Towards an understanding of the relative strengths of positive and negative reciprocity

Scholars in economics and psychology have created a large literature studying reward, punishment and reciprocity. Labor markets constitute a popular application of this body of work, with particular emphasis on how reciprocity helps regulate workplace relationships where managers are unable to perfe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Omar Al-Ubaydli, Uri Gneezy, Min Sok Lee, John A. List
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Society for Judgment and Decision Making 2010-12-01
Series:Judgment and Decision Making
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.sjdm.org/10/10707/jdm10707.pdf
id doaj-86c92211c257492494a10428554b619c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-86c92211c257492494a10428554b619c2021-05-02T01:13:02ZengSociety for Judgment and Decision MakingJudgment and Decision Making1930-29752010-12-0157524539Towards an understanding of the relative strengths of positive and negative reciprocityOmar Al-UbaydliUri GneezyMin Sok LeeJohn A. ListScholars in economics and psychology have created a large literature studying reward, punishment and reciprocity. Labor markets constitute a popular application of this body of work, with particular emphasis on how reciprocity helps regulate workplace relationships where managers are unable to perfectly monitor workers. We study how idiosyncratic features of the labor market (compared to most scenarios in which reciprocity applies) affect the nature of worker reciprocity. In particular, we show how having an excess supply of workers (simulating unemployment) and managers who can observe the reciprocal behavior of workers and hire/fire them on that basis (simulating the reputational concerns inherent in labor market transactions) profoundly alters worker reciprocity. In the absence of reputational concerns, workers tend to reward kind behavior and punish unkind behavior by managers in approximately equal measure. In the presence of reputational concerns, workers exhibit a marked increase (decrease) in the propensity to reward kind (punish unkind) behavior by managers. We demonstrate how this is a consequence of workers and managers responding to changes in the strategic incentives to reward and punish. %JEL codes: D03, D63, J3, J53 http://journal.sjdm.org/10/10707/jdm10707.pdfreciprocityreputationrewardpunishmentgift-exchange.NAKeywords
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Omar Al-Ubaydli
Uri Gneezy
Min Sok Lee
John A. List
spellingShingle Omar Al-Ubaydli
Uri Gneezy
Min Sok Lee
John A. List
Towards an understanding of the relative strengths of positive and negative reciprocity
Judgment and Decision Making
reciprocity
reputation
reward
punishment
gift-exchange.NAKeywords
author_facet Omar Al-Ubaydli
Uri Gneezy
Min Sok Lee
John A. List
author_sort Omar Al-Ubaydli
title Towards an understanding of the relative strengths of positive and negative reciprocity
title_short Towards an understanding of the relative strengths of positive and negative reciprocity
title_full Towards an understanding of the relative strengths of positive and negative reciprocity
title_fullStr Towards an understanding of the relative strengths of positive and negative reciprocity
title_full_unstemmed Towards an understanding of the relative strengths of positive and negative reciprocity
title_sort towards an understanding of the relative strengths of positive and negative reciprocity
publisher Society for Judgment and Decision Making
series Judgment and Decision Making
issn 1930-2975
publishDate 2010-12-01
description Scholars in economics and psychology have created a large literature studying reward, punishment and reciprocity. Labor markets constitute a popular application of this body of work, with particular emphasis on how reciprocity helps regulate workplace relationships where managers are unable to perfectly monitor workers. We study how idiosyncratic features of the labor market (compared to most scenarios in which reciprocity applies) affect the nature of worker reciprocity. In particular, we show how having an excess supply of workers (simulating unemployment) and managers who can observe the reciprocal behavior of workers and hire/fire them on that basis (simulating the reputational concerns inherent in labor market transactions) profoundly alters worker reciprocity. In the absence of reputational concerns, workers tend to reward kind behavior and punish unkind behavior by managers in approximately equal measure. In the presence of reputational concerns, workers exhibit a marked increase (decrease) in the propensity to reward kind (punish unkind) behavior by managers. We demonstrate how this is a consequence of workers and managers responding to changes in the strategic incentives to reward and punish. %JEL codes: D03, D63, J3, J53
topic reciprocity
reputation
reward
punishment
gift-exchange.NAKeywords
url http://journal.sjdm.org/10/10707/jdm10707.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT omaralubaydli towardsanunderstandingoftherelativestrengthsofpositiveandnegativereciprocity
AT urigneezy towardsanunderstandingoftherelativestrengthsofpositiveandnegativereciprocity
AT minsoklee towardsanunderstandingoftherelativestrengthsofpositiveandnegativereciprocity
AT johnalist towardsanunderstandingoftherelativestrengthsofpositiveandnegativereciprocity
_version_ 1721496619775426560