Analytical Sensitivity Comparison between Singleplex Real-Time PCR and a Multiplex PCR Platform for Detecting Respiratory Viruses.

Multiplex PCR methods are attractive to clinical laboratories wanting to broaden their detection of respiratory viral pathogens in clinical specimens. However, multiplexed assays must be well optimized to retain or improve upon the analytic sensitivity of their singleplex counterparts. In this exper...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jayme Parker, Nisha Fowler, Mary Louise Walmsley, Terri Schmidt, Jason Scharrer, James Kowaleski, Teresa Grimes, Shanann Hoyos, Jack Chen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2015-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4646456?pdf=render
id doaj-6f98f4d0458448e9a2384cb4d4f2ef06
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6f98f4d0458448e9a2384cb4d4f2ef062020-11-24T20:41:39ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032015-01-011011e014316410.1371/journal.pone.0143164Analytical Sensitivity Comparison between Singleplex Real-Time PCR and a Multiplex PCR Platform for Detecting Respiratory Viruses.Jayme ParkerNisha FowlerMary Louise WalmsleyTerri SchmidtJason ScharrerJames KowaleskiTeresa GrimesShanann HoyosJack ChenMultiplex PCR methods are attractive to clinical laboratories wanting to broaden their detection of respiratory viral pathogens in clinical specimens. However, multiplexed assays must be well optimized to retain or improve upon the analytic sensitivity of their singleplex counterparts. In this experiment, the lower limit of detection (LOD) of singleplex real-time PCR assays targeting respiratory viruses is compared to an equivalent panel on a multiplex PCR platform, the GenMark eSensor RVP. LODs were measured for each singleplex real-time PCR assay and expressed as the lowest copy number detected 95-100% of the time, depending on the assay. The GenMark eSensor RVP LODs were obtained by converting the TCID50/mL concentrations reported in the package insert to copies/μL using qPCR. Analytical sensitivity between the two methods varied from 1.2-1280.8 copies/μL (0.08-3.11 log differences) for all 12 assays compared. Assays targeting influenza A/H3N2, influenza A/H1N1pdm09, influenza B, and human parainfluenza 1 and 2 were most comparable (1.2-8.4 copies/μL, <1 log difference). Largest differences in LOD were demonstrated for assays targeting adenovirus group E, respiratory syncytial virus subtype A, and a generic assay for all influenza A viruses regardless of subtype (319.4-1280.8 copies/μL, 2.50-3.11 log difference). The multiplex PCR platform, the GenMark eSensor RVP, demonstrated improved analytical sensitivity for detecting influenza A/H3 viruses, influenza B virus, human parainfluenza virus 2, and human rhinovirus (1.6-94.8 copies/μL, 0.20-1.98 logs). Broader detection of influenza A/H3 viruses was demonstrated by the GenMark eSensor RVP. The relationship between TCID50/mL concentrations and the corresponding copy number related to various ATCC cultures is also reported.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4646456?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jayme Parker
Nisha Fowler
Mary Louise Walmsley
Terri Schmidt
Jason Scharrer
James Kowaleski
Teresa Grimes
Shanann Hoyos
Jack Chen
spellingShingle Jayme Parker
Nisha Fowler
Mary Louise Walmsley
Terri Schmidt
Jason Scharrer
James Kowaleski
Teresa Grimes
Shanann Hoyos
Jack Chen
Analytical Sensitivity Comparison between Singleplex Real-Time PCR and a Multiplex PCR Platform for Detecting Respiratory Viruses.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Jayme Parker
Nisha Fowler
Mary Louise Walmsley
Terri Schmidt
Jason Scharrer
James Kowaleski
Teresa Grimes
Shanann Hoyos
Jack Chen
author_sort Jayme Parker
title Analytical Sensitivity Comparison between Singleplex Real-Time PCR and a Multiplex PCR Platform for Detecting Respiratory Viruses.
