Direct comparison of [11C] choline and [18F] FET PET to detect glioma infiltration: a diagnostic accuracy study in eight patients

Abstract Background Positron emission tomography (PET) is increasingly used to guide local treatment in glioma. The purpose of this study was a direct comparison of two potential tracers for detecting glioma infiltration, O-(2-[18F]-fluoroethyl)-l-tyrosine ([18F] FET) and [11C] choline. Methods Eigh...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Niels Verburg, Thomas Koopman, Maqsood Yaqub, Otto S. Hoekstra, Adriaan A. Lammertsma, Lothar A. Schwarte, Frederik Barkhof, Petra J. W. Pouwels, Jan J. Heimans, Jaap C. Reijneveld, Annemieke J. M. Rozemuller, William P. Vandertop, Pieter Wesseling, Ronald Boellaard, Philip C. de Witt Hamer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2019-06-01
Series:EJNMMI Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13550-019-0523-8
id doaj-6d9c6a5bb9024f70a10e92b69f8c0b8e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6d9c6a5bb9024f70a10e92b69f8c0b8e2020-11-25T03:47:51ZengSpringerOpenEJNMMI Research2191-219X2019-06-01911910.1186/s13550-019-0523-8Direct comparison of [11C] choline and [18F] FET PET to detect glioma infiltration: a diagnostic accuracy study in eight patientsNiels Verburg0Thomas Koopman1Maqsood Yaqub2Otto S. Hoekstra3Adriaan A. Lammertsma4Lothar A. Schwarte5Frederik Barkhof6Petra J. W. Pouwels7Jan J. Heimans8Jaap C. Reijneveld9Annemieke J. M. Rozemuller10William P. Vandertop11Pieter Wesseling12Ronald Boellaard13Philip C. de Witt Hamer14Neurosurgical Center Amsterdam, Brain Tumour Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMCDepartment of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMCDepartment of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMCDepartment of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMCDepartment of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMCDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Amsterdam UMCDepartment of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMCDepartment of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMCDepartment of Neurology, Brain Tumour Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMCDepartment of Neurology, Brain Tumour Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMCDepartment of Pathology, Brain Tumour Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMCNeurosurgical Center Amsterdam, Brain Tumour Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMCDepartment of Pathology, Brain Tumour Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMCDepartment of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMCNeurosurgical Center Amsterdam, Brain Tumour Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMCAbstract Background Positron emission tomography (PET) is increasingly used to guide local treatment in glioma. The purpose of this study was a direct comparison of two potential tracers for detecting glioma infiltration, O-(2-[18F]-fluoroethyl)-l-tyrosine ([18F] FET) and [11C] choline. Methods Eight consecutive patients with newly diagnosed diffuse glioma underwent dynamic [11C] choline and [18F] FET PET scans. Preceding craniotomy, multiple stereotactic biopsies were obtained from regions inside and outside PET abnormalities. Biopsies were assessed independently for tumour presence by two neuropathologists. Imaging measurements were derived at the biopsy locations from 10 to 40 min [11C] choline and 20–40, 40–60 and 60–90 min [18F] FET intervals, as standardized uptake value (SUV) and tumour-to-brain ratio (TBR). Diagnostic accuracies of both tracers were compared using receiver operating characteristic analysis and generalized linear mixed modelling with consensus histopathological assessment as reference. Results Of the 74 biopsies, 54 (73%) contained tumour. [11C] choline SUV and [18F] FET SUV and TBR at all intervals were higher in tumour than in normal samples. For [18F] FET, the diagnostic accuracy of TBR was higher than that of SUV for intervals 40–60 min (area under the curve: 0.88 versus 0.81, p = 0.026) and 60–90 min (0.90 versus 0.81, p = 0.047). The diagnostic accuracy of [18F] FET TBR 60–90 min was higher than that of [11C] choline SUV 20–40 min (0.87 versus 0.67, p = 0.005). Conclusions [18F] FET was more accurate than [11C] choline for detecting glioma infiltration. Highest accuracy was found for [18F] FET TBR for the interval 60–90 min post-injection.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13550-019-0523-8Glioma[18F] FET[11C] cholineDiagnostic accuracyBiopsy
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Niels Verburg
Thomas Koopman
Maqsood Yaqub
Otto S. Hoekstra
Adriaan A. Lammertsma
Lothar A. Schwarte
Frederik Barkhof
Petra J. W. Pouwels
Jan J. Heimans
Jaap C. Reijneveld
Annemieke J. M. Rozemuller
William P. Vandertop
Pieter Wesseling
Ronald Boellaard
Philip C. de Witt Hamer
spellingShingle Niels Verburg
Thomas Koopman
Maqsood Yaqub
Otto S. Hoekstra
Adriaan A. Lammertsma
Lothar A. Schwarte
Frederik Barkhof
Petra J. W. Pouwels
Jan J. Heimans
Jaap C. Reijneveld
Annemieke J. M. Rozemuller
William P. Vandertop
Pieter Wesseling
Ronald Boellaard
Philip C. de Witt Hamer
