare postharvest quality of conventionally and organically grown ‘Washington Navel’ oranges. Oranges from the conventional and certified organic citrus orchards were harvested at commercial maturity and kept at 4°C for 5 months. Changes in weight loss, juice percentage, titratable acidity (TA), total soluble solid (TSS), sugars (fructose, glucose and sucrose), organic acids (citric, malic and ascorbic acid) content and incidence of fungal decay and chilling injury were determined at a month interval during storage. Conventionally grown oranges had lower weight loss and higher juice percentage than organically grown oranges during storage. Rind color (L*, C*, hº), TSS, sugar (fructose, glucose and sucrose) and malic acid content were not affected by the production systems at harvest and during storage. In both conventionally and organically grown oranges, rind color become darker (lower L*), more intense (higher C*) and deeper orange color (lower hº) while malic acid content remained constant during 5 months of storage. As storage time extended, a significant increase in TSS and sugar content and a decrease TA and citric acid content occurred in fruits from both production system. Compared to conventionally grown oranges, organically grown oranges had lower TA and citric acid, but better taste scores since they attained higher TSS/TA ratio at harvest and during storage. The taste of conventionally and organically grown oranges was rated as an acceptable throughout the storage period. Although there was no significant difference in  ascorbic acid content of fruits between two production systems at harvest, lower ascorbic acid content was found in organically grown oranges, compared to conventionally grown oranges during storage. Incidence of fungal decay was low in conventionally and organically grown oranges after 5 months of storage and the production system did not affect the sensitivity to fungal decay. Chilling injury was not observed any of fruits from both production systems throughout storage period. https://ojs.openagrar.de/index.php/JABFQ/article/view/2395Orangesconventionalorganicstoragequalitysugar
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Elif Çandır
Müge Kamiloğlu
Durmuş Üstün
Gülcan Tuğçe Kendir
spellingShingle Elif Çandır
Müge Kamiloğlu
Durmuş Üstün
Gülcan Tuğçe Kendir
Comparison postharvest quality of conventionally and organically grown ‘Washington Navel’ oranges
Journal of Applied Botany and Food Quality
Oranges
conventional
organic
storage
quality
sugar
author_facet Elif Çandır
Müge Kamiloğlu
Durmuş Üstün
Gülcan Tuğçe Kendir
author_sort Elif Çandır
title Comparison postharvest quality of conventionally and organically grown ‘Washington Navel’ oranges
title_short Comparison postharvest quality of conventionally and organically grown ‘Washington Navel’ oranges
title_full Comparison postharvest quality of conventionally and organically grown ‘Washington Navel’ oranges
title_fullStr Comparison postharvest quality of conventionally and organically grown ‘Washington Navel’ oranges
title_full_unstemmed Comparison postharvest quality of conventionally and organically grown ‘Washington Navel’ oranges
title_sort comparison postharvest quality of conventionally and organically grown ‘washington navel’ oranges
publisher Julius Kühn-Institut
series Journal of Applied Botany and Food Quality
issn 1613-9216
1439-040X
publishDate 2013-08-01
description This study aimed to compare postharvest quality of conventionally and organically grown ‘Washington Navel’ oranges. Oranges from the conventional and certified organic citrus orchards were harvested at commercial maturity and kept at 4°C for 5 months. Changes in weight loss, juice percentage, titratable acidity (TA), total soluble solid (TSS), sugars (fructose, glucose and sucrose), organic acids (citric, malic and ascorbic acid) content and incidence of fungal decay and chilling injury were determined at a month interval during storage. Conventionally grown oranges had lower weight loss and higher juice percentage than organically grown oranges during storage. Rind color (L*, C*, hº), TSS, sugar (fructose, glucose and sucrose) and malic acid content were not affected by the production systems at harvest and during storage. In both conventionally and organically grown oranges, rind color become darker (lower L*), more intense (higher C*) and deeper orange color (lower hº) while malic acid content remained constant during 5 months of storage. As storage time extended, a significant increase in TSS and sugar content and a decrease TA and citric acid content occurred in fruits from both production system. Compared to conventionally grown oranges, organically grown oranges had lower TA and citric acid, but better taste scores since they attained higher TSS/TA ratio at harvest and during storage. The taste of conventionally and organically grown oranges was rated as an acceptable throughout the storage period. Although there was no significant difference in  ascorbic acid content of fruits between two production systems at harvest, lower ascorbic acid content was found in organically grown oranges, compared to conventionally grown oranges during storage. Incidence of fungal decay was low in conventionally and organically grown oranges after 5 months of storage and the production system did not affect the sensitivity to fungal decay. Chilling injury was not observed any of fruits from both production systems throughout storage period.
topic Oranges
conventional
organic
storage
quality
sugar
url https://ojs.openagrar.de/index.php/JABFQ/article/view/2395
work_keys_str_mv AT elifcandır comparisonpostharvestqualityofconventionallyandorganicallygrownwashingtonnaveloranges
AT mugekamiloglu comparisonpostharvestqualityofconventionallyandorganicallygrownwashingtonnaveloranges
AT durmusustun comparisonpostharvestqualityofconventionallyandorganicallygrownwashingtonnaveloranges
AT gulcantugcekendir comparisonpostharvestqualityofconventionallyandorganicallygrownwashingtonnaveloranges
_version_ 1724241674348003328