The Effect of Instructional Methods in Teaching Speaking to Young Learners

This study searched for empirical evidence of which instructional method, either Presentation-Practice-Production (PPP) or Task-based Learning (TBL), was more effective in teaching speaking to real beginners of young learners. The selected samples were taken by non-random sampling from Foundation II...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nita Kaniadewi, Widi Sriyanto
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: UHAMKA Press 2018-11-01
Series:Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Dasar
Online Access:http://jipd.uhamka.ac.id/index.php/jipd/article/view/76
id doaj-6b49404522424325897688f8b18dabd9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6b49404522424325897688f8b18dabd92020-11-25T00:29:18ZengUHAMKA PressJurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Dasar2477-38592477-35812018-11-0141213010.22236/jipd.v4i1.7676The Effect of Instructional Methods in Teaching Speaking to Young LearnersNita Kaniadewi0Widi Sriyanto1Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof. DR. HAMKAUniversitas Muhammadiyah Prof. DR. HAMKAThis study searched for empirical evidence of which instructional method, either Presentation-Practice-Production (PPP) or Task-based Learning (TBL), was more effective in teaching speaking to real beginners of young learners. The selected samples were taken by non-random sampling from Foundation II level with ten students for each class. This study, whose data was collected through an oral test, was an experimental research by using T-test at 0.05 significance level. The findings revealed that t-computation was higher than t-table (+2,11 > +2,10). It implied that the mean of PPP class was significantly higher than TBL class. The findings above led to a conclusion that the use of PPP was more effective than TBL in teaching speaking to young learners. It was also discovered that drilling activities, which occurred intensively in PPP, yet not in TBL, gave a great contribution in supporting the effectiveness of PPP in teaching speaking. Drillings were beneficial and met the characteristics of the students who belonged to the population of this study. Therefore, PPP, rather than TBL, was more recommended in teaching speaking to real beginners of young learners whose characteristics met the ones mentioned in the discussion below. However, since drillings can be very mechanical and meaningless, in order not to cause boredom, the length of time allocated for the activities should be considered carefully. Moreover, for an optimum result, drillings must always be accompanied by communicative activities.http://jipd.uhamka.ac.id/index.php/jipd/article/view/76
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Nita Kaniadewi
Widi Sriyanto
spellingShingle Nita Kaniadewi
Widi Sriyanto
The Effect of Instructional Methods in Teaching Speaking to Young Learners
Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Dasar
author_facet Nita Kaniadewi
Widi Sriyanto
author_sort Nita Kaniadewi
title The Effect of Instructional Methods in Teaching Speaking to Young Learners
title_short The Effect of Instructional Methods in Teaching Speaking to Young Learners
title_full The Effect of Instructional Methods in Teaching Speaking to Young Learners
title_fullStr The Effect of Instructional Methods in Teaching Speaking to Young Learners
title_full_unstemmed The Effect of Instructional Methods in Teaching Speaking to Young Learners
title_sort effect of instructional methods in teaching speaking to young learners
publisher UHAMKA Press
series Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Dasar
issn 2477-3859
2477-3581
publishDate 2018-11-01
description This study searched for empirical evidence of which instructional method, either Presentation-Practice-Production (PPP) or Task-based Learning (TBL), was more effective in teaching speaking to real beginners of young learners. The selected samples were taken by non-random sampling from Foundation II level with ten students for each class. This study, whose data was collected through an oral test, was an experimental research by using T-test at 0.05 significance level. The findings revealed that t-computation was higher than t-table (+2,11 > +2,10). It implied that the mean of PPP class was significantly higher than TBL class. The findings above led to a conclusion that the use of PPP was more effective than TBL in teaching speaking to young learners. It was also discovered that drilling activities, which occurred intensively in PPP, yet not in TBL, gave a great contribution in supporting the effectiveness of PPP in teaching speaking. Drillings were beneficial and met the characteristics of the students who belonged to the population of this study. Therefore, PPP, rather than TBL, was more recommended in teaching speaking to real beginners of young learners whose characteristics met the ones mentioned in the discussion below. However, since drillings can be very mechanical and meaningless, in order not to cause boredom, the length of time allocated for the activities should be considered carefully. Moreover, for an optimum result, drillings must always be accompanied by communicative activities.
url http://jipd.uhamka.ac.id/index.php/jipd/article/view/76
work_keys_str_mv AT nitakaniadewi theeffectofinstructionalmethodsinteachingspeakingtoyounglearners
AT widisriyanto theeffectofinstructionalmethodsinteachingspeakingtoyounglearners
AT nitakaniadewi effectofinstructionalmethodsinteachingspeakingtoyounglearners
AT widisriyanto effectofinstructionalmethodsinteachingspeakingtoyounglearners
_version_ 1725332141241270272