GC-Content Normalization for RNA-Seq Data

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Transcriptome sequencing (RNA-Seq) has become the assay of choice for high-throughput studies of gene expression. However, as is the case with microarrays, major technology-related artifacts and biases affect the resulting expression...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Risso Davide, Schwartz Katja, Sherlock Gavin, Dudoit Sandrine
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2011-12-01
Series:BMC Bioinformatics
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/12/480
Description
Summary:<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Transcriptome sequencing (RNA-Seq) has become the assay of choice for high-throughput studies of gene expression. However, as is the case with microarrays, major technology-related artifacts and biases affect the resulting expression measures. Normalization is therefore essential to ensure accurate inference of expression levels and subsequent analyses thereof.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>We focus on biases related to GC-content and demonstrate the existence of strong sample-specific GC-content effects on RNA-Seq read counts, which can substantially bias differential expression analysis. We propose three simple within-lane gene-level GC-content normalization approaches and assess their performance on two different RNA-Seq datasets, involving different species and experimental designs. Our methods are compared to state-of-the-art normalization procedures in terms of bias and mean squared error for expression fold-change estimation and in terms of Type I error and <it>p</it>-value distributions for tests of differential expression. The exploratory data analysis and normalization methods proposed in this article are implemented in the open-source Bioconductor R package EDASeq.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Our within-lane normalization procedures, followed by between-lane normalization, reduce GC-content bias and lead to more accurate estimates of expression fold-changes and tests of differential expression. Such results are crucial for the biological interpretation of RNA-Seq experiments, where downstream analyses can be sensitive to the supplied lists of genes.</p>
ISSN:1471-2105