Direct comparison of [11C] choline and [18F] FET PET to detect glioma infiltration: a diagnostic accuracy study in eight patients
Abstract Background Positron emission tomography (PET) is increasingly used to guide local treatment in glioma. The purpose of this study was a direct comparison of two potential tracers for detecting glioma infiltration, O-(2-[18F]-fluoroethyl)-l-tyrosine ([18F] FET) and [11C] choline. Methods Eigh...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SpringerOpen
2019-06-01
|
Series: | EJNMMI Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13550-019-0523-8 |
id |
doaj-6d9c6a5bb9024f70a10e92b69f8c0b8e |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-6d9c6a5bb9024f70a10e92b69f8c0b8e2020-11-25T03:47:51ZengSpringerOpenEJNMMI Research2191-219X2019-06-01911910.1186/s13550-019-0523-8Direct comparison of [11C] choline and [18F] FET PET to detect glioma infiltration: a diagnostic accuracy study in eight patientsNiels Verburg0Thomas Koopman1Maqsood Yaqub2Otto S. Hoekstra3Adriaan A. Lammertsma4Lothar A. Schwarte5Frederik Barkhof6Petra J. W. Pouwels7Jan J. Heimans8Jaap C. Reijneveld9Annemieke J. M. Rozemuller10William P. Vandertop11Pieter Wesseling12Ronald Boellaard13Philip C. de Witt Hamer14Neurosurgical Center Amsterdam, Brain Tumour Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMCDepartment of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMCDepartment of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMCDepartment of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMCDepartment of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMCDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Amsterdam UMCDepartment of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMCDepartment of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMCDepartment of Neurology, Brain Tumour Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMCDepartment of Neurology, Brain Tumour Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMCDepartment of Pathology, Brain Tumour Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMCNeurosurgical Center Amsterdam, Brain Tumour Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMCDepartment of Pathology, Brain Tumour Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMCDepartment of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMCNeurosurgical Center Amsterdam, Brain Tumour Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMCAbstract Background Positron emission tomography (PET) is increasingly used to guide local treatment in glioma. The purpose of this study was a direct comparison of two potential tracers for detecting glioma infiltration, O-(2-[18F]-fluoroethyl)-l-tyrosine ([18F] FET) and [11C] choline. Methods Eight consecutive patients with newly diagnosed diffuse glioma underwent dynamic [11C] choline and [18F] FET PET scans. Preceding craniotomy, multiple stereotactic biopsies were obtained from regions inside and outside PET abnormalities. Biopsies were assessed independently for tumour presence by two neuropathologists. Imaging measurements were derived at the biopsy locations from 10 to 40 min [11C] choline and 20–40, 40–60 and 60–90 min [18F] FET intervals, as standardized uptake value (SUV) and tumour-to-brain ratio (TBR). Diagnostic accuracies of both tracers were compared using receiver operating characteristic analysis and generalized linear mixed modelling with consensus histopathological assessment as reference. Results Of the 74 biopsies, 54 (73%) contained tumour. [11C] choline SUV and [18F] FET SUV and TBR at all intervals were higher in tumour than in normal samples. For [18F] FET, the diagnostic accuracy of TBR was higher than that of SUV for intervals 40–60 min (area under the curve: 0.88 versus 0.81, p = 0.026) and 60–90 min (0.90 versus 0.81, p = 0.047). The diagnostic accuracy of [18F] FET TBR 60–90 min was higher than that of [11C] choline SUV 20–40 min (0.87 versus 0.67, p = 0.005). Conclusions [18F] FET was more accurate than [11C] choline for detecting glioma infiltration. Highest accuracy was found for [18F] FET TBR for the interval 60–90 min post-injection.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13550-019-0523-8Glioma[18F] FET[11C] cholineDiagnostic accuracyBiopsy |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Niels Verburg Thomas Koopman Maqsood Yaqub Otto S. Hoekstra Adriaan A. Lammertsma Lothar A. Schwarte Frederik Barkhof Petra J. W. Pouwels Jan J. Heimans Jaap C. Reijneveld Annemieke J. M. Rozemuller William P. Vandertop Pieter Wesseling Ronald Boellaard Philip C. de Witt Hamer |
spellingShingle |
Niels Verburg Thomas Koopman Maqsood Yaqub Otto S. Hoekstra Adriaan A. Lammertsma Lothar A. Schwarte Frederik Barkhof Petra J. W. Pouwels Jan J. Heimans Jaap C. Reijneveld Annemieke J. M. Rozemuller William P. Vandertop Pieter Wesseling Ronald Boellaard Philip C. de Witt Hamer Direct comparison of [11C] choline and [18F] FET PET to detect glioma infiltration: a diagnostic accuracy study in eight patients EJNMMI Research Glioma [18F] FET [11C] choline Diagnostic accuracy Biopsy |
author_facet |
