THE EFFECTS OF CONTROLLED SKIDDING TECHNIQUE ON RESIDUAL STAND DAMAGE AND GROUND EXPOSURE IN SWAMP FOREST LOGGING

The  case study was  carried  out at a swamp forest company  in Riau in 2001.   The  aim of the study  was to determine  the effect of controlled skidding technique  to residual  stand damage and ground  exposure. Data  collected  includes:  felled trees, poles,   trees with  the diameter 20 cm up,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sona Suhartana
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Ministry of Environment and Forestry 2004-11-01
Series:Indonesian Journal of Forestry Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ejournal.forda-mof.org/ejournal-litbang/index.php/IJFR/article/view/480
id doaj-7667339c04f54108981bf009c7df2d6c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7667339c04f54108981bf009c7df2d6c2020-11-24T23:42:39ZengMinistry of Environment and ForestryIndonesian Journal of Forestry Research2355-70792406-81952004-11-01111610.20886/ijfr.2004.1.1.1-6480THE EFFECTS OF CONTROLLED SKIDDING TECHNIQUE ON RESIDUAL STAND DAMAGE AND GROUND EXPOSURE IN SWAMP FOREST LOGGINGSona Suhartana0Forest Products Techhnology Research and Development CenterThe  case study was  carried  out at a swamp forest company  in Riau in 2001.   The  aim of the study  was to determine  the effect of controlled skidding technique  to residual  stand damage and ground  exposure. Data  collected  includes:  felled trees, poles,   trees with  the diameter 20 cm up, damaged poles, damaged  trees and ground  exposure.  The data was  analyzed with t-test.  The study showed  the following results: • The  average of  residual stand  damage caused by controlled  skidding technique  was  29.05% for poles and 19.8%  for trees. The average of residual stand damage caused by conventional skidding technique  was 34.2% for poles and  24.9%   for trees.  The difference  of  5.1%   (poles) and 5.1 % (trees) were significant  at 95%. • The  average of ground  exposure  caused by controlled  skidding  technique  and conventionalskidding technique was respectively   16.06% and 18.4%.  The difference of 2.34%  was significant at 95%.http://ejournal.forda-mof.org/ejournal-litbang/index.php/IJFR/article/view/480controlled skidding techniqueresidual stand damageground exposure
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sona Suhartana
spellingShingle Sona Suhartana
THE EFFECTS OF CONTROLLED SKIDDING TECHNIQUE ON RESIDUAL STAND DAMAGE AND GROUND EXPOSURE IN SWAMP FOREST LOGGING
Indonesian Journal of Forestry Research
controlled skidding technique
residual stand damage
ground exposure
author_facet Sona Suhartana
author_sort Sona Suhartana
title THE EFFECTS OF CONTROLLED SKIDDING TECHNIQUE ON RESIDUAL STAND DAMAGE AND GROUND EXPOSURE IN SWAMP FOREST LOGGING
title_short THE EFFECTS OF CONTROLLED SKIDDING TECHNIQUE ON RESIDUAL STAND DAMAGE AND GROUND EXPOSURE IN SWAMP FOREST LOGGING
title_full THE EFFECTS OF CONTROLLED SKIDDING TECHNIQUE ON RESIDUAL STAND DAMAGE AND GROUND EXPOSURE IN SWAMP FOREST LOGGING
title_fullStr THE EFFECTS OF CONTROLLED SKIDDING TECHNIQUE ON RESIDUAL STAND DAMAGE AND GROUND EXPOSURE IN SWAMP FOREST LOGGING
title_full_unstemmed THE EFFECTS OF CONTROLLED SKIDDING TECHNIQUE ON RESIDUAL STAND DAMAGE AND GROUND EXPOSURE IN SWAMP FOREST LOGGING
title_sort effects of controlled skidding technique on residual stand damage and ground exposure in swamp forest logging
publisher Ministry of Environment and Forestry
series Indonesian Journal of Forestry Research
issn 2355-7079
2406-8195
publishDate 2004-11-01
description The  case study was  carried  out at a swamp forest company  in Riau in 2001.   The  aim of the study  was to determine  the effect of controlled skidding technique  to residual  stand damage and ground  exposure. Data  collected  includes:  felled trees, poles,   trees with  the diameter 20 cm up, damaged poles, damaged  trees and ground  exposure.  The data was  analyzed with t-test.  The study showed  the following results: • The  average of  residual stand  damage caused by controlled  skidding technique  was  29.05% for poles and 19.8%  for trees. The average of residual stand damage caused by conventional skidding technique  was 34.2% for poles and  24.9%   for trees.  The difference  of  5.1%   (poles) and 5.1 % (trees) were significant  at 95%. • The  average of ground  exposure  caused by controlled  skidding  technique  and conventionalskidding technique was respectively   16.06% and 18.4%.  The difference of 2.34%  was significant at 95%.
topic controlled skidding technique
residual stand damage
ground exposure
url http://ejournal.forda-mof.org/ejournal-litbang/index.php/IJFR/article/view/480
work_keys_str_mv AT sonasuhartana theeffectsofcontrolledskiddingtechniqueonresidualstanddamageandgroundexposureinswampforestlogging
AT sonasuhartana effectsofcontrolledskiddingtechniqueonresidualstanddamageandgroundexposureinswampforestlogging
_version_ 1725503751630880768