title_short Analytical Sensitivity Comparison between Singleplex Real-Time PCR and a Multiplex PCR Platform for Detecting Respiratory Viruses.
title_full Analytical Sensitivity Comparison between Singleplex Real-Time PCR and a Multiplex PCR Platform for Detecting Respiratory Viruses.
title_fullStr Analytical Sensitivity Comparison between Singleplex Real-Time PCR and a Multiplex PCR Platform for Detecting Respiratory Viruses.
title_full_unstemmed Analytical Sensitivity Comparison between Singleplex Real-Time PCR and a Multiplex PCR Platform for Detecting Respiratory Viruses.
title_sort analytical sensitivity comparison between singleplex real-time pcr and a multiplex pcr platform for detecting respiratory viruses.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2015-01-01
description Multiplex PCR methods are attractive to clinical laboratories wanting to broaden their detection of respiratory viral pathogens in clinical specimens. However, multiplexed assays must be well optimized to retain or improve upon the analytic sensitivity of their singleplex counterparts. In this experiment, the lower limit of detection (LOD) of singleplex real-time PCR assays targeting respiratory viruses is compared to an equivalent panel on a multiplex PCR platform, the GenMark eSensor RVP. LODs were measured for each singleplex real-time PCR assay and expressed as the lowest copy number detected 95-100% of the time, depending on the assay. The GenMark eSensor RVP LODs were obtained by converting the TCID50/mL concentrations reported in the package insert to copies/μL using qPCR. Analytical sensitivity between the two methods varied from 1.2-1280.8 copies/μL (0.08-3.11 log differences) for all 12 assays compared. Assays targeting influenza A/H3N2, influenza A/H1N1pdm09, influenza B, and human parainfluenza 1 and 2 were most comparable (1.2-8.4 copies/μL, <1 log difference). Largest differences in LOD were demonstrated for assays targeting adenovirus group E, respiratory syncytial virus subtype A, and a generic assay for all influenza A viruses regardless of subtype (319.4-1280.8 copies/μL, 2.50-3.11 log difference). The multiplex PCR platform, the GenMark eSensor RVP, demonstrated improved analytical sensitivity for detecting influenza A/H3 viruses, influenza B virus, human parainfluenza virus 2, and human rhinovirus (1.6-94.8 copies/μL, 0.20-1.98 logs). Broader detection of influenza A/H3 viruses was demonstrated by the GenMark eSensor RVP. The relationship between TCID50/mL concentrations and the corresponding copy number related to various ATCC cultures is also reported.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4646456?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT jaymeparker analyticalsensitivitycomparisonbetweensingleplexrealtimepcrandamultiplexpcrplatformfordetectingrespiratoryviruses
AT nishafowler analyticalsensitivitycomparisonbetweensingleplexrealtimepcrandamultiplexpcrplatformfordetectingrespiratoryviruses
AT marylouisewalmsley analyticalsensitivitycomparisonbetweensingleplexrealtimepcrandamultiplexpcrplatformfordetectingrespiratoryviruses
AT terrischmidt analyticalsensitivitycomparisonbetweensingleplexrealtimepcrandamultiplexpcrplatformfordetectingrespiratoryviruses
AT jasonscharrer analyticalsensitivitycomparisonbetweensingleplexrealtimepcrandamultiplexpcrplatformfordetectingrespiratoryviruses
AT jameskowaleski analyticalsensitivitycomparisonbetweensingleplexrealtimepcrandamultiplexpcrplatformfordetectingrespiratoryviruses
AT teresagrimes analyticalsensitivitycomparisonbetweensingleplexrealtimepcrandamultiplexpcrplatformfordetectingrespiratoryviruses
AT shanannhoyos analyticalsensitivitycomparisonbetweensingleplexrealtimepcrandamultiplexpcrplatformfordetectingrespiratoryviruses
AT jackchen analyticalsensitivitycomparisonbetweensingleplexrealtimepcrandamultiplexpcrplatformfordetectingrespiratoryviruses
_version_ 1716824372563410945