Towards an understanding of the relative strengths of positive and negative reciprocity
Scholars in economics and psychology have created a large literature studying reward, punishment and reciprocity. Labor markets constitute a popular application of this body of work, with particular emphasis on how reciprocity helps regulate workplace relationships where managers are unable to perfe...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Society for Judgment and Decision Making
2010-12-01
|
Series: | Judgment and Decision Making |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journal.sjdm.org/10/10707/jdm10707.pdf |
id |
doaj-86c92211c257492494a10428554b619c |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-86c92211c257492494a10428554b619c2021-05-02T01:13:02ZengSociety for Judgment and Decision MakingJudgment and Decision Making1930-29752010-12-0157524539Towards an understanding of the relative strengths of positive and negative reciprocityOmar Al-UbaydliUri GneezyMin Sok LeeJohn A. ListScholars in economics and psychology have created a large literature studying reward, punishment and reciprocity. Labor markets constitute a popular application of this body of work, with particular emphasis on how reciprocity helps regulate workplace relationships where managers are unable to perfectly monitor workers. We study how idiosyncratic features of the labor market (compared to most scenarios in which reciprocity applies) affect the nature of worker reciprocity. In particular, we show how having an excess supply of workers (simulating unemployment) and managers who can observe the reciprocal behavior of workers and hire/fire them on that basis (simulating the reputational concerns inherent in labor market transactions) profoundly alters worker reciprocity. In the absence of reputational concerns, workers tend to reward kind behavior and punish unkind behavior by managers in approximately equal measure. In the presence of reputational concerns, workers exhibit a marked increase (decrease) in the propensity to reward kind (punish unkind) behavior by managers. We demonstrate how this is a consequence of workers and managers responding to changes in the strategic incentives to reward and punish. %JEL codes: D03, D63, J3, J53 http://journal.sjdm.org/10/10707/jdm10707.pdfreciprocityreputationrewardpunishmentgift-exchange.NAKeywords |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Omar Al-Ubaydli Uri Gneezy Min Sok Lee John A. List |
spellingShingle |
Omar Al-Ubaydli Uri Gneezy Min Sok Lee John A. List Towards an understanding of the relative strengths of positive and negative reciprocity Judgment and Decision Making reciprocity reputation reward punishment gift-exchange.NAKeywords |
author_facet |
Omar Al-Ubaydli Uri Gneezy Min Sok Lee John A. List |
author_sort |
Omar Al-Ubaydli |
title |
Towards an understanding of the relative strengths of positive and negative reciprocity |
title_short |
Towards an understanding of the relative strengths of positive and negative reciprocity |
title_full |
Towards an understanding of the relative strengths of positive and negative reciprocity |
title_fullStr |
Towards an understanding of the relative strengths of positive and negative reciprocity |
title_full_unstemmed |
Towards an understanding of the relative strengths of positive and negative reciprocity |
title_sort |
towards an understanding of the relative strengths of positive and negative reciprocity |
publisher |
Society for Judgment and Decision Making |
series |
Judgment and Decision Making |
issn |
1930-2975 |
publishDate |
2010-12-01 |
description |
Scholars in economics and psychology have created a large literature studying reward, punishment and reciprocity. Labor markets constitute a popular application of this body of work, with particular emphasis on how reciprocity helps regulate workplace relationships where managers are unable to perfectly monitor workers. We study how idiosyncratic features of the labor market (compared to most scenarios in which reciprocity applies) affect the nature of worker reciprocity. In particular, we show how having an excess supply of workers (simulating unemployment) and managers who can observe the reciprocal behavior of workers and hire/fire them on that basis (simulating the reputational concerns inherent in labor market transactions) profoundly alters worker reciprocity. In the absence of reputational concerns, workers tend to reward kind behavior and punish unkind behavior by managers in approximately equal measure. In the presence of reputational concerns, workers exhibit a marked increase (decrease) in the propensity to reward kind (punish unkind) behavior by managers. We demonstrate how this is a consequence of workers and managers responding to changes in the strategic incentives to reward and punish. %JEL codes: D03, D63, J3, J53 |
topic |
reciprocity reputation reward punishment gift-exchange.NAKeywords |
url |
http://journal.sjdm.org/10/10707/jdm10707.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT omaralubaydli towardsanunderstandingoftherelativestrengthsofpositiveandnegativereciprocity AT urigneezy towardsanunderstandingoftherelativestrengthsofpositiveandnegativereciprocity AT minsoklee towardsanunderstandingoftherelativestrengthsofpositiveandnegativereciprocity AT johnalist towardsanunderstandingoftherelativestrengthsofpositiveandnegativereciprocity |
_version_ |
1721496619775426560 |