Direct comparison of [11C] choline and [18F] FET PET to detect glioma infiltration: a diagnostic accuracy study in eight patients
EJNMMI Research
Glioma
[18F] FET
[11C] choline
Diagnostic accuracy
Biopsy
author_facet Niels Verburg
Thomas Koopman
Maqsood Yaqub
Otto S. Hoekstra
Adriaan A. Lammertsma
Lothar A. Schwarte
Frederik Barkhof
Petra J. W. Pouwels
Jan J. Heimans
Jaap C. Reijneveld
Annemieke J. M. Rozemuller
William P. Vandertop
Pieter Wesseling
Ronald Boellaard
Philip C. de Witt Hamer
author_sort Niels Verburg
title Direct comparison of [11C] choline and [18F] FET PET to detect glioma infiltration: a diagnostic accuracy study in eight patients
title_short Direct comparison of [11C] choline and [18F] FET PET to detect glioma infiltration: a diagnostic accuracy study in eight patients
title_full Direct comparison of [11C] choline and [18F] FET PET to detect glioma infiltration: a diagnostic accuracy study in eight patients
title_fullStr Direct comparison of [11C] choline and [18F] FET PET to detect glioma infiltration: a diagnostic accuracy study in eight patients
title_full_unstemmed Direct comparison of [11C] choline and [18F] FET PET to detect glioma infiltration: a diagnostic accuracy study in eight patients
title_sort direct comparison of [11c] choline and [18f] fet pet to detect glioma infiltration: a diagnostic accuracy study in eight patients
publisher SpringerOpen
series EJNMMI Research
issn 2191-219X
publishDate 2019-06-01
description Abstract Background Positron emission tomography (PET) is increasingly used to guide local treatment in glioma. The purpose of this study was a direct comparison of two potential tracers for detecting glioma infiltration, O-(2-[18F]-fluoroethyl)-l-tyrosine ([18F] FET) and [11C] choline. Methods Eight consecutive patients with newly diagnosed diffuse glioma underwent dynamic [11C] choline and [18F] FET PET scans. Preceding craniotomy, multiple stereotactic biopsies were obtained from regions inside and outside PET abnormalities. Biopsies were assessed independently for tumour presence by two neuropathologists. Imaging measurements were derived at the biopsy locations from 10 to 40 min [11C] choline and 20–40, 40–60 and 60–90 min [18F] FET intervals, as standardized uptake value (SUV) and tumour-to-brain ratio (TBR). Diagnostic accuracies of both tracers were compared using receiver operating characteristic analysis and generalized linear mixed modelling with consensus histopathological assessment as reference. Results Of the 74 biopsies, 54 (73%) contained tumour. [11C] choline SUV and [18F] FET SUV and TBR at all intervals were higher in tumour than in normal samples. For [18F] FET, the diagnostic accuracy of TBR was higher than that of SUV for intervals 40–60 min (area under the curve: 0.88 versus 0.81, p = 0.026) and 60–90 min (0.90 versus 0.81, p = 0.047). The diagnostic accuracy of [18F] FET TBR 60–90 min was higher than that of [11C] choline SUV 20–40 min (0.87 versus 0.67, p = 0.005). Conclusions [18F] FET was more accurate than [11C] choline for detecting glioma infiltration. Highest accuracy was found for [18F] FET TBR for the interval 60–90 min post-injection.
topic Glioma
[18F] FET
[11C] choline
Diagnostic accuracy
Biopsy
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13550-019-0523-8
work_keys_str_mv AT nielsverburg directcomparisonof11ccholineand18ffetpettodetectgliomainfiltrationadiagnosticaccuracystudyineightpatients
AT thomaskoopman directcomparisonof11ccholineand18ffetpettodetectgliomainfiltrationadiagnosticaccuracystudyineightpatients
AT maqsoodyaqub directcomparisonof11ccholineand18ffetpettodetectgliomainfiltrationadiagnosticaccuracystudyineightpatients
AT ottoshoekstra directcomparisonof11ccholineand18ffetpettodetectgliomainfiltrationadiagnosticaccuracystudyineightpatients
AT adriaanalammertsma directcomparisonof11ccholineand18ffetpettodetectgliomainfiltrationadiagnosticaccuracystudyineightpatients
AT lotharaschwarte directcomparisonof11ccholineand18ffetpettodetectgliomainfiltrationadiagnosticaccuracystudyineightpatients
AT frederikbarkhof directcomparisonof11ccholineand18ffetpettodetectgliomainfiltrationadiagnosticaccuracystudyineightpatients
AT petrajwpouwels directcomparisonof11ccholineand18ffetpettodetectgliomainfiltrationadiagnosticaccuracystudyineightpatients
AT janjheimans directcomparisonof11ccholineand18ffetpettodetectgliomainfiltrationadiagnosticaccuracystudyineightpatients
AT jaapcreijneveld directcomparisonof11ccholineand18ffetpettodetectgliomainfiltrationadiagnosticaccuracystudyineightpatients
AT annemiekejmrozemuller directcomparisonof11ccholineand18ffetpettodetectgliomainfiltrationadiagnosticaccuracystudyineightpatients
AT williampvandertop directcomparisonof11ccholineand18ffetpettodetectgliomainfiltrationadiagnosticaccuracystudyineightpatients
AT pieterwesseling directcomparisonof11ccholineand18ffetpettodetectgliomainfiltrationadiagnosticaccuracystudyineightpatients
AT ronaldboellaard directcomparisonof11ccholineand18ffetpettodetectgliomainfiltrationadiagnosticaccuracystudyineightpatients
AT philipcdewitthamer directcomparisonof11ccholineand18ffetpettodetectgliomainfiltrationadiagnosticaccuracystudyineightpatients
_version_ 1724501685367209984