Niels Verburg Thomas Koopman Maqsood Yaqub Otto S. Hoekstra Adriaan A. Lammertsma Lothar A. Schwarte Frederik Barkhof Petra J. W. Pouwels Jan J. Heimans Jaap C. Reijneveld Annemieke J. M. Rozemuller William P. Vandertop Pieter Wesseling Ronald Boellaard Philip C. de Witt Hamer |
author_sort |
Niels Verburg |
title |
Direct comparison of [11C] choline and [18F] FET PET to detect glioma infiltration: a diagnostic accuracy study in eight patients |
title_short |
Direct comparison of [11C] choline and [18F] FET PET to detect glioma infiltration: a diagnostic accuracy study in eight patients |
title_full |
Direct comparison of [11C] choline and [18F] FET PET to detect glioma infiltration: a diagnostic accuracy study in eight patients |
title_fullStr |
Direct comparison of [11C] choline and [18F] FET PET to detect glioma infiltration: a diagnostic accuracy study in eight patients |
title_full_unstemmed |
Direct comparison of [11C] choline and [18F] FET PET to detect glioma infiltration: a diagnostic accuracy study in eight patients |
title_sort |
direct comparison of [11c] choline and [18f] fet pet to detect glioma infiltration: a diagnostic accuracy study in eight patients |
publisher |
SpringerOpen |
series |
EJNMMI Research |
issn |
2191-219X |
publishDate |
2019-06-01 |
description |
Abstract Background Positron emission tomography (PET) is increasingly used to guide local treatment in glioma. The purpose of this study was a direct comparison of two potential tracers for detecting glioma infiltration, O-(2-[18F]-fluoroethyl)-l-tyrosine ([18F] FET) and [11C] choline. Methods Eight consecutive patients with newly diagnosed diffuse glioma underwent dynamic [11C] choline and [18F] FET PET scans. Preceding craniotomy, multiple stereotactic biopsies were obtained from regions inside and outside PET abnormalities. Biopsies were assessed independently for tumour presence by two neuropathologists. Imaging measurements were derived at the biopsy locations from 10 to 40 min [11C] choline and 20–40, 40–60 and 60–90 min [18F] FET intervals, as standardized uptake value (SUV) and tumour-to-brain ratio (TBR). Diagnostic accuracies of both tracers were compared using receiver operating characteristic analysis and generalized linear mixed modelling with consensus histopathological assessment as reference. Results Of the 74 biopsies, 54 (73%) contained tumour. [11C] choline SUV and [18F] FET SUV and TBR at all intervals were higher in tumour than in normal samples. For [18F] FET, the diagnostic accuracy of TBR was higher than that of SUV for intervals 40–60 min (area under the curve: 0.88 versus 0.81, p = 0.026) and 60–90 min (0.90 versus 0.81, p = 0.047). The diagnostic accuracy of [18F] FET TBR 60–90 min was higher than that of [11C] choline SUV 20–40 min (0.87 versus 0.67, p = 0.005). Conclusions [18F] FET was more accurate than [11C] choline for detecting glioma infiltration. Highest accuracy was found for [18F] FET TBR for the interval 60–90 min post-injection. |
topic |
Glioma [18F] FET [11C] choline Diagnostic accuracy Biopsy |
url |
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13550-019-0523-8 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT nielsverburg directcomparisonof11ccholineand18ffetpettodetectgliomainfiltrationadiagnosticaccuracystudyineightpatients AT thomaskoopman directcomparisonof11ccholineand18ffetpettodetectgliomainfiltrationadiagnosticaccuracystudyineightpatients AT maqsoodyaqub directcomparisonof11ccholineand18ffetpettodetectgliomainfiltrationadiagnosticaccuracystudyineightpatients AT ottoshoekstra directcomparisonof11ccholineand18ffetpettodetectgliomainfiltrationadiagnosticaccuracystudyineightpatients AT adriaanalammertsma directcomparisonof11ccholineand18ffetpettodetectgliomainfiltrationadiagnosticaccuracystudyineightpatients AT lotharaschwarte directcomparisonof11ccholineand18ffetpettodetectgliomainfiltrationadiagnosticaccuracystudyineightpatients AT frederikbarkhof directcomparisonof11ccholineand18ffetpettodetectgliomainfiltrationadiagnosticaccuracystudyineightpatients AT petrajwpouwels directcomparisonof11ccholineand18ffetpettodetectgliomainfiltrationadiagnosticaccuracystudyineightpatients AT janjheimans directcomparisonof11ccholineand18ffetpettodetectgliomainfiltrationadiagnosticaccuracystudyineightpatients AT jaapcreijneveld directcomparisonof11ccholineand18ffetpettodetectgliomainfiltrationadiagnosticaccuracystudyineightpatients AT annemiekejmrozemuller directcomparisonof11ccholineand18ffetpettodetectgliomainfiltrationadiagnosticaccuracystudyineightpatients AT williampvandertop directcomparisonof11ccholineand18ffetpettodetectgliomainfiltrationadiagnosticaccuracystudyineightpatients AT pieterwesseling directcomparisonof11ccholineand18ffetpettodetectgliomainfiltrationadiagnosticaccuracystudyineightpatients AT ronaldboellaard directcomparisonof11ccholineand18ffetpettodetectgliomainfiltrationadiagnosticaccuracystudyineightpatients AT philipcdewitthamer directcomparisonof11ccholineand18ffetpettodetectgliomainfiltrationadiagnosticaccuracystudyineightpatients |
_version_ |
1724501685367209984 |